Display options
Share it on

Intensive Care Med Exp. 2017 Dec;5(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40635-017-0137-2. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

Improving animal welfare using continuous nalbuphine infusion in a long-term rat model of sepsis.

Intensive care medicine experimental

Victor Jeger, Mattia Arrigo, Florian F Hildenbrand, Daniel Müller, Paulin Jirkof, Till Hauffe, Burkhardt Seifert, Margarete Arras, Donat R Spahn, Dominique Bettex, Alain Rudiger

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Anaesthesiology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  2. Department of Medicine, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  3. Department of Cardiology, University Heart Centre, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  4. Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  5. Department of Surgery, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  6. Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), Department of Biostatistics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  7. Institute of Anaesthesiology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. [email protected].

PMID: 28429311 PMCID: PMC5399012 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-017-0137-2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sepsis research relies on animal models to investigate the mechanisms of the dysregulated host response to infection. Animal welfare concerns request the use of potent analgesics for the Refinement of existing sepsis models, according to the 3Rs principle. Nevertheless, adequate analgesia is often missing, partly because the effects of analgesics in this particular condition are unknown. We evaluated the use of nalbuphine, an opioid with kappa agonistic and mu antagonistic effects, in rats with and without experimental sepsis.

METHODS: Male Wistar rats were anesthetized with isoflurane and instrumented with a venous line for drug administration. Arterial cannulation allowed for blood pressure measurements and blood sampling in short-term experiments of non-septic animals. Nalbuphine (or placebo) was administered intravenously at a dose of 1 mg/kg/h. Long-term (48 h) experiments in awake septic animals included repetitive clinical scoring with the Rat Grimace Scale and continuous heart rate monitoring by telemetry. Sepsis was induced by intraperitoneal injection of faecal slurry. Nalbuphine plasma levels were measured by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry.

RESULTS: In anesthetized healthy animals, nalbuphine led to a significant reduction of respiratory rate, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure during short-term experiments. In awake septic animals, a continuous nalbuphine infusion did not affect heart rate but significantly improved the values of the Rat Grimace Scale. Nalbuphine plasma concentrations remained stable between 4 and 24 h of continuous infusion in septic rats.

CONCLUSIONS: In anaesthetised rats, nalbuphine depresses respiratory rate, heart rate, and blood pressure. In awake animals, nalbuphine analgesia improves animal welfare during sepsis.

Keywords: 3R; Analgesia; Animal welfare; Faecal peritonitis; Nalbuphine; Rat model; Sepsis

References

  1. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul;37(7):1192-200 - PubMed
  2. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004 Mar;286(3):R491-7 - PubMed
  3. Lab Anim. 1989 Apr;23(2):147-55 - PubMed
  4. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2012 May;51(3):311-21 - PubMed
  5. Shock. 2010 Sep;34(3):250-60 - PubMed
  6. J Craniofac Surg. 2001 Mar;12(2):129-33 - PubMed
  7. Clin J Pain. 2003 May-Jun;19(3):175-86 - PubMed
  8. Mol Pain. 2011 Jul 29;7:55 - PubMed
  9. Crit Care Clin. 2009 Oct;25(4):703-19, vii-viii - PubMed
  10. Br J Anaesth. 1998 Jun;80(6):814-9 - PubMed
  11. JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1583-1589 - PubMed
  12. Shock. 2005 Dec;24 Suppl 1:1-6 - PubMed
  13. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Aug;27(4):347-53 - PubMed
  14. Lab Anim. 2016 Dec;50(6):418-426 - PubMed
  15. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013 Jun;84(2):251-4 - PubMed
  16. Comp Med. 2008 Apr;58(2):120-8 - PubMed
  17. Shock. 2015 Apr;43(4):304-16 - PubMed
  18. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2012 May;51(3):357-65 - PubMed
  19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Sep 1;164(5):891-5 - PubMed
  20. Clin Sci (Lond). 2013 Mar;124(6):391-401 - PubMed
  21. Br J Anaesth. 1987 Nov;59(11):1356-63 - PubMed
  22. Crit Care. 2014 Jan 14;18(1):R15 - PubMed
  23. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1978 Feb;204(2):487-96 - PubMed
  24. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008 Nov 1;138(43-44):629-34 - PubMed
  25. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10 - PubMed
  26. Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 17;6:31667 - PubMed
  27. Physiol Behav. 1996 Dec;60(6):1397-401 - PubMed
  28. Anesth Analg. 1981 Sep;60(9):629-33 - PubMed
  29. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2011 Dec;6(4):551-65 - PubMed

Publication Types