Display options
Share it on

Front Neurol. 2017 Jun 09;8:268. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00268. eCollection 2017.

High Compliance with Scheduled Nimodipine Is Associated with Better Outcome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients Cotreated with Heparin Infusion.

Frontiers in neurology

Aaron Wessell, Matthew J Kole, Neeraj Badjatia, Gunjan Parikh, Jennifer S Albrecht, David L Schreibman, J Marc Simard

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  2. Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  3. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  4. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  5. Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  6. Department of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

PMID: 28649230 PMCID: PMC5465287 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00268

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine whether compliance with scheduled nimodipine in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients impacted patient outcomes, with the intent of guiding future nimodipine management in patients who experience nimodipine-induced hypotension.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 118 consecutive aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients treated with the Maryland Low-Dose IV Heparin Infusion Protocol. Patients were categorized into three independent nimodipine compliance groups: ≥1 dose held, ≥1 dose split, and no missed or split-doses. A split-dose was defined as 30 mg of nimodipine administered every 2 h. Our primary outcome was discharge to home. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess predictors of discharge disposition as a function of nimodipine compliance.

RESULTS: Of the 118 patients, 20 (17%) received all nimodipine doses, 6 (5%) received split-doses but never had a full dose held, and 92 (78%) had ≥1 dose held. Forty-five percent of patients were discharged to home, including 75% who received all doses, 67% who received ≥1 split-doses, and 37% with ≥1 missed doses (

CONCLUSION: In aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with modified Fisher scores 2 through 4 who are cotreated with a low-dose heparin infusion, full compliance with nimodipine dosing was associated with increased odds of discharge to home.

Keywords: cerebral aneurysm; cerebral vasospasm; heparin; nimodipine; subarachnoid hemorrhage; vascular disorders

References

  1. Epidemiology. 2009 Jul;20(4):488-95 - PubMed
  2. Transl Stroke Res. 2012 Jul;3(Suppl 1):155-65 - PubMed
  3. N Engl J Med. 1983 Mar 17;308(11):619-24 - PubMed
  4. Stroke. 2012 Jun;43(6):1711-37 - PubMed
  5. Lancet. 2005 Sep 3-9;366(9488):809-17 - PubMed
  6. Neurol Res. 2006 Oct;28(7):713-20 - PubMed
  7. Neuroscience. 2014 Nov 7;280:10-8 - PubMed
  8. Neurocrit Care. 2011 Jun;14(3):334-40 - PubMed
  9. Drugs. 1989 May;37(5):669-99 - PubMed
  10. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 May;7(5):322-5 - PubMed
  11. Neurocrit Care. 2015 Dec;23 (3):355-63 - PubMed
  12. Neurocrit Care. 2011 Sep;15(2):211-40 - PubMed
  13. Lancet. 2007 Jan 27;369(9558):306-18 - PubMed
  14. Neurocrit Care. 2016 Aug;25(1):29-39 - PubMed
  15. Neurosurg Rev. 2000 Sep;23(3):145-50 - PubMed
  16. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Nov;47(10):1287-91 - PubMed
  17. Stroke. 2012 Dec;43(12 ):3230-7 - PubMed
  18. Drug Discov Today. 2008 Mar;13(5-6):254-60 - PubMed
  19. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 11;10(9):e0137946 - PubMed
  20. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;10(1):35-44 - PubMed
  21. J Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;119(6):1611-9 - PubMed
  22. Eur J Biochem. 2000 Dec;267(24):7094-101 - PubMed
  23. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Mar;68(3):337-41 - PubMed
  24. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:858496 - PubMed
  25. J Neurosurg. 1988 Apr;68(4):505-17 - PubMed
  26. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Jan;10(1):44-58 - PubMed
  27. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2011 Feb;29(1):93-105 - PubMed
  28. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2015 Mar;35(2):189-96 - PubMed
  29. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1986;82(3-4):110-4 - PubMed
  30. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 26;354(4):387-96 - PubMed
  31. Stroke. 2012 Aug;43(8):2097-101 - PubMed
  32. Semin Neurol. 2005 Dec;25(4):435-44 - PubMed
  33. Neurocrit Care. 2004;1(2):235-46 - PubMed
  34. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2007 May;3(5):256-63 - PubMed
  35. J Neurol Sci. 1996 Dec;144(1-2):84-90 - PubMed
  36. Neurosurgery. 1988 Mar;22(3):484-91 - PubMed
  37. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007 Jul;27(7):1293-308 - PubMed
  38. Neurocrit Care. 2010 Dec;13(3):439-49 - PubMed
  39. Anesth Analg. 2004 Apr;98 (4):1133-9, table of contents - PubMed
  40. Neuropharmacology. 1996;35(12):1737-42 - PubMed
  41. Stroke. 2009 Nov;40(11):3478-84 - PubMed
  42. Neurology. 1986 Mar;36(3):329-33 - PubMed
  43. Neurol Res. 2009 Mar;31(2):195-9 - PubMed
  44. Stroke. 2007 Jun;38(6):1831-6 - PubMed
  45. J Neuroinflammation. 2015 Mar 25;12:56 - PubMed
  46. Molecules. 2015 Jan 09;20(1):1003-13 - PubMed
  47. Stroke. 2008 Nov;39(11):3015-21 - PubMed
  48. BMJ. 1989 Mar 11;298(6674):636-42 - PubMed
  49. Stroke. 1999 Apr;30(4):780-6 - PubMed
  50. Stroke. 2001 Oct;32(10):2433-8 - PubMed
  51. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008 Nov;28(11):1761-70 - PubMed
  52. Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Oct 14;15(10):18453-65 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support