Display options
Cite
Beech BM, Cordier T, Happe LE, et al. Does a Free Office Visit Affect Primary Care-Seeking Behavior? A Study of New Exchange Health Plan Enrollees in Mississippi. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017;10(2):64-71
Beech, B. M., Cordier, T., Happe, L. E., Trunk, L., Haugh, G. S., Kwong, R., Gopal, V., & Beveridge, R. A. (2017). Does a Free Office Visit Affect Primary Care-Seeking Behavior? A Study of New Exchange Health Plan Enrollees in Mississippi. American health & drug benefits, 10(2), 64-71.
Beech, Bettina M, et al. "Does a Free Office Visit Affect Primary Care-Seeking Behavior? A Study of New Exchange Health Plan Enrollees in Mississippi." American health & drug benefits vol. 10,2 (2017): 64-71.
Beech BM, Cordier T, Happe LE, Trunk L, Haugh GS, Kwong R, Gopal V, Beveridge RA. Does a Free Office Visit Affect Primary Care-Seeking Behavior? A Study of New Exchange Health Plan Enrollees in Mississippi. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017 Apr;10(2):64-71. PMID: 28626503; PMCID: PMC5470244.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017 Apr;10(2):64-71.

Does a Free Office Visit Affect Primary Care-Seeking Behavior? A Study of New Exchange Health Plan Enrollees in Mississippi.

American health & drug benefits

Bettina M Beech, Tristan Cordier, Laura E Happe, Laura Trunk, Gilbert S Haugh, Richard Kwong, Vipin Gopal, Roy A Beveridge

Affiliations

  1. Executive Director, Myrlie Evers-Williams Institute, Associate Vice Chancellor for Population Health, and Professor, Family Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.
  2. Manager, Clinical Analytics, Humana, Louisville, KY.
  3. Director of Research and Publications, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Humana.
  4. Medical Director, Contracting Negotiations, Humana.
  5. Director, Clinical Analytics, Humana.
  6. Analytics Consultant, Clinical Analytics, Humana, at the time of the study.
  7. Vice President, Clinical Analytics, Humana.
  8. Chief Medical Officer, Humana.

PMID: 28626503 PMCID: PMC5470244

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the positive association between primary care and overall health, several health plans are offering doctors' visits without patient copay, with the intent to increase primary care use. However, the effectiveness of these offers has not been established in the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a free primary care provider (PCP) office visit offered by a health plan on primary care-seeking behaviors.

METHODS: This nonrandomized concurrent control study used event/trials logistic regression to compare the differences in primary care utilization between new exchange enrollees in Mississippi who were offered a free nonpreventive PCP visit and concurrent controls from Georgia and Tennessee who were not offered a free visit, between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014, which was the first year of the exchange plans. Regression models adjusted for age, sex, plan type, rural-urban designation, and enrollment month. Visits to alternative sites of care were also assessed.

RESULTS: The adjusted number of nonpreventive PCP visits did not differ between the states (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.00). Mississippi residents were significantly more likely to go to the emergency department than the Georgia-Tennessee cohort (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.28-1.39), but they were less likely to visit an urgent care center (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.09-0.11) or a retail clinic (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.11-0.17) than their counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite being eligible for a free nonpreventive visit, enrollees in Mississippi were no more likely than their counterparts in Georgia and Tennessee to visit a PCP. These findings suggest that removing the cost barrier alone may be insufficient to change primary care-seeking behaviors, and other barriers to care should be addressed.

Keywords: barrier to care; copay; cost of care; exchange health plans; nonpreventive visit; office visit; preventive care; primary care provider; primary care–seeking behavior

References

  1. Ann Fam Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;2(5):445-51 - PubMed
  2. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1):98-103 - PubMed
  3. Dis Manag. 2007 Apr;10(2):61-73 - PubMed
  4. Track Rep. 2011 Aug;(25):1-6 - PubMed
  5. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2009 Jan;2(1):14-24 - PubMed
  6. Am Econ Rev. 2010 Mar 1;100(1):193-213 - PubMed
  7. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jun;34(6):1010-8 - PubMed
  8. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 28;362(4):320-8 - PubMed
  9. Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):426-32 - PubMed
  10. Med Care. 1998 Aug;36(8):1249-55 - PubMed
  11. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Oct;15(8):648-58 - PubMed
  12. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 24;358(4):375-83 - PubMed
  13. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jan-Feb;27(1):103-12 - PubMed
  14. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502 - PubMed
  15. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Sep;23(9):1354-60 - PubMed
  16. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017 Apr;10(2):64-71 - PubMed
  17. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):766-72 - PubMed
  18. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 28;353(4):418-9 - PubMed
  19. P T. 2012 Jan;37(1):45-55 - PubMed
  20. N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 22;356(8):765-8 - PubMed
  21. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;20(6):518-26 - PubMed
  22. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Dec 1;157:36-43 - PubMed
  23. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008 Feb;4(1):269-86 - PubMed
  24. Med Care. 2016 Apr;54(4):394-9 - PubMed
  25. Am J Public Health. 2013 Nov;103(11):2007-13 - PubMed

Publication Types