Display options
Share it on

CMAJ Open. 2017 Jun 22;5(2):E496-E507. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160140.

Military-related sexual assault in Canada: a cross-sectional survey.

CMAJ open

Kimberley Watkins, Rachel Bennett, Mark A Zamorski, Isabelle Richer

Affiliations

  1. Affiliation: Department of National Defence, Ottawa, Ont.

PMID: 28642253 PMCID: PMC5498324 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160140

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most research on military-related sexual assault is based on the United States military and has important limitations, such as low response rates. We sought to estimate the lifetime prevalence of sexual assault, assess its relation to military service and identify the circumstances, correlates and associations with mental disorders of military-related sexual assault among Canadian military personnel.

METHODS: We used the 2013 Canadian Forces Mental Health Survey, a cross-sectional representative survey of Canadian Regular Force personnel (

RESULTS: Self-reported sexual assault was more prevalent among women (non-military-related sexual assault 24.2%, military-related sexual assault 15.5%) than men (5.9% and 0.8%, respectively). About a quarter of women with military-related sexual assault reported experiencing at least 1 event on deployment. After covariates were controlled for, military-related sexual assault was independently associated with any lifetime and any past-year mental disorder (adjusted odds ratio 2.9 and 3.0, respectively) and lifetime and past-year posttraumatic stress disorder (adjusted odds ratio 4.3 and 4.1, respectively).

INTERPRETATION: Canadian military women are at increased risk for sexual assault and military-related sexual assault relative to their male counterparts. Deployment may be a period of elevated risk for military-related sexual assault, and women who reported military-related sexual assault are more likely to have experienced mental disorders, especially posttraumatic stress disorder.

Copyright 2017, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors are employed by the Department of National Defence. No other competing interests were declared.

References

  1. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2008 Fall;14(3):171-81 - PubMed
  2. Am J Ind Med. 2003 Mar;43(3):262-73 - PubMed
  3. J Trauma Dissociation. 2011;12(3):244-60 - PubMed
  4. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2011 Apr;25(2):138-47 - PubMed
  5. Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;61(1 Suppl):10S-25S - PubMed
  6. J Interpers Violence. 2007 Feb;22(2):179-97 - PubMed
  7. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2008 Oct;9(4):250-69 - PubMed
  8. Res Nurs Health. 2011 Dec;34(6):457-67 - PubMed
  9. Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):345-9 - PubMed
  10. J Trauma Stress. 2015 Aug;28(4):298-306 - PubMed
  11. Womens Health Issues. 2013 Jul-Aug;23(4):e215-23 - PubMed
  12. J Trauma Dissociation. 2011;12(3):324-45 - PubMed

Publication Types