Display options
Share it on

Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2017 Nov;12(3):181-188. doi: 10.1007/s11751-017-0288-4. Epub 2017 May 17.

Repair of the pronator quadratus after volar plate fixation in distal radius fractures: a systematic review.

Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction

Marjolein A M Mulders, Monique M J Walenkamp, Fernande J M E Bos, Niels W L Schep, J Carel Goslings

Affiliations

  1. Trauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected].
  2. Trauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  3. Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, P.O. Box 9100, 3007 AC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

PMID: 28512698 PMCID: PMC5653597 DOI: 10.1007/s11751-017-0288-4

Abstract

To position the volar plate on the distal radius fracture site, the pronator quadratus muscle needs to be detached from its distal and radial side and lifted for optimal exposure to the fracture site. Although the conventional approach involves repair of the pronator quadratus, controversy surrounds the merits of this repair. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes of patients with distal radius fractures treated with pronator quadratus repair after volar plate fixation versus no pronator quadratus repair. A systematic search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, on 23 July 2015. All studies comparing pronator quadratus repair with no pronator quadratus repair in adult patients undergoing volar plate fixation for distal radius fractures were included. The primary outcome was the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included range of motion, grip strength, post-operative pain and complications. A total of 169 patients were included, of which 95 underwent pronator quadratus repair, while 74 patients underwent no pronator quadratus repair. At 12 months follow-up no statistically significant differences in DASH-scores and range of motion were observed between pronator quadratus repair and no repair. Moreover, post-operative pain and complication rates were similar between both groups. At 12 months of follow-up, we do not see any advantages of pronator quadratus repair after volar plate fixation in the distal radius. However, a definitive conclusion cannot be drawn from this systematic review due to a lack of available evidence.

Keywords: Distal radius; Fracture; Pronator quadratus; Repair; Volar plate fixation

References

  1. Anat Anz. 1984;157(4):311-8 - PubMed
  2. J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Mar;27(3):130-3 - PubMed
  3. Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B(7):963-9 - PubMed
  4. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 Jun;37(5):402-6 - PubMed
  5. J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Jul;25(7):425-31 - PubMed
  6. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2004 Sep;8(3):142-8 - PubMed
  7. J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Mar;30(2):289-99 - PubMed
  8. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Apr 24;15:136 - PubMed
  9. Hand Surg. 2000 Dec;5(2):103-12 - PubMed
  10. J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Sep;38(9):1678-84 - PubMed
  11. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12 - PubMed
  12. Injury. 2012 Feb;43(2):200-4 - PubMed
  13. J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Dec;39(12):2506-11 - PubMed
  14. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jun;91(6):1313-9 - PubMed
  15. J Orthop Res. 2004 Jan;22(1):208-13 - PubMed
  16. J Hand Surg Am. 2001 Sep;26(5):908-15 - PubMed
  17. Eplasty. 2011;11:e43 - PubMed
  18. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 Jun 16;4:11 - PubMed
  19. J Trauma. 2011 Oct;71(4):939-42; discussion 942-3 - PubMed
  20. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Dec;72(6):629-34 - PubMed
  21. J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Feb;33(2):164-7 - PubMed
  22. Osteoporos Int. 2002 Jul;13(7):565-71 - PubMed
  23. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Jun;40(3):357-61 - PubMed
  24. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;6(3):267-72 - PubMed
  25. J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Nov;34(9):1612-7 - PubMed
  26. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Aug;37(8):1718-25 - PubMed
  27. Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12 - PubMed
  28. Hand (N Y). 2012 Sep;7(3):276-80 - PubMed
  29. J Hand Surg Br. 1996 Dec;21(6):714-22 - PubMed
  30. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Feb 16;93(4):328-35 - PubMed
  31. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Sep;37(9):1868-73 - PubMed
  32. Eur J Med Res. 2015 Nov 25;20:93 - PubMed
  33. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014 Sep;39(7):745-54 - PubMed
  34. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Sep;97(5):465-70 - PubMed
  35. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Jun;17(6):369-77 - PubMed
  36. J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(6):958-65 - PubMed
  37. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Jul;40(7):1333-40 - PubMed
  38. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Apr;24(3):335-9 - PubMed
  39. Acta Orthop. 2013 Jun;84(3):286-91 - PubMed
  40. J Orthop Trauma. 2007 May;21(5):316-22 - PubMed
  41. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Aug;91(8):1868-73 - PubMed
  42. Chir Main. 2014 Apr;33(2):95-9 - PubMed

Publication Types