1-year system experience) senior planning executives (end users; "planners") working in surgical departments of university hospitals.RESULTS: Planners reported that 57% of electronic operation requests contained contradictory information. Key screens contained clinically irrelevant areas (36 +/- 29%). Compared to the legacy system, users reported either no improvements or worse performance, in regard to co-ordination of OR stakeholders, intra-day program changes, and safety. Planners concluded that the ERP-planning module was "non-intuitive" (66%), increased planning work (56%, p=0.002), and did not impact upon either organizational mishap spectrum or frequency. Interviews evidenced intra-institutional power shifts due to increased system complexity. Planners resented e.g. a trend towards increased personal culpability for mishap.CONCLUSIONS: Highly complex enterprise system extensions may not be directly suited to specific process steering tasks in a high risk/low error-environment like the OR. In view of surgeons' high primary task load, the repeated call for simpler IT is an imperative for ERP extensions. System design should consider a) that current OR IT suffers from an input limitation regarding planning-relevant real-time data, and b) that there are social processes that strongly affect planning and particularly ERP use beyond algorithms. Real improvement of clinical IT tools requires their independent evaluation according to standards developed for pharmaceutical subjects." />
Display options
Cite
Engelmann C, Ametowobla D. Advancing the integration of hospital IT. Pitfalls and perspectives when replacing specialized software for high-risk environments with enterprise system extensions. Appl Clin Inform. 2017;8(2):515-528doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-06-RA-0100.
Engelmann, C., & Ametowobla, D. (2017). Advancing the integration of hospital IT. Pitfalls and perspectives when replacing specialized software for high-risk environments with enterprise system extensions. Applied clinical informatics, 8(2), 515-528. https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2016-06-RA-0100
Engelmann, Carsten, and Ametowobla, Dzifa. "Advancing the integration of hospital IT. Pitfalls and perspectives when replacing specialized software for high-risk environments with enterprise system extensions." Applied clinical informatics vol. 8,2 (2017): 515-528. doi: https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2016-06-RA-0100
Engelmann C, Ametowobla D. Advancing the integration of hospital IT. Pitfalls and perspectives when replacing specialized software for high-risk environments with enterprise system extensions. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 May 17;8(2):515-528. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-06-RA-0100. PMID: 28512663; PMCID: PMC6241744.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Appl Clin Inform. 2017 May 17;8(2):515-528. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-06-RA-0100.

Advancing the integration of hospital IT. Pitfalls and perspectives when replacing specialized software for high-risk environments with enterprise system extensions.

Applied clinical informatics

Carsten Engelmann, Dzifa Ametowobla

Affiliations

  1. Carsten Engelmann, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Klinikum Brandenburg, Medical University Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Hochstr. 29, 14770 Brandenburg, Germany, Email: [email protected], phone: 0049 3381 41 1271, fax: 0049 3381 41 1809, mobile: 0049 172 262 09 12.

PMID: 28512663 PMCID: PMC6241744 DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2016-06-RA-0100

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Planning and controlling surgical operations hugely impacts upon productivity, patient safety, and surgeons' careers. Established, specialized software for this task is being increasingly replaced by "Operating Room (OR)-modules" appended to enterprise-wide resource planning (ERP) systems. As a result, usability problems are re-emerging and require developers' attention.

OBJECTIVE: Systematic evaluation of the functionality and social repercussions of a global, market-leading IT business control system (SAP R3, Germany), adapted for real-time OR process steering.

METHODS: Field study involving document analyses, interviews, and a 73-item survey addressed to 77 qualified (> 1-year system experience) senior planning executives (end users; "planners") working in surgical departments of university hospitals.

RESULTS: Planners reported that 57% of electronic operation requests contained contradictory information. Key screens contained clinically irrelevant areas (36 +/- 29%). Compared to the legacy system, users reported either no improvements or worse performance, in regard to co-ordination of OR stakeholders, intra-day program changes, and safety. Planners concluded that the ERP-planning module was "non-intuitive" (66%), increased planning work (56%, p=0.002), and did not impact upon either organizational mishap spectrum or frequency. Interviews evidenced intra-institutional power shifts due to increased system complexity. Planners resented e.g. a trend towards increased personal culpability for mishap.

CONCLUSIONS: Highly complex enterprise system extensions may not be directly suited to specific process steering tasks in a high risk/low error-environment like the OR. In view of surgeons' high primary task load, the repeated call for simpler IT is an imperative for ERP extensions. System design should consider a) that current OR IT suffers from an input limitation regarding planning-relevant real-time data, and b) that there are social processes that strongly affect planning and particularly ERP use beyond algorithms. Real improvement of clinical IT tools requires their independent evaluation according to standards developed for pharmaceutical subjects.

Keywords: Process steering software; enterprise systems; operation room list; surgery; user interface

References

  1. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Feb;402(1):187-190 - PubMed
  2. Ann Surg. 2010 Apr;251(4):766-71 - PubMed
  3. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar;22(2):465-71 - PubMed
  4. Anesth Analg. 2013 Sep;117(3):711-6 - PubMed
  5. J Med Syst. 2003 Jun;27(3):259-70 - PubMed
  6. Anesth Analg. 2007 Aug;105(2):419-29 - PubMed
  7. Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;65(2):143-5 - PubMed
  8. Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7 - PubMed
  9. Anesth Analg. 2015 Jul;121(1):206-18 - PubMed
  10. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jun 4;158(11):845-6 - PubMed
  11. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):542-9 - PubMed
  12. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20 Suppl 1:i43-6 - PubMed
  13. Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Feb 9;:null - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types