Display options
Cite
Kneale D, Rojas-García A, Raine R, et al. The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):53doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9.
Kneale, D., Rojas-García, A., Raine, R., & Thomas, J. (2017). The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review. Implementation science : IS, 12(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9
Kneale, Dylan, et al. "The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review." Implementation science : IS vol. 12,1 (2017): 53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9
Kneale D, Rojas-García A, Raine R, Thomas J. The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review. Implement Sci. 2017 Apr 20;12(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9. PMID: 28427465; PMCID: PMC5399426.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Implement Sci. 2017 Apr 20;12(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9.

The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review.

Implementation science : IS

Dylan Kneale, Antonio Rojas-García, Rosalind Raine, James Thomas

Affiliations

  1. Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK. [email protected].
  2. NIHR CLAHRC North Thames, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
  3. Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK.

PMID: 28427465 PMCID: PMC5399426 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public health services and planning having shifted from the "health" boundary to local authority (LA; local government) control. This transformation may have interrupted flows of research evidence use in decision-making and introduced a new political element to public health decision-making. For generators of research evidence, understanding and responding to this new landscape and decision-makers' evidence needs is essential.

METHODS: We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature, drawing upon four databases and undertaking manual searching and citation tracking. Included studies were English-based, published in 2010 onwards, and were focused on public health decision-making, including the utilisation or underutilisation of research evidence use, in local (regional or sub-regional) areas. All studies presented empirical findings collected through primary research methods or through the reanalysis of existing primary data.

RESULTS: From a total of 903 records, 23 papers from 21 studies were deemed to be eligible and were included for further data extraction. Three clear trends in evidence use were identified: (i) the primacy of local evidence, (ii) the important role of local experts in providing evidence and knowledge, and (iii) the high value placed on local evaluation evidence despite the varying methodological rigour. Barriers to the use of research evidence included issues around access and availability of applicable research evidence, and indications that the use of evidence could be perceived as a bureaucratic process. Two new factors resulting from reforms to public health structures were identified that potentially changed existing patterns of research evidence use and decision-making requirements: (i) greater emphasis among public health practitioners on the perceived uniqueness of LA areas and structures following devolution of public health into LAs and (ii) challenges introduced in responding to higher levels of local political accountability.

CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to better understand and respond to the evidence needs of decision-makers working in public health and to work more collaboratively in developing solutions to the underutilisation of research evidence in decision-making.

References

  1. J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Sep;35(3):453-9 - PubMed
  2. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Oct;16(4):211-7 - PubMed
  3. BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 20;11:821 - PubMed
  4. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Mar;68(3):288-90 - PubMed
  5. Anthropol Med. 2013 Apr;20(1):1-12 - PubMed
  6. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Oct;16(4):218-25 - PubMed
  7. Eur J Public Health. 2014 Jun;24(3):490-5 - PubMed
  8. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Jul;58(7):538-45 - PubMed
  9. Sociol Health Illn. 2015 May;37(4):491-505 - PubMed
  10. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Aug 11;9:59 - PubMed
  11. Sociol Health Illn. 2012 Jan;34(1):49-63 - PubMed
  12. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;96:1-8 - PubMed
  13. J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Sep;38(3):e201-e208 - PubMed
  14. Public Health. 2015 Sep;129(9):1194-203 - PubMed
  15. Eur J Public Health. 2015 Jul 9;:null - PubMed
  16. J Adv Nurs. 2011 Jul;67(7):1408-25 - PubMed
  17. CMAJ. 2009 Aug 4;181(3-4):165-8 - PubMed
  18. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e77404 - PubMed
  19. BMJ. 2016 Jan 20;532:i272 - PubMed
  20. BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-2 - PubMed
  21. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21704 - PubMed
  22. J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Jun;38(2):237-42 - PubMed
  23. J Public Health (Oxf). 2014 Dec;36(4):546-51 - PubMed
  24. Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 09;1:28 - PubMed
  25. J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Sep;37(3):461-9 - PubMed
  26. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Nov;69(11):1129-32 - PubMed
  27. BMJ. 2011 Nov 17;343 :d7310 - PubMed
  28. BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):null - PubMed
  29. Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3:iii51-8 - PubMed
  30. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Feb;56(2):119-27 - PubMed
  31. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:175-201 - PubMed
  32. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Jan;69(1):95-8 - PubMed
  33. BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 02;5(4):e007053 - PubMed
  34. Public Health. 2014 Dec;128(12 ):1112-7 - PubMed
  35. J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Sep;35(3):460-6 - PubMed
  36. Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53 - PubMed
  37. Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 12;8:17 - PubMed
  38. J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Dec 2;38(4):e438-e445 - PubMed
  39. Eur J Public Health. 2014 Dec;24(6):1041-7 - PubMed
  40. Public Health. 2014 Jun;128(6):552-60 - PubMed
  41. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jun;72(12):1965-74 - PubMed
  42. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 03;14:2 - PubMed
  43. Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225-30 - PubMed
  44. Health Policy. 2012 Jun;106(1):97-103 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support