Display options
Share it on

Ann Occup Environ Med. 2017 May 15;29:13. doi: 10.1186/s40557-017-0168-x. eCollection 2017.

The responses of subjective feeling, task performance ability, cortisol and HRV for the various types of floor impact sound: a pilot study.

Annals of occupational and environmental medicine

Seok Hyeon Yun, Sang Jin Park, Chang Sun Sim, Joo Hyun Sung, Ahra Kim, Jang Myeong Lee, Sang Hyun Lee, Jiho Lee

Affiliations

  1. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877, Bangeojinsunhwando-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033 Republic of Korea.
  2. Environmental Health Center, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ulsan College of Engineering, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
  4. Ulsan Science High School, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.

PMID: 28515946 PMCID: PMC5433072 DOI: 10.1186/s40557-017-0168-x

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, noise coming from the neighborhood via floor wall has become a great social problem. The noise between the floors can be a cause of physical and psychological problems, and the different types of floor impact sound (FIS) may have the different effects on the human's body and mind. The purpose of this study is to assess the responses of subjective feeling, task performance ability, cortisol and HRV for the various types of floor impact.

METHODS: Ten men and 5 women were enrolled in our study, and the English listening test was performed under the twelve different types of FIS, which were made by the combinations of bang machine (B), tapping machine (T), impact ball (I) and sound-proof mattress (M). The 15 subjects were exposed to each FIS for about 3 min, and the subjective annoyance, performance ability (English listening test), cortisol level of urine/saliva and heart rate variability (HRV) were examined. The sound pressure level (SPL) and frequency of FIS were analyzed. Repeated-measures ANOVA, paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed rank test were performed for data analysis.

RESULTS: The SPL of tapping machine (T) was reduced with the soundproof mattress (M) by 3.9-7.3 dBA. Impact ball (I) was higher than other FIS in low frequency (31.5-125 Hz) by 10 dBA, and tapping machine (T) was higher than other FIS in high frequency (2-4 k Hz) by 10 dBA. The subjective annoyance is highest in the combination of bang machine and tapping machine (BT), and next in the tapping machine (T). The English listening score was also lowest in the BT, and next in T. The difference of salivary cortisol levels between various types of FIS was significant (

CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the human's subjective and objective responses were different according to FIS types and those combinations.

Keywords: Annoyance; Cortisol; English listening test; Floor impact sound (FIS); Heart rate variability (HRV)

References

  1. Eur Heart J. 1996 Mar;17(3):354-81 - PubMed
  2. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 May;99(5):2985-3002 - PubMed
  3. Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Nov;117(11):1713-7 - PubMed
  4. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014 Jan;39:21-32 - PubMed
  5. Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1325-32 - PubMed
  6. Auton Neurosci. 2010 Jun 24;155(1-2):94-7 - PubMed
  7. Life Sci. 2002 Jan 4;70(7):745-58 - PubMed
  8. Noise Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;15(62):2-5 - PubMed
  9. Yonsei Med J. 2015 Jan;56(1):235-43 - PubMed
  10. Noise Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;14(59):184-9 - PubMed
  11. Environ Health Perspect. 2013 May;121(5):607-12 - PubMed
  12. Noise Health. 2004 Apr-Jun;6(23):87-91 - PubMed
  13. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2005;208(3):227-30 - PubMed
  14. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007 Aug;33(4):260-6 - PubMed
  15. Environ Res. 2016 Oct;150:391-7 - PubMed
  16. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Dec;27(6):795-801 - PubMed
  17. Acta Med Iran. 2016 Oct;54(10 ):657-661 - PubMed
  18. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jul;126(1):167-78 - PubMed
  19. Noise Health. 2012 Nov-Dec;14(61):292-6 - PubMed
  20. Ind Health. 1998 Jan;36(1):66-9 - PubMed
  21. Noise Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;15(62):42-54 - PubMed
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Aug 21;12(8):9952-66 - PubMed
  23. Noise Health. 2004 Apr-Jun;6(23):59-72 - PubMed
  24. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015 Jun;2(2):171-8 - PubMed
  25. Sci Total Environ. 2012 Oct 1;435-436:551-62 - PubMed
  26. Work. 2015 ;51(4):771-80 - PubMed

Publication Types