Display options
Share it on

Dermatol Pract Concept. 2017 Apr 30;7(2):7-16. doi: 10.5826/dpc.0702a02. eCollection 2017 Apr.

Use of and intentions to use dermoscopy among physicians in the United States.

Dermatology practical & conceptual

Jeffrey B Morris, Sara V Alfonso, Nilda Hernandez, M Isabel Fernández

Affiliations

  1. College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA.

PMID: 28515986 PMCID: PMC5424655 DOI: 10.5826/dpc.0702a02

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dermatologists routinely use dermoscopy to improve diagnostic accuracy of skin cancers. Much less is known about its use among other physicians who routinely examine the skin, such as family physicians, internists and plastic surgeons.

OBJECTIVES: To document the use of dermoscopy in a sample of US physicians and to examine physician and practice characteristics associated with ever having used a dermascope and having some intentions to incorporate dermoscopy into clinical practice during the next 12 months.

METHODS: From September 2015 to February 2016, we recruited 1,466 practicing physicians in person and online to complete an anonymous survey that assessed: demographic factors; physicians and practice characteristics; confidence differentiating skin lesions; knowledge and use of dermoscopy; and intentions and barriers to use dermoscopy. We conducted bivariate analysis to examine the relationship between key factors and the outcomes and entered the significant predictors into two separate logistic regressions.

RESULTS: Fifteen percent of participants had ever used a dermascope and 6% were currently using it. Factors significantly associated with ever having used a dermascope (Model 1) and having intentions to use (Model 2) at the multivariate level were: recent graduation from medical school (strongest predictor in both models), identifying as a family physician, seeing a higher number of patients with skin cancer and having a higher level of confidence differentiating skin lesions. Both models were highly significant.

CONCLUSION: Use of dermoscopy was low. Promotional efforts to increase dermoscopy use in the US are needed.

Keywords: dermatoscopy; dermoscopy; epiluminescence microscopy; intentions; use

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Arch Dermatol. 2005 Feb;141(2):155-60 - PubMed
  2. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Oct;64(10):1386-7 - PubMed
  3. Br J Soc Psychol. 2008 Jun;47(Pt 2):245-65 - PubMed
  4. Arch Dermatol. 2001 Oct;137(10):1361-3 - PubMed
  5. Can Fam Physician. 2012 Jul;58(7):740-5, e372-8 - PubMed
  6. J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Apr;135(4):947-9 - PubMed
  7. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 May;62(5):794-803 - PubMed
  8. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr 20;24(12):1877-82 - PubMed
  9. Br J Dermatol. 2009 Dec;161(6):1270-7 - PubMed
  10. Arch Dermatol. 2010 Mar;146(3):279-82 - PubMed
  11. Br J Dermatol. 2008 Sep;159(3):669-76 - PubMed
  12. Lancet Oncol. 2002 Mar;3(3):159-65 - PubMed
  13. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Sep;63(3):412-9, 419.e1-2 - PubMed
  14. Public Health Rep. 2011 Jan-Feb;126(1):130-5 - PubMed
  15. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2015 Apr 30;5(2):29-38 - PubMed
  16. Acta Derm Venereol. 2011 Jun;91(4):428-31 - PubMed
  17. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Apr;150(4):390-400 - PubMed
  18. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Oct;57(4):555-72; quiz 573-6 - PubMed
  19. Arch Dermatol. 2001 Oct;137(10):1343-50 - PubMed
  20. Br J Dermatol. 2016 Oct;175(4):744-50 - PubMed
  21. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Feb;48(2):183-7 - PubMed
  22. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6199-206 - PubMed
  23. Arch Dermatol. 2011 Jan;147(1):39-44 - PubMed
  24. Br J Dermatol. 2000 Nov;143(5):1016-20 - PubMed
  25. An Bras Dermatol. 2015 Nov-Dec;90(6):851-61 - PubMed
  26. Arch Dermatol. 2005 Jun;141(6):723-9 - PubMed
  27. Am Fam Physician. 2008 Sep 15;78(6):704, 706 - PubMed

Publication Types