Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017 Mar 27;5:18. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00018. eCollection 2017.

Bidomain Predictions of Virtual Electrode-Induced Make and Break Excitations around Blood Vessels.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology

Adam J Connolly, Edward Vigmond, Martin J Bishop

PMID: 28396856 PMCID: PMC5366349 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00018

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Virtual electrodes formed by field stimulation during defibrillation of cardiac tissue play an important role in eliciting activations. It has been suggested that the coronary vasculature is an important source of virtual electrodes, especially during low-energy defibrillation. This work aims to further the understanding of how virtual electrodes from the coronary vasculature influence defibrillation outcomes.

METHODS: Using the bidomain model, we investigated how field stimulation elicited activations from virtual electrodes around idealized intramural blood vessels. Strength-interval curves, which quantify the stimulus strength required to elicit wavefront propagation from the vessels at different states of tissue refractoriness, were computed for each idealized geometry.

RESULTS: Make excitations occurred at late diastolic intervals, originating from regions of depolarization around the vessel. Break excitations occurred at early diastolic intervals, whereby the vessels were able to excite surrounding refractory tissue due to the local restoration of excitability by virtual electrode-induced hyperpolarizations. Overall, strength-interval curves had similar morphologies and underlying excitation mechanisms compared with previous experimental and numerical unipolar stimulation studies of cardiac tissue. Including the presence of the vessel wall increased the field strength required for make excitations but decreased the field strength required for break excitations, and the field strength at which break excitations occurred was generally greater than 5 V/cm. Finally, in a more realistic ventricular slice geometry, the proximity of virtual electrodes around subepicardial vessels was seen to cause break excitations in the form of propagating unstable wavelets to the subepicardial layer.

CONCLUSION: Representing the blood vessel wall microstructure in computational bidomain models of defibrillation is recommended as it significantly alters the electrophysiological response of the vessel to field stimulation. Although vessels may facilitate excitation of relatively refractory tissue via break excitations, the field strength required for this is generally greater than those used in the literature on low-energy defibrillation. However, the high-intensity shocks used in standard defibrillation may elicit break excitation propagation from the coronary vasculature.

Keywords: bidomain; cardiac electrophysiology; defibrillation; low energy; modeling; shock; strength–interval; vessels

References

1. Phys Rev Lett. 2012 Sep 14;109(11):118106 - PubMed
2. Circulation. 2009 Aug 11;120(6):467-76 - PubMed
3. Europace. 2014 May;16(5):705-13 - PubMed
4. Ann Biomed Eng. 1998 Jul-Aug;26(4):584-96 - PubMed
5. Acta Anat (Basel). 1998;163(2):63-8 - PubMed
6. Circ J. 2014;78(5):1127-35 - PubMed
7. Circ Res. 2000 Nov 10;87(10):922-8 - PubMed
8. Biophys J. 1997 Sep;73(3):1410-23 - PubMed
9. Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Nov 16;99(20):208101 - PubMed
10. Biophys J. 2007 Nov 15;93(10):3714-26 - PubMed
11. Circ Res. 1982 Mar;50(3):342-51 - PubMed
12. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002 Sep;49(9):1051-4 - PubMed
13. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011 Apr;58(4):1066-75 - PubMed
14. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Jul;7(7):953-61 - PubMed
15. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Jul;14(7):756-63 - PubMed
16. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997 Apr;44(4):326-8 - PubMed
17. Circ Res. 1970 Nov;27(5):811-23 - PubMed
18. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014 Mar;61(3):900-10 - PubMed
19. Phys Rev Lett. 2004 Jul 30;93(5):058101 - PubMed
20. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010 Feb;298(2):H699-718 - PubMed
21. Nature. 2011 Jul 13;475(7355):235-9 - PubMed
22. Front Physiol. 2015 Jan 06;5:511 - PubMed
23. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Jan;85(1 Pt 1):011909 - PubMed
24. J Physiol. 1976 Feb;255(2):335-46 - PubMed
25. Circ Res. 1979 May;44(5):701-12 - PubMed
26. Nat Commun. 2016 May 10;7:11437 - PubMed
27. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 07;9(10):e109754 - PubMed
28. Ann Biomed Eng. 1991;19(6):669-78 - PubMed
29. Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:134163 - PubMed
30. Heart Rhythm. 2013 Aug;10(8):1209-17 - PubMed
31. Am J Cardiol. 1975 Jul;36(1):37-44 - PubMed
32. Circ Res. 2008 Mar 28;102(6):737-45 - PubMed
33. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006 Sep;291(3):H1088-100 - PubMed
34. Biophys J. 2011 Dec 21;101(12):2871-81 - PubMed
35. Heart Rhythm. 2013 Aug;10(8):1109-16 - PubMed
36. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 Aug;82(2 Pt 1):021926 - PubMed
37. J Electrocardiol. 2003;36 Suppl:69-74 - PubMed
38. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012 Oct;40(10 ):2243-54 - PubMed
39. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996 May;7(5):424-44 - PubMed
40. J Physiol. 2013 Sep 1;591(17):4321-34 - PubMed
41. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Feb;5(1):210-9 - PubMed
42. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Aug;6(4):809-17 - PubMed
43. J Theor Biol. 1999 Aug 7;199(3):311-9 - PubMed
44. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Oct;57(10):2335-45 - PubMed
45. Biophys J. 2004 Oct;87(4):2271-82 - PubMed
46. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1993;21(1):1-77 - PubMed
47. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Jun;4(6):766-7 - PubMed
48. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005 Dec;289(6):H2602-15 - PubMed
49. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 11;60(23):2393-8 - PubMed
50. Heart Rhythm. 2008 Apr;5(4):565-72 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article

Grant support

• MR/N011007/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
• PG/14/66/30927/BHF_/British Heart Foundation/United Kingdom