Display options
Share it on

BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Oct 20;1(3):e000128. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000128. eCollection 2016.

Modifying the Interagency Emergency Health Kit to include treatment for non-communicable diseases in natural disasters and complex emergencies.

BMJ global health

Marcello Tonelli, Natasha Wiebe, Brian Nadler, Ara Darzi, Shahnawaz Rasheed

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  2. Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  3. Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.

PMID: 28588970 PMCID: PMC5321368 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000128

Abstract

The Interagency Emergency Health Kit (IEHK) provides a standard package of medicines and simple medical devices for aid agencies to use in emergencies such as disasters and armed conflicts. Despite the increasing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in such settings, the IEHK includes few drugs and devices for management of NCDs. Using published data to model the population burden of acute and chronic presentations of NCDs in emergency-prone regions, we estimated the quantity of medications and devices that should be included in the IEHK. NCDs considered were cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, hypertension and chronic respiratory disease. In scenario 1 (the primary scenario), we assumed that resources in the IEHK would only include those needed to manage acute life-threatening conditions. In scenario 2, we included resources required to manage both acute and chronic presentations of NCDs. Drugs and devices that might be required included amlodipine, aspirin, atenolol, beclomethasone, dextrose 50%, enalapril, furosemide, glibenclamide, glyceryl trinitrate, heparin, hydralazine, hydrochlorothiazide, insulin, metformin, prednisone, salbutamol and simvastatin. For scenario 1, the number of units required ranged from 12 (phials of hydralazine) to ∼15 000 (tablets of enalapril). Space and weight requirements were modest and total cost for all drugs and devices was approximately US$2078. As expected, resources required for scenario 2 were much greater. Space and cost requirements increased proportionately: estimated total cost of scenario 2 was $22 208. The resources required to treat acute NCD presentations appear modest, and their inclusion in the IEHK seems feasible.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. Circulation. 2014 Apr 8;129(14):1493-501 - PubMed
  2. Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):602-5 - PubMed
  3. Lancet. 2010 Jan 23;375(9711):341-5 - PubMed
  4. Lancet. 1983 Feb 26;1(8322):441-4 - PubMed
  5. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 1;369(5):448-57 - PubMed
  6. Biometals. 2004 Apr;17(2):145-55 - PubMed
  7. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 08;10(4):e0124314 - PubMed
  8. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014 Sep;3(3):195-203 - PubMed
  9. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Apr;89(4):472-7 - PubMed
  10. Lancet. 1991 Sep 14;338(8768):660-1 - PubMed
  11. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 May 08;3(3):e000798 - PubMed
  12. Respir Investig. 2013 Mar;51(1):17-23 - PubMed
  13. Am J Cardiol. 2012 Dec 15;110(12):1856-60 - PubMed
  14. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Feb;16(2):107-14 - PubMed
  15. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 18;46(8):1405-10 - PubMed
  16. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2013 Jul-Sep;28(3):290-302 - PubMed
  17. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):915-21 - PubMed
  18. Circ J. 2013;77(2):490-3 - PubMed
  19. PLoS Med. 2011 May;8(5):e1001030 - PubMed

Publication Types