Display options
Share it on

Exp Ther Med. 2017 May;13(5):1932-1936. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4209. Epub 2017 Mar 09.

Abdominal ultrasonography for patients with abdominal pain as a first-line diagnostic imaging modality.

Experimental and therapeutic medicine

Minoru Tomizawa, Fuminobu Shinozaki, Rumiko Hasegawa, Yoshinori Shirai, Yasufumi Motoyoshi, Takao Sugiyama, Shigenori Yamamoto, Naoki Ishige

Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Yotsukaido, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.
  2. Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Yotsukaido, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.
  3. Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Yotsukaido, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.
  4. Department of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Yotsukaido, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.
  5. Department of Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Yotsukaido, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.
  6. Department of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Yotsukaido, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.
  7. Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Yotsukaido, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.

PMID: 28565789 PMCID: PMC5443284 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4209

Abstract

The utility and limitations of abdominal ultrasonography (US) were retrospectively evaluated as a first-line diagnostic imaging modality in patients with abdominal pain. Hospital records from patients subjected to abdominal US as a first-line diagnostic imaging examination at the National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital (Yotsukaido, Japan) from April 2010 to April 2015 were analyzed. Only those patients who underwent abdominal US to diagnose abdominal symptoms were included in the present study. All patients with prior diagnostic imaging examination findings were excluded from the study in order to reduce bias of results. The analyzed patients included 39 males with an average (mean ± standard deviation) age of 65.8±18.8 years and 37 females with an average age of 53.7±19.3 years. Diagnosis with abdominal US was in agreement with the final diagnosis in 66 of the 76 patients. Final diagnosis of symptoms by abdominal US was not successful in the remaining 10 patients who required further investigation. Acute cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, acute pancreatitis, acute appendicitis, colonic diverticulitis and spleen rupture were correctly diagnosed. Different types of cancer, including colorectal cancer, were also successfully diagnosed. Bile duct cancer and sigmoid colon volvulus could not be diagnosed by abdominal US due to the presence of intestinal gas. Abnormal findings were detected using abdominal US, but the diagnosis required additional consultation with gynecologists. Abdominal US was suitable for patients with abdominal symptoms. It is recommended that patients undergo further diagnostic imaging or consultation with gynecologists when large gas bubbles are present or gynecological conditions are suspected.

Keywords: acute appendicitis; colonic diverticulitis; ovarian torsion

References

  1. Ulster Med J. 2013 Sep;82(3):179-87 - PubMed
  2. Eur J Radiol. 2004 Apr;50(1):30-6 - PubMed
  3. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;19(5):284-91 - PubMed
  4. Radiol Med. 2015 Jan;120(1):73-84 - PubMed
  5. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Nov;163(5):1113-7 - PubMed
  6. J Ultrasound Med. 2015 May;34(5):829-35 - PubMed
  7. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Apr;29(4):435-9 - PubMed
  8. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012 Sep;19(5):548-56 - PubMed
  9. Ultrasound Q. 2014 Mar;30(1):49-55 - PubMed
  10. Radiol Clin North Am. 2013 Jan;51(1):133-48 - PubMed
  11. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 May;60(123):517-21 - PubMed
  12. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec;197(6):W1067-75 - PubMed
  13. Br J Surg. 1991 Mar;78(3):315-8 - PubMed
  14. Rofo. 2014 Jun;186(6):551-8 - PubMed
  15. Dig Dis. 2012;30(1):56-9 - PubMed
  16. Curr Probl Surg. 2001 Mar;38(3):141-212 - PubMed
  17. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012:565617 - PubMed
  18. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(10 ):1867-77 - PubMed
  19. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Jan;168(1):179-86 - PubMed
  20. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2008 Oct;29(5):322-40 - PubMed
  21. BMJ. 2009 Jun 26;338:b2431 - PubMed
  22. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012 Sep;19(5):578-85 - PubMed
  23. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;27(5):691-707 - PubMed
  24. Radiographics. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1):225-42 - PubMed
  25. Pol Przegl Chir. 2012 Oct;84(10):488-94 - PubMed
  26. Radiology. 2009 Oct;253(1):31-46 - PubMed
  27. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jun;144(6):1272-81 - PubMed
  28. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Feb;170(2):361-71 - PubMed
  29. Eur Radiol. 2004 Mar;14 Suppl 4:L123-37 - PubMed
  30. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Nov;17(11):2007-12 - PubMed
  31. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2012 Dec;25(4):236-44 - PubMed

Publication Types