Display options
Share it on

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Mar;5:100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.01.006.

External data required timely response by the Trial Steering-Data Monitoring Committee for the NALoxone InVEstigation (N-ALIVE) pilot trial.

Contemporary clinical trials communications

Sheila M Bird, John Strang, Deborah Ashby, John Podmore, J Roy Robertson, Sarah Welch, Angela M Meade, Mahesh K B Parmar

Affiliations

  1. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
  2. National Addiction Centre, King's College London, London SE5 8BB, UK.
  3. Imperial Clinical Trials Unit School of Public Health, London W12 7RH, UK.
  4. Durham University School of Applied Social Sciences, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.
  5. Edinburgh University Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK.
  6. Turning Point, Gloucester GL1 2HT, UK.
  7. MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London WC2B 6NH, UK.

PMID: 28424796 PMCID: PMC5389338 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.01.006

Abstract

The prison-based N-ALIVE pilot trial had undertaken to notify the Research Ethics Committee and participants if we had reason to believe that the N-ALIVE pilot trial would not proceed to the main trial. In this paper, we describe how external data for the third year of before/after evaluation from Scotland's National Naloxone Programme, a related public health policy, were anticipated by eliciting prior opinion about the Scottish results in the month prior to their release as official statistics. We summarise how deliberations by the N-ALIVE Trial Steering-Data Monitoring Committee (TS-DMC) on N-ALIVE's own interim data, together with those on naloxone-on-release (NOR) from Scotland, led to the decision to cease randomization in the N-ALIVE pilot trial and recommend to local Principal Investigators that NOR be offered to already-randomized prisoners who had not yet been released.

Keywords: Causality; Cessation; Data Monitoring Committee; Elicitation; External evidence; Randomized pilot trial

References

  1. Control Clin Trials. 1999 Jun;20(3):229-41 - PubMed
  2. Addiction. 2010 Sep;105(9):1545-54 - PubMed
  3. J Urban Health. 2013 Oct;90(5):983-96 - PubMed
  4. Stat Med. 1993 Mar;12(5-6):419-24 - PubMed
  5. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jun 19;146(12):882-7 - PubMed
  6. Lancet. 2001 Aug 4;358(9279):375-81 - PubMed
  7. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Apr 18;294(6578):991-6 - PubMed
  8. Clin Trials. 2004 Feb;1(1):48-59 - PubMed
  9. Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2015 Feb;22(1):66-76 - PubMed
  10. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Mar 20;8:12 - PubMed
  11. Stat Med. 1994 Jul 15-30;13(13-14):1297-312 - PubMed
  12. BMJ. 2014 Nov 04;349:g6580 - PubMed
  13. BMJ. 1991 May 4;302(6784):1045-51 - PubMed
  14. Proc R Soc Med. 1965 May;58:295-300 - PubMed
  15. BMJ. 1991 Jun 22;302(6791):1539-40 - PubMed
  16. Addiction. 2008 Feb;103(2):251-5 - PubMed
  17. Addiction. 2003 Feb;98(2):185-90 - PubMed
  18. Lancet. 1994 May 28;343(8909):1357; author reply 1358 - PubMed
  19. Lancet. 2016 Jan 2;387(10013):25-6 - PubMed
  20. Control Clin Trials. 1999 Jun;20(3):207-28 - PubMed
  21. Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(7):1-238, iii-iv - PubMed
  22. Addiction. 2016 May;111(5):883-91 - PubMed
  23. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 May 1;162:236-40 - PubMed
  24. Lancet. 2005 Feb 19-25;365(9460):711-22 - PubMed
  25. Control Clin Trials. 1994 Oct;15(5):349-59 - PubMed
  26. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017 Sep 21;:null - PubMed
  27. Addiction. 2017 Mar;112(3):502-515 - PubMed
  28. BMJ. 2004 Sep 4;329(7465):525-6 - PubMed
  29. JAMA. 2005 Nov 2;294(17):2228-30 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support