Display options
Share it on

Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 21;7:46061. doi: 10.1038/srep46061.

Crossing lines: a multidisciplinary framework for assessing connectivity of hammerhead sharks across jurisdictional boundaries.

Scientific reports

A Chin, C A Simpfendorfer, W T White, G J Johnson, R B McAuley, M R Heupel

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
  2. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia.
  3. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Hobart, Australia.
  4. Northern Territory Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Darwin, Australia.
  5. Western Australian Department of Fisheries, Perth, Australia.

PMID: 28429742 PMCID: PMC5399444 DOI: 10.1038/srep46061

Abstract

Conservation and management of migratory species can be complex and challenging. International agreements such as the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) provide policy frameworks, but assessments and management can be hampered by lack of data and tractable mechanisms to integrate disparate datasets. An assessment of scalloped (Sphyrna lewini) and great (Sphyrna mokarran) hammerhead population structure and connectivity across northern Australia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea (PNG) was conducted to inform management responses to CMS and Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species listings of these species. An Integrated Assessment Framework (IAF) was devised to systematically incorporate data across jurisdictions and create a regional synopsis, and amalgamated a suite of data from the Australasian region. Scalloped hammerhead populations are segregated by sex and size, with Australian populations dominated by juveniles and small adult males, while Indonesian and PNG populations included large adult females. The IAF process introduced genetic and tagging data to produce conceptual models of stock structure and movement. Several hypotheses were produced to explain stock structure and movement patterns, but more data are needed to identify the most likely hypothesis. This study demonstrates a process for assessing migratory species connectivity and highlights priority areas for hammerhead management and research.

References

  1. Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Jun;31(6):463-75 - PubMed
  2. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 08;11(4):e0153116 - PubMed
  3. J Fish Biol. 2012 Apr;80(5):1789-843 - PubMed
  4. BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Feb 12;9:40 - PubMed
  5. Mol Ecol. 2006 Jul;15(8):2239-51 - PubMed
  6. Mol Ecol. 2014 Jan;23(1):118-35 - PubMed
  7. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 08;10 (4):e0121346 - PubMed
  8. Nature. 2011 Jun 22;475(7354):86-90 - PubMed
  9. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29986 - PubMed
  10. J Fish Biol. 2011 Jun;78(7):2026-51 - PubMed
  11. Conserv Physiol. 2016 Jan 13;4(1):cov059 - PubMed
  12. Ecol Evol. 2013 Jul;3(7):1902-14 - PubMed
  13. PLoS One. 2010 Aug 31;5(8):e12491 - PubMed
  14. Science. 2006 Dec 15;314(5806):1773-6 - PubMed
  15. Nature. 2002 Aug 8;418(6898):689-95 - PubMed
  16. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21459 - PubMed
  17. Elife. 2014;3:e00590 - PubMed

Publication Types