Display options
Cite
Penders TM, Wuensch KL, Ninan PT. eMindLog: Self-Measurement of Anxiety and Depression Using Mobile Technology. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(5):e98doi: 10.2196/resprot.7447.
Penders, T. M., Wuensch, K. L., & Ninan, P. T. (2017). eMindLog: Self-Measurement of Anxiety and Depression Using Mobile Technology. JMIR research protocols, 6(5), e98. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.7447
Penders, Thomas M, et al. "eMindLog: Self-Measurement of Anxiety and Depression Using Mobile Technology." JMIR research protocols vol. 6,5 (2017): e98. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.7447
Penders TM, Wuensch KL, Ninan PT. eMindLog: Self-Measurement of Anxiety and Depression Using Mobile Technology. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 May 24;6(5):e98. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7447. PMID: 28539304; PMCID: PMC5463054.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 May 24;6(5):e98. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7447.

eMindLog: Self-Measurement of Anxiety and Depression Using Mobile Technology.

JMIR research protocols

Thomas M Penders, Karl L Wuensch, Philip T Ninan

Affiliations

  1. Brody School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.
  2. East Carolina University, Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.
  3. Brody School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, East Carolina University, Washington, NC, United States.

PMID: 28539304 PMCID: PMC5463054 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.7447

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantifying anxiety and depressive experiences permits individuals to calibrate where they are and monitor intervention-associated changes. eMindLog is a novel self-report measure for anxiety and depression that is grounded in psychology with an organizing structure based on neuroscience.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to explore the psychometric properties of eMindLog in a nonclinical sample of subjects.

METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of eMindLog, a convenience sample of 198 adults provided informed consent and completed eMindLog and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as a reference. Brain systems (eg, negative and positive valence systems, cognitive systems) and their functional states that drive behavior are measured daily as emotions, thoughts, and behaviors. Associated symptoms, quality of life, and functioning are assessed weekly. eMindLog offers ease of use and expediency, using mobile technology across multiple platforms, with dashboard reporting of scores. It enhances precision by providing distinct, nonoverlapping description of terms, and accuracy through guidance for scoring severity.

RESULTS: eMindLog daily total score had a Cronbach alpha of .94. Pearson correlation coefficient for eMindLog indexes for anxiety and sadness/anhedonia were r=.66 (P<.001) and r=.62 (P<.001) contrasted with the HADS anxiety and depression subscales respectively. Of 195 subjects, 23 (11.8%) had cross-sectional symptoms above the threshold for Generalized Anxiety Disorder and 29 (29/195, 14.9%) for Major Depressive Disorder. Factor analysis supported the theoretically derived index derivatives for anxiety, anger, sadness, and anhedonia.

CONCLUSIONS: eMindLog is a novel self-measurement tool to measure anxiety and depression, demonstrating excellent reliability and strong validity in a nonclinical population. Further studies in clinical populations are necessary for fuller validation of its psychometric properties. Self-measurement of anxiety and depressive symptoms with precision and accuracy has several potential benefits, including case detection, tracking change over time, efficacy assessment of interventions, and exploration of potential biomarkers.

©Thomas M Penders, Karl L Wuensch, Philip T Ninan. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 24.05.2017.

Keywords: anxiety; depression; internet; measurement; mobile

References

  1. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13 - PubMed
  2. Nat Med. 2017 Jan;23 (1):28-38 - PubMed
  3. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 27;18(6):e156 - PubMed
  4. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Jan 28;10:153-65 - PubMed
  5. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70 - PubMed
  6. Biol Cybern. 2014 Oct;108(5):573-93 - PubMed
  7. J Psychiatr Res. 2011 Jan;45(1):96-103 - PubMed
  8. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jan 24;8:6 - PubMed
  9. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;162(12):2395; author reply 2397-8 - PubMed
  10. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 May;3(5):472-80 - PubMed
  11. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Jul;5(7):583-9 - PubMed
  12. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:359-87 - PubMed
  13. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Mar 15;59(6):493-501 - PubMed
  14. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Jun;11 Suppl 3:89-95 - PubMed
  15. World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):28-35 - PubMed
  16. Depress Anxiety. 2012 Dec;29(12):1043-9 - PubMed
  17. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77 - PubMed
  18. Trends Neurosci. 2012 Jan;35(1):68-77 - PubMed
  19. Cell. 2016 Mar 10;164(6):1269-76 - PubMed
  20. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 1;174(6):533-545 - PubMed
  21. J Neurosci. 1998 Jan 1;18(1):411-8 - PubMed

Publication Types