Display options
Share it on

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 May 09;13:1235-1243. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S133471. eCollection 2017.

Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the Hoarding Rating Scale-Self-Report (HRS-SR-J).

Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment

Aki Tsuchiyagaito, Satoshi Horiuchi, Toko Igarashi, Yoshiya Kawanori, Yoshiyuki Hirano, Hirooki Yabe, Akiko Nakagawa

Affiliations

  1. Research Center for Child Mental Development, Chiba University, Chiba.
  2. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima.
  3. United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University and University of Fukui, Osaka.
  4. Faculty of Social Welfare, Iwate Prefectural University, Iwate.
  5. Graduate School of Education, Joetsu University of Education, Niigata, Japan.

PMID: 28533685 PMCID: PMC5431741 DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S133471

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Hoarding Rating Scale-Self-Report (HRS-SR) is a five-item scale that assesses the symptoms of hoarding. These symptoms include excessive acquisition, difficulty in discarding, and excessive clutter that causes distress. We conducted three studies to examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the HRS-SR (HRS-SR-J).

METHODS: Study 1 examined its reliability; 193 college students and 320 adolescents and adults completed the HRS-SR-J and, of the college students, 32 took it again 2 weeks later. Study 2 aimed to confirm that its scores in a sample of 210 adolescents and adults are independent of social desirability. Study 3 aimed to validate the HRS-SR-J in the aspects of convergent and discriminant validity in a sample of 550 adults.

RESULTS: The HRS-SR-J showed good internal consistency and 2-week test-retest reliability. Based on the nonsignificant correlations between the HRS-SR-J and social desirability, the HRS-SR-J was not strongly affected by social desirability. In addition, it also had a good convergent validity with the Japanese version of the Saving Inventory-Revised (SI-R-J) and the hoarding subscale of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory, while having a significantly weaker correlation with the five subscales of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory, except for the hoarding subscale. In addition, the strength of the correlation between the HRS-SR-J and the Japanese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and that between the HRS-SR-J and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 were significantly weaker than the correlation between the HRS-SR-J and the SI-R-J. These results demonstrate that the HRS-SR-J has good convergent and discriminant validity.

CONCLUSION: The HRS-SR-J is a notable self-report scale for examining the severity of hoarding symptoms.

Keywords: Hoarding Rating Scale; Japanese version of the Hoarding Rating Scale-Self-Report; hoarding; reliability; validity

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  1. Behav Res Ther. 1993 May;31(4):367-81 - PubMed
  2. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;25(2):142-9 - PubMed
  3. Psychol Rep. 2007 Dec;101(3 Pt 1):952-60 - PubMed
  4. Behav Res Ther. 2002 May;40(5):517-28 - PubMed
  5. Psychiatry Res. 2010 Jun 30;178(1):147-52 - PubMed
  6. Behav Res Ther. 2004 Oct;42(10):1163-82 - PubMed
  7. Behav Res Ther. 2008 Jul;46(7):836-44 - PubMed
  8. Behav Res Ther. 2009 Aug;47(8):705-9 - PubMed
  9. J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Jan;25(1):43-8 - PubMed
  10. Psychol Assess. 2013 Mar;25(1):194-203 - PubMed
  11. J Anxiety Disord. 2006;20(5):675-86 - PubMed
  12. J Consult Psychol. 1960 Aug;24:349-54 - PubMed
  13. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7 - PubMed
  14. Psychol Assess. 2002 Dec;14(4):485-96 - PubMed
  15. Depress Anxiety. 2010 Sep;27(9):829-38 - PubMed
  16. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;166(10):1156-61 - PubMed
  17. BMC Res Notes. 2014 May 20;7:306 - PubMed
  18. Eur Spine J. 2012 Dec;21(12):2539-49 - PubMed
  19. Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):874-82 - PubMed
  20. Behav Res Ther. 2008 Mar;46(3):334-44 - PubMed
  21. Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76 - PubMed

Publication Types