Display options
Share it on

J Pain Res. 2017 Jun 06;10:1383-1390. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S115449. eCollection 2017.

Effects of acculturation, coping strategies, locus of control, and self-efficacy on chronic pain: study of Chinese immigrant women in Italy - insights from a thematic field analysis.

Journal of pain research

Tania Simona Re, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Anna Siri, César Cisneros Puebla, Susanne Friese, Mário Simões, Joël Candau, Hicham Khabbache

Affiliations

  1. UNESCO Chair "Health Anthropology, Biosphere and Healing Systems", Genoa, Italy.
  2. Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), School of Public Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
  3. Department of Sociology, Metropolitan Autonomous University-Iztapalapa, San Rafael Atlixco, Mexico.
  4. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany.
  5. Medical Faculty, University of Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
  6. Laboratory of Anthropology and Cognitive and Social Psychology (LAPCOS), University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
  7. Faculty of Literature and Humanistic Studies, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco.

PMID: 28652803 PMCID: PMC5476582 DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S115449

Abstract

Chronic pain represents a common public health concern worldwide. It is a complex phenomenon, owing to the interaction of different factors, including biological, physiological, psychological, environmental, and social variables. Some groups, such as women and immigrants, are particularly vulnerable. However, little is known about how Chinese women in Italy live with and face chronic pain. The present study aimed at filling this knowledge gap by examining the burden of chronic pain in Chinese immigrants in Italy in terms of acculturation processes, perceived control over disease, social networks, and coping strategies. A qualitative approach was used, performing a thematic field analysis. We interviewed 82 Chinese women from different Italian towns (Genoa, Milan, Turin, Bologna, Florence, and Prato) in depth. The sense of belonging to the host culture was strong in our sample. However, this did not simply reflect or translate into a linear engagement with medical systems, as health care pathways were more complex and dual (both Chinese and Western). Chinese women who felt deeply rooted in the Italian environment did not discontinue the use of traditional Chinese medicine. Chronic pain extensively and adversely affected daily life, particularly interfering with work. Coping strategies were mainly adaptive behaviors, being problem focused or maladaptive, relying upon "cope and avoid" mechanisms. Chinese women preferred to use traditional Chinese remedies rather than conventional medicine, while using the Italian system in emergencies. Perceived control over chronic pain was usually external. Finally, Chinese women with chronic pain benefit from social networks and support, which were mainly composed of Chinese peers. In conclusion, our findings underline the tremendous burden of chronic pain affecting all aspects of Chinese women's lives. Health care workers and providers should be aware of the complexity of chronic pain Therefore, a holistic approach, involving different stakeholders, should be adopted when managing chronic pain and approaching immigrant patients.

Keywords: Chinese immigrants; chronic pain; qualitative research; thematic field analysis

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  1. Pain. 2013 Jan;154(1):119-23 - PubMed
  2. BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 10;5(7):e008075 - PubMed
  3. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Mar;62(6):1498-509 - PubMed
  4. BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 13;14:352 - PubMed
  5. Soc Work. 2007 Jul;52(3):261-9 - PubMed
  6. Community Ment Health J. 2015 Feb;51(2):239-48 - PubMed
  7. J Immigr Minor Health. 2011 Aug;13(4):732-41 - PubMed
  8. J Health Econ. 2008 Mar;27(2):265-86 - PubMed
  9. Int J Equity Health. 2014 Nov 14;13:103 - PubMed
  10. Pain. 2008 Jul 31;137(3):473-7 - PubMed
  11. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998 Jul;15(4):397-408 - PubMed
  12. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;48(12):1931-9 - PubMed
  13. J Soc Psychol. 1991 Apr;131(2):157-64 - PubMed
  14. Ethn Dis. 1992 Winter;2(1):63-83 - PubMed
  15. J Rheumatol. 2001 Jun;28(6):1369-77 - PubMed
  16. Health Soc Work. 2007 Feb;32(1):57-65 - PubMed
  17. Eur J Pain. 2002;6(2):123-32 - PubMed
  18. Ethn Health. 2000 May;5(2):121-6 - PubMed
  19. J Immigr Minor Health. 2011 Apr;13(2):194-201 - PubMed
  20. Clin J Pain. 2014 Aug;30(8):713-23 - PubMed
  21. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2014 Jun 12;7:161-6 - PubMed
  22. Pain. 2012 Dec;153(12):2332-8 - PubMed
  23. Med Anthropol. 1995 Feb;16(2):141-73 - PubMed
  24. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2014 Apr;20(2):202-12 - PubMed
  25. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Sep;12(7):632-44 - PubMed
  26. Pain Manag Nurs. 2000 Sep;1(3 Suppl 1):16-22 - PubMed
  27. Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Feb;32(2):189-97 - PubMed
  28. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Jun 17;27(12):675-83 - PubMed
  29. Res Nurs Health. 2005 Apr;28(2):95-105 - PubMed
  30. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010 Mar;37(2):172-81 - PubMed
  31. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Nov;45(9):1433-47 - PubMed
  32. Acad Psychiatry. 2011 Nov 1;35(6):376-81 - PubMed
  33. Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):581-624 - PubMed
  34. J Community Health. 1999 Dec;24(6):421-37 - PubMed

Publication Types