Display options
Share it on

J Child Fam Stud. 2017;26(5):1491-1503. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0661-4. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

Effects of Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Preschoolers (MTFC-P) for Young Foster Children with Severe Behavioral Disturbances.

Journal of child and family studies

Caroline S Jonkman, Carlo Schuengel, Mirjam Oosterman, Robert Lindeboom, Frits Boer, Ramon J L Lindauer

Affiliations

  1. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  2. De Bascule, Academic Center for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  3. Department of Clinical Child and Family Studies and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  4. Department of Clinical Methods and Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

PMID: 28458502 PMCID: PMC5387023 DOI: 10.1007/s10826-017-0661-4

Abstract

Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Preschoolers (MTFC-P) has thus far only been tested for diminishing behavior problems in the US. This study tested relative efficacy of MTFC-P on multiple outcomes against treatment as usual in the Netherlands (TAU; Study I), and regular foster care (Study II). The sample included 55 children that received MTFC-P, 23 children received TAU and 30 children from regular foster care (RFC). Changes in behavioral and relationship functioning, trauma symptoms, hypothalamic-adrenal-pituitary (HPA-) axis functioning, and caregiving stress were assessed via questionnaires, interviews, and salivary cortisol. Outcomes of Study I were evaluated using a randomized controlled design and quasi-experimental design, outcomes of Study II according to non-equivalent group comparison. No evidence was found for relative efficacy of MTFC-P over TAU. A treatment effect was found on trauma symptoms, in favor of TAU. Outcomes of Study II revealed that whereas caregiving stress and secure base distortions were significantly more severe at baseline in MTFC-P compared to RFC, post treatment differences were no longer significant. However, percentages of symptoms of disinhibited attachment and attachment disorder were nearly equal between groups at baseline, while post treatment percentages indicated significantly more symptoms in MTFC. In addition, results revealed a significant difference in the severity of externalizing problems post treatment, in favor of RFC. The results obtained within this study indicate that children in MTFC-P and usual treatment foster care in the Dutch context improved similarly, thus not showing the same advantages that MTFC-P has demonstrated in the US. Results should be interpreted with caution due to lower than planned power. Findings underscore the challenges of testing novel treatments across contexts with highly different child welfare provisions.

Keywords: Attachment; Behavioral problems; Foster care; Randomized controlled trial; Trauma

References

  1. Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Oct;37(10):841-51 - PubMed
  2. Trials. 2013 Jul 05;14:197 - PubMed
  3. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1997 Jun;25(3):183-96 - PubMed
  4. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;15(2):63-70 - PubMed
  5. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2008 Oct;9(4):214-26 - PubMed
  6. Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Apr;30(4):409-24 - PubMed
  7. Dev Psychopathol. 2001 Summer;13(3):515-38 - PubMed
  8. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2008;68(6):448-58 - PubMed
  9. Child Abuse Negl. 2004 Aug;28(8):877-88 - PubMed
  10. Child Maltreat. 2006 May;11(2):189-97 - PubMed
  11. Child Welfare. 2008;87(5):107-24 - PubMed
  12. Child Abuse Negl. 2001 Aug;25(8):1001-14 - PubMed
  13. Child Maltreat. 2010 Feb;15(1):48-63 - PubMed
  14. Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Jun;32(6):621-5 - PubMed
  15. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1995;31(1):83-91 - PubMed
  16. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007 Sep-Nov;32(8-10):892-905 - PubMed
  17. Prev Sci. 2007 Jun;8(2):161-70 - PubMed
  18. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(2):274-86 - PubMed
  19. N Engl J Med. 1979 May 31;300(22):1242-5 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Psychol. 2002 Aug;58(8):933-46 - PubMed
  21. Dev Psychobiol. 2009 Jan;51(1):14-23 - PubMed
  22. Child Dev. 2005 Sep-Oct;76(5):1015-28 - PubMed
  23. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Mar;50(3):216-231.e3 - PubMed
  24. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 Dec 05;6(1):38 - PubMed
  25. J Clin Child Psychol. 1998 Jun;27(2):180-9 - PubMed
  26. Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Summer;20(3):1003-21 - PubMed
  27. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Aug;41(8):972-82 - PubMed
  28. Dev Psychopathol. 2001 Summer;13(3):611-28 - PubMed
  29. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;46(9):1196-203 - PubMed
  30. Dev Psychopathol. 2009 Winter;21(1):157-71 - PubMed
  31. Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;204(3):214-21 - PubMed
  32. Prev Sci. 2004 Jun;5(2):73-89 - PubMed
  33. Child Maltreat. 2005 Feb;10(1):61-71 - PubMed

Publication Types