J Pharm Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar;8(1):59-62. doi: 10.1111/jphs.12162. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
Outcomes Associated with Pharmacist-Led Diabetes Collaborative Drug Therapy Management in a Medicaid Population.
Journal of pharmaceutical health services research : an official journal of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain
Eman Biltaji, Minkyoung Yoo, Brandon T Jennings, Jennifer P Leiser, Carrie McAdam-Marx
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, University of Utah, 30 S. 2000 E., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, 801 585 1065, [email protected].
- Department of Economics, University of Utah, 332 S 1400 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, 801 581 7481, [email protected].
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Shenandoah University Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy, 1460 University Drive, Winchester, VA 22601, 540 665 1282, [email protected].
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, 375 Chipeta Way Rm 201, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, 801 581 7961, [email protected].
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, 30 S. 2000 E., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, 801 587 7728, [email protected].
PMID: 28630653
PMCID: PMC5473652 DOI: 10.1111/jphs.12162
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Pharmacist-led diabetes collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) has been shown to improve outcomes. Whether such programs are effective specifically in Medicaid patients, who face barriers to access and self-management, has not been well characterized. This pilot study explores glycemic control, utilization and costs associated with pharmacist-led CDTM in a small population of Medicaid patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
METHODS: A pre-post, historical cohort study was conducted of patients with T2DM and Medicaid coverage who received pharmacist-led CDTM in community-based primary clinics between 2008-2012. Outcomes included change in HbA1c, healthcare costs and utilization.
RESULTS: This study included 79 Medicaid patients with T2DM who received pharmacist-led CDTM. A subset of 46 patients with Medicaid coverage through an affiliated Medicaid Plan, Healthy U, was identified for additional analysis. At 6-months follow-up, HbA1c was a mean (SD) of 2.0% (2.0) lower than the baseline of 10.3% (1.7). Primary care clinic encounters increased by a mean (median) of 3.4 (2) visits. Per patient health system charges increased by a mean (median) of $4,392 ($620) and the amount paid by Medicaid in the Healthy U subset was $822 ($68) higher in the follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: A pharmacist-led diabetes CDTM intervention was associated with improved glycemic control in Medicaid patients, which corresponded with a higher number of primary care visits and observed costs. These findings are consistent with studies not limited to Medicaid, suggesting that CDTM can be effective in type 2 diabetes patients with Medicaid coverage.
Keywords: Type 2 diabetes; clinical pharmacy service; costs; disparity
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest. None to report.
References
- Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012 Nov 15;69(22):1951-3 - PubMed
- Med Care. 2014 Aug;52(8):720-7 - PubMed
- J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Sep;20(9):914-9 - PubMed
- J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Jun;21(6):452-68 - PubMed
Publication Types
Grant support