Display options
Share it on

Internet Interv. 2017 Jun;8:15-26. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 02.

Teens Engaged in Collaborative Health: The Feasibility and Acceptability of an Online Skill-Building Intervention for Adolescents at Risk for Depression.

Internet interventions

Emily G Lattie, Joyce Ho, Elizabeth Sargent, Kathryn N Tomasino, J D Smith, C Hendricks Brown, David C Mohr

Affiliations

  1. Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 750 N. Lake Shore Dr., 10 Floor, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.
  2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 750 N. Lake Shore Dr., 10 Floor, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.

PMID: 28584734 PMCID: PMC5456272 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.02.003

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing need for effective and accessible preventive interventions for adolescent depression and substance abuse. This paper reports on a field trial of an online indicated preventive intervention, ProjectTECH, which is based on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques. The study aims to gather information about the feasibility and acceptability of this program. Secondary aims of this study were to examine the impact of the program on depression symptoms, perceived stress, positive affect, and substance use and to compare differences between groups that were led by a peer versus those that were led by a licensed clinician.

METHODS: High school students (n = 39) were recruited primarily through social media advertisements, and assigned to four groups of 8-12 individuals to collaboratively participate in an 8 week peer network-based online preventive intervention which were led by a trained peer guide or a licensed clinician. Participants were provided with didactic lessons, CBT-based mood management tools, and peer networking features, and completed quantitative and qualitative feedback at baseline, midpoint, end of intervention, and 1 month follow up.

RESULTS: The program attracted and retained users primarily from social media and was used frequently by many of the participants (system login M = 25.62, SD = 16.58). Participants rated the program as usable, and offered several suggestions for improving the program, including allowing for further personalization by the individual user, and including more prompts to engage with the social network. From baseline to end of intervention, significant decreases were observed in depressive symptoms and perceived stress (

CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study indicates that ProjectTECH, an indicated preventive intervention for high school-aged adolescents, demonstrates both feasibility, acceptability, and short-term, longitudinal psychological benefits for participants. Future iterations of the program may benefit from close attention to user interface design and the continued use of trained peer support guides.

Keywords: adolescents; cognitive behavioral therapy; depression; internet; prevention

References

  1. Prev Sci. 2007 Sep;8(3):206-13 - PubMed
  2. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;54(1):37-44.e2 - PubMed
  3. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 17;:null - PubMed
  4. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96 - PubMed
  5. Cogn Behav Ther. 2006;35(1):43-54 - PubMed
  6. BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Dec 30;10:113 - PubMed
  7. Lancet. 2012 Mar 17;379(9820):1056-67 - PubMed
  8. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;72 (11):1110-8 - PubMed
  9. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Feb;51:30-47 - PubMed
  10. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jan 24;14(1):e13 - PubMed
  11. J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Jan;44(1):90-113 - PubMed
  12. Prev Sci. 2016 Jul;17 (5):595-605 - PubMed
  13. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 13;5(10):e13196 - PubMed
  14. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2009 Feb;30(1):23-37 - PubMed
  15. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Apr;72(2):276-87 - PubMed
  16. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013 Jul-Aug;35(4):332-8 - PubMed
  17. Addiction. 2013 Dec;108(12):2119-28 - PubMed
  18. JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Sep 23;3(3):e45 - PubMed
  19. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Aug;83(4):736-47 - PubMed
  20. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016 Jun 10;65(6):1-174 - PubMed
  21. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;69(4):390-8 - PubMed
  22. Psychooncology. 2013 Apr;22(4):947-51 - PubMed
  23. PLoS One. 2010 Jun 08;5(6):e10939 - PubMed
  24. Prev Sci. 2016 Apr;17 (3):314-24 - PubMed
  25. JAMA. 2016 May 3;315(17):1854-63 - PubMed
  26. J Clin Psychol. 2008 Nov;64(11):1238-60 - PubMed
  27. Pediatrics. 2003 Aug;112(2):e119-31 - PubMed
  28. Dev Psychopathol. 1998 Summer;10(3):549-70 - PubMed
  29. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Apr;74(2):356-66 - PubMed
  30. Internet Interv. 2016 Nov;6:50-56 - PubMed
  31. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 07;14(3):e86 - PubMed
  32. Clin Psychol Rev. 2000 Mar;20(2):173-89 - PubMed
  33. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;61(8):807-16 - PubMed
  34. Depress Anxiety. 2016 Dec;33(12 ):1123-1131 - PubMed
  35. J Adolesc Health. 2016 Oct;59(4):401-10 - PubMed
  36. Psychosom Med. 2009 Nov;71(9):987-95 - PubMed
  37. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Feb;31(1):104-12 - PubMed
  38. Int Conf Pervasive Comput Technol Healthc. 2015 Aug;2015:null - PubMed
  39. Prev Sci. 2016 Dec 24;:null - PubMed
  40. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011 Jan-Feb;33(1):29-36 - PubMed
  41. J Affect Disord. 2013 May;147(1-3):338-44 - PubMed
  42. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Apr;7(2):243-8 - PubMed
  43. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Dec;77(6):1021-32 - PubMed
  44. Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(1):65-72 - PubMed
  45. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Jan 21;14:14 - PubMed
  46. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support