Display options
Share it on

Arch Plast Surg. 2017 May;44(3):188-193. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.188. Epub 2017 May 22.

Current Methods for the Treatment of Alveolar Cleft.

Archives of plastic surgery

Nak Heon Kang

Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

PMID: 28573092 PMCID: PMC5447527 DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.188

Abstract

Alveolar cleft is a tornado-shaped bone defect in the maxillary arch. The treatment goals for alveolar cleft are stabilization and provision of bone continuity to the maxillary arch, permitting support for tooth eruption, eliminating oronasal fistulas, providing an improved esthetic result, and improving speech. Treatment protocols vary in terms of the operative time, surgical techniques, and graft materials. Early approaches including boneless bone grafting (gingivoperiosteoplasty) and primary bone graft fell into disfavor because they impaired facial growth, and they remain controversial. Secondary bone graft (SBG) is not the most perfect method, but long-term follow-up has shown that the graft is absorbed to a lesser extent, does not impede facial growth, and supports other teeth. Accordingly, SBG in the mixed dentition phase (6-11 years) has become the preferred method of treatment. The most commonly used graft material is cancellous bone from the iliac crest. Recently, many researchers have investigated the use of allogeneic bone, artificial bone, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein, along with growth factors because of their ability to decrease donor-site morbidity. Further investigations of bone substitutes and additives will continue to be needed to increase their effectiveness and to reduce complications.

Keywords: Alveolar bone grafting; Bone morphogenetic proteins; Bone substitutes

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

  1. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Oct;57(10):1209-13 - PubMed
  2. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002 May;39(3):255-60 - PubMed
  3. Osterr Z Stomatol. 1954 Nov;51(11):582-3 - PubMed
  4. J Craniofac Surg. 2003 Nov;14(6):840-6 - PubMed
  5. Clin Plast Surg. 2004 Apr;31(2):303-13 - PubMed
  6. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Mar;115(3):687-95 - PubMed
  7. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Sep;100(3):271-7 - PubMed
  8. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007 Mar;44(2):142-8 - PubMed
  9. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Dec;46(8):665-70 - PubMed
  10. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009 Sep;46(5):503-11 - PubMed
  11. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 Mar;87(3):423-7; discussion 428 - PubMed
  12. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;127(3):1173-81 - PubMed
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Aug;128(2):485-91 - PubMed
  14. Arch Plast Surg. 2012 Sep;39(5):477-82 - PubMed
  15. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):1107-15 - PubMed
  16. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Apr;131(4):854-9 - PubMed
  17. Int J Biomed Sci. 2011 Jun;7(2):81-8 - PubMed
  18. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Feb;133(2):345-54 - PubMed
  19. Clin Plast Surg. 2014 Apr;41(2):219-32 - PubMed
  20. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 May;133(5):662e-668e - PubMed
  21. J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Sep;25(5):1650-2 - PubMed
  22. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2015 Aug;16(2):49-52 - PubMed
  23. Cleft Palate J. 1988 Jul;25(3):288-95 - PubMed
  24. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Nov;45(11):913-9 - PubMed
  25. Cleft Palate J. 1986 Jul;23(3):175-205 - PubMed
  26. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;1(2):113-30 - PubMed
  27. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1982 Nov;40(11):721-5 - PubMed
  28. Cleft Palate J. 1982 Jan;19(1):9-16 - PubMed
  29. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;15(2):127-40 - PubMed
  30. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995 Sep;32(5):420-7 - PubMed
  31. Clin Plast Surg. 1993 Oct;20(4):691-705 - PubMed
  32. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 Nov;33(6):513-8 - PubMed
  33. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997 May;34(3):195-8 - PubMed
  34. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 Dec;36(6):434-9 - PubMed

Publication Types