Display options
Share it on

Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2017 Mar 22;4:2054358117698668. doi: 10.1177/2054358117698668. eCollection 2017.

Trends in the Management of Patients With Kidney Failure in Alberta, Canada (2004-2013).

Canadian journal of kidney health and disease

Christy C Chong, Helen Tam-Tham, Brenda R Hemmelgarn, Robert G Weaver, Nairne Scott-Douglas, Marcello Tonelli, Robert R Quinn, Liam Manns, Braden J Manns

Affiliations

  1. Interdisciplinary Chronic Disease Collaboration, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  2. Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  3. Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  4. Libin Cardiovascular Institute and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  5. Kidney Health Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.

PMID: 28540058 PMCID: PMC5433679 DOI: 10.1177/2054358117698668

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Based on clinical practice guidelines, specific quality indicators are examined to assess the performance of a health care system for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We examined trends in the proportion of patients with ESRD referred late to nephrology, timing of dialysis initiation in those with chronic kidney disease, and proportion of patients with ESRD treated with pre-emptive kidney transplantation or peritoneal dialysis (PD).

CONCLUSIONS: We noted improvement in late referrals and early dialysis initiation over time. However, we also noted low and stable use of pre-emptive kidney transplantation and PD at 90 days, which warrants further exploration. These findings support the need for quality improvement initiatives designed to address these gaps in care and improve outcomes for patients with kidney failure.

Keywords: chronic; health care; kidney failure; kidney transplantation; peritoneal dialysis; quality indicators; renal replacement therapy

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2011 Jan-Mar;30(1):23-8 - PubMed
  2. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Sep;64(3):359-66 - PubMed
  3. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Sep;64(3):319-21 - PubMed
  4. Hypertension. 2009 Dec;54(6):1423-8 - PubMed
  5. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998 Jul;13(7):1799-803 - PubMed
  6. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004 Jun;43(6):999-1007 - PubMed
  7. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2007 Sep;7(2-3):149-69 - PubMed
  8. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Dec;4 Suppl 1:S5-11 - PubMed
  9. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Mar 16;130(6):461-70 - PubMed
  10. Perit Dial Int. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(6):596-9 - PubMed
  11. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000 Jul;36(1):35-41 - PubMed
  12. Diabetes Care. 2002 Mar;25(3):512-6 - PubMed
  13. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Nov;6(11):2642-9 - PubMed
  14. Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9 - PubMed
  15. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Nov;42(5):972-81 - PubMed
  16. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Oct;5(10):1828-35 - PubMed
  17. CMAJ. 2005 Nov 8;173(10):S1-25 - PubMed
  18. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Feb;16(2):489-95 - PubMed
  19. Kidney Int. 2001 Oct;60(4):1547-54 - PubMed
  20. Clin Invest Med. 2001 Aug;24(4):164-70 - PubMed
  21. Korean J Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):17-22 - PubMed
  22. CMAJ. 2014 Feb 4;186(2):112-7 - PubMed
  23. Med J Aust. 2002 Aug 5;177(3):135-8 - PubMed
  24. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Oct 7;9(10):1747-56 - PubMed
  25. N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 12;363(7):609-19 - PubMed
  26. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Oct;18(10):2781-8 - PubMed
  27. Transplant Proc. 2015 Apr;47(3):626-9 - PubMed
  28. JAMA. 2010 Mar 24;303(12):1151-8 - PubMed
  29. NDT Plus. 2010 Feb;3(1):17-27 - PubMed

Publication Types