Display options
Cite
Brody K, Nasypany AM, Baker RT, et al. Analysis of Patient Outcomes Using the MyoKinesthetic System for the Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Case Series. J Chiropr Med. 2017;16(2):111-121doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.01.002.
Brody, K., Nasypany, A. M., Baker, R. T., & May, J. M. (2017). Analysis of Patient Outcomes Using the MyoKinesthetic System for the Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Case Series. Journal of chiropractic medicine, 16(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2017.01.002
Brody, Kari, et al. "Analysis of Patient Outcomes Using the MyoKinesthetic System for the Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Case Series." Journal of chiropractic medicine vol. 16,2 (2017): 111-121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2017.01.002
Brody K, Nasypany AM, Baker RT, May JM. Analysis of Patient Outcomes Using the MyoKinesthetic System for the Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Case Series. J Chiropr Med. 2017 Jun;16(2):111-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Mar 18. PMID: 28559751; PMCID: PMC5440689.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Chiropr Med. 2017 Jun;16(2):111-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

Analysis of Patient Outcomes Using the MyoKinesthetic System for the Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Case Series.

Journal of chiropractic medicine

Kari Brody, Alan M Nasypany, Russell T Baker, James M May

Affiliations

  1. Sports Medicine, McNeese State University, Lake Charles, LA.
  2. Department of Movement Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID.

PMID: 28559751 PMCID: PMC5440689 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.01.002

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this case series was to test the feasibility of using the MyoKinesthetic (MYK) System as a treatment-based classification system and intervention for a sample of patients with low back pain.

METHODS: This within-subject intervention was completed in a university athletic training clinic. Nine participants (mean age: 31 years) with a primary complaint of LBP were evaluated and included. An athletic trainer performed the initial assessment, which contained the following components: patient history, palpation, range of motion testing, lower quarter neurologic screening, MYK System posture screen, orthopedic special tests, and baseline data for pain intensity, disability, and function. All participants were treated with the MYK System. The primary outcomes were pain, disability, function, active range of motion, posture, and global efficacy of treatment.

RESULTS: The mean number of MYK treatments administered was 12.11 (SD = 6.25), and the mean number of days until discharge was 28.67 (SD = 9.38). A repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in pain, disability, function, and posture from the initial evaluation to discharge and from the initial evaluation to a 1-month follow-up (

CONCLUSION: This study determined the feasibility of further evaluation of the MYK System as a treatment-based classification system and intervention for patients with low back pain.

Keywords: Low Back Pain; Spinal Nerves; Therapeutics

References

  1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep;86(9):1753-62 - PubMed
  2. Spine J. 2014 Dec 1;14(12):2799-810 - PubMed
  3. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70 - PubMed
  4. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1331-4 - PubMed
  5. BMC Med. 2010 Jan 26;8:10 - PubMed
  6. Phys Ther. 2013 Mar;93(3):310-20 - PubMed
  7. J Man Manip Ther. 2012 Aug;20(3):147-52 - PubMed
  8. BMC Fam Pract. 2005 Jul 14;6(1):29 - PubMed
  9. Phys Ther. 2009 Dec;89(12):1275-86 - PubMed
  10. Man Ther. 2012 Jun;17(3):201-12 - PubMed
  11. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9 - PubMed
  12. Phys Ther. 2011 Apr;91(4):496-509 - PubMed
  13. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804 - PubMed
  14. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1394-405 - PubMed
  15. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jul 1;28(13):1363-71; discussion 1372 - PubMed
  16. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jul 03;10:62 - PubMed
  17. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;120(4):802-8 - PubMed
  18. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Jun;37(6):290-302 - PubMed
  19. J Rheumatol. 2005 Mar;32(3):395-6 - PubMed
  20. Acta Physiol Scand. 1991 Dec;143(4):439-43 - PubMed
  21. Phys Ther. 2013 Jan;93(1):32-40 - PubMed
  22. Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;92(2):310-7 - PubMed
  23. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Mar 26;11:58 - PubMed
  24. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jul 15;37(16):1347-56 - PubMed
  25. Phys Ther. 2016 Jul;96(7):1057-66 - PubMed
  26. Gait Posture. 2011 May;34(1):103-6 - PubMed
  27. Phys Ther. 2012 Mar;92(3):363-77 - PubMed
  28. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2000 Aug;12(4):353-9 - PubMed
  29. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Feb;45(2):77-85, B1-4 - PubMed
  30. Aust J Physiother. 1999;45(3):215-221 - PubMed
  31. J Athl Train. 2010 Nov-Dec;45(6):630-41 - PubMed
  32. Phys Ther. 1995 Jun;75(6):470-85; discussion 485-9 - PubMed
  33. Phys Ther. 2001 Feb;81(2):776-88 - PubMed
  34. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-58 - PubMed
  35. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 - PubMed
  36. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Feb 1;154(3):181-9 - PubMed
  37. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 15;31(6):623-31 - PubMed
  38. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Dec 21;141(12):920-8 - PubMed
  39. Phys Ther. 2005 Apr;85(4):336-51 - PubMed
  40. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3 - PubMed
  41. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Oct;89(10):831-9 - PubMed
  42. J Physiol. 2010 Jan 1;588(Pt 1):201-12 - PubMed

Publication Types