Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 16;8:981. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00981. eCollection 2017.

Rapid Estimation of Gustatory Sensitivity Thresholds with SIAM and QUEST.

Frontiers in psychology

Richard Höchenberger, Kathrin Ohla

Affiliations

  1. Psychophysiology of Food Perception, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-RehbrueckeNuthetal, Germany.
  2. NutriAct - Competence Cluster Nutrition Research Berlin-PotsdamNuthetal, Germany.

PMID: 28670293 PMCID: PMC5472845 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00981

Abstract

Adaptive methods provide quick and reliable estimates of sensory sensitivity. Yet, these procedures are typically developed for and applied to the non-chemical senses only, i.e., to vision, audition, and somatosensation. The relatively long inter-stimulus-intervals in gustatory studies, which are required to minimize adaptation and habituation, call for time-efficient threshold estimations. We therefore tested the suitability of two adaptive yes-no methods based on SIAM and QUEST for rapid estimation of taste sensitivity by comparing test-retest reliability for sucrose, citric acid, sodium chloride, and quinine hydrochloride thresholds. We show that taste thresholds can be obtained in a time efficient manner with both methods (within only 6.5 min on average using QUEST and ~9.5 min using SIAM). QUEST yielded higher test-retest correlations than SIAM in three of the four tastants. Either method allows for taste threshold estimation with low strain on participants, rendering them particularly advantageous for use in subjects with limited attentional or mnemonic capacities, and for time-constrained applications during cohort studies or in the testing of patients and children.

Keywords: QUEST; SIAM; gustation; taste sensitivity; threshold

References

  1. Biol Psychol. 2010 Dec;85(3):446-55 - PubMed
  2. Laryngoscope. 2008 Aug;118(8):1411-6 - PubMed
  3. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Dec;88(6):2645-55 - PubMed
  4. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Aug;73(6):1934-47 - PubMed
  5. Appetite. 2017 Apr 1;111:158-165 - PubMed
  6. Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1421-55 - PubMed
  7. Spat Vis. 1997;11(1):121-8 - PubMed
  8. Chem Senses. 2013 May;38(4):333-42 - PubMed
  9. Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1330-47 - PubMed
  10. Vision Res. 1994 Apr;34(7):885-912 - PubMed
  11. Percept Psychophys. 1983 Feb;33(2):113-20 - PubMed
  12. Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63 - PubMed
  13. Nature. 2006 May 18;441(7091):354-7 - PubMed
  14. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Jul 04;14:214 - PubMed
  15. Front Neuroinform. 2009 Jan 15;2:10 - PubMed
  16. Percept Psychophys. 1988 Feb;43(2):107-14 - PubMed
  17. Chemosens Percept. 2012 Mar 1;5(1):87-99 - PubMed
  18. Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1279-92 - PubMed
  19. Physiol Behav. 1985 Nov;35(5):779-83 - PubMed
  20. Brain Struct Funct. 2010 Jun;214(5-6):551-61 - PubMed
  21. J Neurol. 2009 Feb;256(2):242-8 - PubMed
  22. Rhinology. 2003 Mar;41(1):2-6 - PubMed
  23. Laryngoscope. 2000 Aug;110(8):1396-401 - PubMed
  24. Percept Psychophys. 1987 Sep;42(3):240-9 - PubMed

Publication Types