PeerJ. 2017 Apr 27;5:e3268. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3268. eCollection 2017.
Barriers to the use of personal health records by patients: a structured review.
PeerJ
Chris Showell
Affiliations
Affiliations
- eHealth Services Research Group, University of Tasmania, Australia.
PMID: 28462058
PMCID: PMC5410160 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3268
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: An increasing focus on personal electronic health records (PHRs) offers healthcare benefits for patients, particularly those in undeserved and marginalised populations, who are at risk of receiving less effective healthcare, and may have worse health outcomes. However, PHRs are likely to favour text, technical and health literate users, and be less suitable for disadvantaged patients. These concerns have prompted this review of the literature, which seeks evidence about barriers to the adoption and continued use of PHRs, the nature of the evidence for those barriers, and the stage of PHR implementation where particular barriers apply.
METHODS: Searches in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and ProQuest databases were used to retrieve articles published in English after 2003 in a refereed journal, or presented in a refereed conference or scientific meeting. After screening to remove items which were out of scope, the phase of the PHR implementation, the type of investigation, and PHR barriers were categorised using thematic coding.
RESULTS: The search retrieved 395 items; screening identified 34 in-scope publications, which provided evidence of 21 identified barriers to patient adoption and continued use of PHRs, categorised here as Individual, Demographic, Capability, Health-related, PHR or Attitudinal factors. Barriers were identified in most phases of PHR implementation, and in most types of study. A secondary outcome identified that eleven of the publications may have introduced a bias by excluding participants who were less affluent, less capable, or marginalised.
CONCLUSIONS: PHR barriers can interfere with the decision to start using a PHR, with the adoption process, and with continued use, and the impact of particular barriers may vary at different phases of PHR adoption. The complex interrelationships which exist between many of the barriers is suggested in some publications, and emerges more clearly from this review. Many PHR barriers appear to be related to low socioeconomic status. A better understanding is needed of how the effect of barriers is manifested, how that effect can be countered, and how planning and implementation of PHR initiatives can make allowance for patient level barriers to PHR adoption and use, with appropriate actions to mitigate the effect of those barriers for more disadvantaged patients.
Keywords: Barriers; Bias; Disadvantage; Personal health records; Structured review; eHealth
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares there are no competing interests.
References
- Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):60-76 - PubMed
- J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Mar-Apr;12(2):113-20 - PubMed
- Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct;24(5):1205-13 - PubMed
- Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct;24(5):1290-5 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2005 Aug 05;7(4):e47 - PubMed
- AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;:16-20 - PubMed
- AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;:514-8 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2007 Aug 18;335(7615):330-3 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2008 Jun 7;336(7656):1290-5 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2008 Jun 25;299(24):2857-67 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(3):349-55 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2009 Apr 29;11(2):e14 - PubMed
- J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):683-9 - PubMed
- PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2009 Oct 27;11(4):e44 - PubMed
- Cardiol Young. 2010 Oct;20(5):477-84 - PubMed
- Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;155:55-61 - PubMed
- Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;156:128-37 - PubMed
- Telemed J E Health. 2010 Jun;16(5):595-602 - PubMed
- J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Jul;98(3):243-9 - PubMed
- J Med Syst. 2012 Jun;36(3):1043-52 - PubMed
- J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2:183-96 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2010 Nov 16;341:c5814 - PubMed
- J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 1;18(3):318-21 - PubMed
- Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;164:280-5 - PubMed
- Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28;171(6):568-74 - PubMed
- Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 May;165(5):405-11 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Oct;26(10):1112-6 - PubMed
- J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):128-33 - PubMed
- Gerontology. 2012;58(2):164-70 - PubMed
- Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr;17(4):e104-20 - PubMed
- J Med Syst. 2012 Oct;36(5):3019-27 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 30;13(3):e71 - PubMed
- Appl Clin Inform. 2011;2(4):406-419 - PubMed
- J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Dec;18 Suppl 1:i8-12 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31888 - PubMed
- PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):e1001211 - PubMed
- Aust Health Rev. 2012 May;36(2):125-9 - PubMed
- Int J Med Inform. 2012 Oct;81(10):e63-73 - PubMed
- Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Aug;31(8):1803-13 - PubMed
- Fam Med. 2012 May;44(5):342-7 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 05;14(6):e150 - PubMed
- Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9:1-13 - PubMed
- Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;183:276-80 - PubMed
- ABNF J. 2013 Winter;24(1):10-6 - PubMed
- JMIR Res Protoc. 2013 Jan 22;2(1):e8 - PubMed
- Inform Prim Care. 2012;20(3):151-69 - PubMed
- Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1037 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 26;15(8):e168 - PubMed
- J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):679-86 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):e13-4 - PubMed
- Psychol Aging. 2013 Dec;28(4):1124-39 - PubMed
- AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:152-61 - PubMed
- Genet Med. 2014 Nov;16(11):854-61 - PubMed
- Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2296-305 - PubMed
- Health Inf Manag. 2011 Jun;40(2):39-43 - PubMed
Publication Types