Display options
Share it on

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2017 Jul-Aug;22(4):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 May 08.

Utility of intraoral stents in external beam radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology

Hiroshi Doi, Masao Tanooka, Toshihisa Ishida, Kuniyasu Moridera, Kenji Ichimiya, Kazuo Tarutani, Kazuhiro Kitajima, Masayuki Fujiwara, Hiromitsu Kishimoto, Norihiko Kamikonya

Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Meiwa Cancer Clinic, Hyogo, Japan.
  3. Department of Radiological Technology, Hyogo College of Medicine College Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
  4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.

PMID: 28515675 PMCID: PMC5425345 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.03.002

Abstract

AIM: This study aimed to assess the utility and stability of intraoral stent during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

BACKGROUND: The benefits of intraoral stents in radiotherapy are unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 386 setup errors in 12 patients who received IMRT for head and neck cancers without intraoral stents (intraoral stent [-]) and 183 setup errors in 6 patients who received IMRT with intraoral stents (intraoral stent [+]). All patients were matched according to the immobilization method (masks and boards). Setup errors were measured as the distance from the initial setup based on the marking on the skin and mask to the corrected position based on bone matching on cone beam computed tomography.

RESULTS: The mean interfractional setup errors in the right-left, craniocaudal, anterior-posterior (AP), and three-dimensional (3D) directions were -0.33, 0.08, -0.25, and 2.75 mm in the intraoral stent (-) group and -0.37, 0.24, -0.63, and 2.42 mm in the intraoral stent (+) group, respectively (

CONCLUSION: Setup errors can be significantly reduced in the AP and 3D-directions by using intraoral stents.

Keywords: Bite block immobilization; Head and neck cancer; Intensity modulated radiation therapy; Radiotherapy; Setup error

References

  1. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Aug;74(2):171-3 - PubMed
  2. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jan 08;17 (1):5870 - PubMed
  3. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009 Feb 03;10(1):2853 - PubMed
  4. Radiother Oncol. 1997 Jun;43(3):315-21 - PubMed
  5. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Apr 1;64(5):1581-8 - PubMed
  6. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2015 Jul-Aug;20(4):292-8 - PubMed
  7. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 1;61(3):938-44 - PubMed
  8. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Feb 21;58(4):1027-40 - PubMed
  9. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Jul 1;38(4):867-73 - PubMed
  10. J Radiat Res. 2016 Nov;57(6):709-713 - PubMed
  11. J Radiat Res. 2012 Sep;53(5):785-90 - PubMed
  12. Br J Cancer. 2013 Dec 10;109(12):2980-6 - PubMed
  13. Dent Traumatol. 2009 Dec;25(6):556-64 - PubMed
  14. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Apr 1;70(5):1389-96 - PubMed
  15. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014 Nov;118(5):573-8 - PubMed
  16. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Mar;87(3):323-7 - PubMed
  17. J Clin Sleep Med. 2016 Aug 15;12 (8):1175-83 - PubMed
  18. Radiology. 1985 Aug;156(2):523-6 - PubMed
  19. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 1;61(3):779-88 - PubMed
  20. Igaku Butsuri. 2011;31(1):2-11 - PubMed
  21. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jun;144(6):594-600 - PubMed
  22. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3):949-55 - PubMed
  23. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Feb;12(2):127-36 - PubMed
  24. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 May;137(5):605-14 - PubMed
  25. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(4):425-9 - PubMed
  26. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004 Jan;14(1):52-64 - PubMed
  27. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 29;11(4):e0154226 - PubMed
  28. J Radiat Res. 2012;53(1):130-7 - PubMed
  29. J Radiat Res. 2012 Nov 1;53(6):954-60 - PubMed
  30. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Dec;273(12 ):4485-4492 - PubMed

Publication Types