Display options
Share it on

Front Neurorobot. 2017 Mar 27;11:16. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2017.00016. eCollection 2017.

Morphological Properties of Mass-Spring Networks for Optimal Locomotion Learning.

Frontiers in neurorobotics

Gabriel Urbain, Jonas Degrave, Benonie Carette, Joni Dambre, Francis Wyffels

Affiliations

  1. IDLab, Electronics and Information Systems Department, Ghent University - imec , Ghent , Belgium.

PMID: 28396634 PMCID: PMC5366341 DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2017.00016

Abstract

Robots have proven very useful in automating industrial processes. Their rigid components and powerful actuators, however, render them unsafe or unfit to work in normal human environments such as schools or hospitals. Robots made of compliant, softer materials may offer a valid alternative. Yet, the dynamics of these compliant robots are much more complicated compared to normal rigid robots of which all components can be accurately controlled. It is often claimed that, by using the concept of morphological computation, the dynamical complexity can become a strength. On the one hand, the use of flexible materials can lead to higher power efficiency and more fluent and robust motions. On the other hand, using embodiment in a closed-loop controller, part of the control task itself can be outsourced to the body dynamics. This can significantly simplify the additional resources required for locomotion control. To this goal, a first step consists in an exploration of the trade-offs between morphology, efficiency of locomotion, and the ability of a mechanical body to serve as a computational resource. In this work, we use a detailed dynamical model of a Mass-Spring-Damper (MSD) network to study these trade-offs. We first investigate the influence of the network size and compliance on locomotion quality and energy efficiency by optimizing an external open-loop controller using evolutionary algorithms. We find that larger networks can lead to more stable gaits and that the system's optimal compliance to maximize the traveled distance is directly linked to the desired frequency of locomotion. In the last set of experiments, the suitability of MSD bodies for being used in a closed loop is also investigated. Since maximally efficient actuator signals are clearly related to the natural body dynamics, in a sense, the body is tailored for the task of contributing to its own control. Using the same simulation platform, we therefore study how the network states can be successfully used to create a feedback signal and how its accuracy is linked to the body size.

Keywords: mass–spring networks; morphological computation; morphological control; physical reservoir computing; soft robotics

References

  1. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1364 - PubMed
  2. Biol Cybern. 2011 Dec;105(5-6):355-70 - PubMed
  3. Artif Life. 2013 Winter;19(1):9-34 - PubMed
  4. Artif Life. 2013 Winter;19(1):35-66 - PubMed
  5. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Jan;89(1):012716 - PubMed
  6. Neuron. 2009 Aug 27;63(4):544-57 - PubMed
  7. J R Soc Interface. 2014 Nov 6;11(100):20140437 - PubMed
  8. Science. 2005 Feb 18;307(5712):1082-5 - PubMed
  9. Biol Cybern. 2014 Apr;108(2):145-57 - PubMed
  10. J R Soc Interface. 2014 Sep 6;11(98):20140520 - PubMed
  11. Sci Rep. 2015 May 27;5:10487 - PubMed
  12. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 31;9(1):e86696 - PubMed
  13. J Biomech. 1990;23 Suppl 1:65-78 - PubMed
  14. Opt Express. 2012 Jan 30;20(3):3241-9 - PubMed
  15. Science. 2000 Apr 7;288(5463):100-6 - PubMed
  16. Biol Cybern. 2012 Nov;106(10):595-613 - PubMed
  17. Nat Commun. 2014 Mar 24;5:3541 - PubMed
  18. Artif Life. 2017 Winter;23 (1):1-24 - PubMed
  19. Front Neurorobot. 2015 Sep 25;9:10 - PubMed
  20. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Oct 27;2(10):e144 - PubMed

Publication Types