Display options
Share it on

Front Plant Sci. 2017 Mar 29;8:379. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00379. eCollection 2017.

Evaluation of Yield and Drought Using Active and Passive Spectral Sensing Systems at the Reproductive Stage in Wheat.

Frontiers in plant science

Elisabeth Becker, Urs Schmidhalter

Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Science, Chair of Plant Nutrition, Technical University of MunichFreising, Germany.

PMID: 28424706 PMCID: PMC5372809 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00379

Abstract

Active and passive sensors are available for ground-based, high-throughput phenotyping in the field. However, these sensor systems have seldom been compared with respect to their determination of plant water status and water use efficiency related parameters under drought conditions. In this study, five passive and active reflectance sensors, including a hyperspectral passive sensor, an active flash sensor (AFS), the Crop Circle, and the GreenSeeker, were evaluated to assess drought-related destructive and non-destructive morphophysiological parameters (ground cover, relative leaf water content, leaf temperature, and carbon isotope discrimination of leaves and grain) and grain yield of twenty wheat (

Keywords: carbon isotope discrimination; drought stress; ground cover; phenomics; precision phenotyping; spectral reflectance indices; water indices

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):20260-4 - PubMed
  2. Plant Physiol. 2012 Dec;160(4):1710-8 - PubMed
  3. J Integr Plant Biol. 2014 May;56(5):470-9 - PubMed
  4. J Exp Bot. 2004 Nov;55(407):2447-60 - PubMed
  5. J Exp Bot. 2010 Jul;61(12):3291-303 - PubMed
  6. Trends Plant Sci. 2011 Jun;16(6):289-93 - PubMed
  7. Front Physiol. 2012 Nov 16;3:429 - PubMed
  8. Crop Sci. 2002 Jan;42(1):111-121 - PubMed
  9. Trends Plant Sci. 2011 Dec;16(12):635-44 - PubMed
  10. Ann Bot. 2002 Jun;89 Spec No:925-40 - PubMed
  11. Trends Plant Sci. 2014 Jan;19(1):52-61 - PubMed
  12. Theor Appl Genet. 2008 Dec;118(1):123-37 - PubMed

Publication Types