Display options
Share it on

J Glob Oncol. 2016 Jun 08;3(1):43-53. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2015.002980. eCollection 2017 Feb.

Patient-Reported Burden of a Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET) Diagnosis: Results From the First Global Survey of Patients With NETs.

Journal of global oncology

Simron Singh, Dan Granberg, Edward Wolin, Richard Warner, Maia Sissons, Teodora Kolarova, Grace Goldstein, Marianne Pavel, Kjell Öberg, John Leyden

Affiliations

  1. , University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and , Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; , Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY; , Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; , NET Patient Foundation, Hockley Heath, United Kingdom; , APOZ & Friends, Sofia, Bulgaria; , The Carcinoid Cancer Foundation, Inc., White Plains, NY; , Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and , The Unicorn Foundation, Mosman, New South Wales, Australia.

PMID: 28717741 PMCID: PMC5493232 DOI: 10.1200/JGO.2015.002980

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite the considerable impact of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) on patients' daily lives, the journey of the patient with a NET has rarely been documented, with published data to date being limited to small qualitative studies. NETs are heterogeneous malignancies with nonspecific symptomology, leading to extensive health care use and diagnostic delays that affect survival. A large, international patient survey was conducted to increase understanding of the experience of the patient with a NET and identify unmet needs, with the aim of improving disease awareness and care worldwide.

METHODS: An anonymous, self-reported survey was conducted (online or on paper) from February to May 2014, recruiting patients with NETs from > 12 countries as a collaboration between the International Neuroendocrine Cancer Alliance and Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Survey questions captured information on sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, NET diagnostic experience, disease impact/management, interaction with medical teams, NET knowledge/awareness, and sources of information. This article reports the most relevant findings on patient experience with NETs and the impact of NETs on health care system resources.

RESULTS: A total of 1,928 patients with NETs participated. A NET diagnosis had a substantially negative impact on patients' personal and work lives. Patients reported delayed diagnosis and extensive NET-related health care resource use. Patients desired improvement in many aspects of NET care, including availability of a wider range of NET-specific treatment options, better access to NET experts or specialist centers, and a more knowledgeable, better-coordinated/-aligned NET medical team.

CONCLUSION: This global patient-reported survey demonstrates the considerable burden of NETs with regard to symptoms, work and daily life, and health care resource use, and highlights considerable unmet needs. Further intervention is required to improve the patient experience among those with NETs.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and contributions are found at the end of this article.The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. A

References

  1. Cancer. 2015 Feb 15;121(4):589-97 - PubMed
  2. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):501-13 - PubMed
  3. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Dec;14 (6):428-32 - PubMed
  4. Qual Life Res. 2009 Aug;18(6):719-26 - PubMed
  5. Pancreas. 2012 Apr;41(3):461-6 - PubMed
  6. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 20;26(18):3063-72 - PubMed
  7. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2011 Mar;30 Suppl 1:3-7 - PubMed
  8. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 17;371(3):224-33 - PubMed
  9. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e62487 - PubMed
  10. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4656-63 - PubMed
  11. J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;45(2):234-43 - PubMed
  12. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):921-5 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Oct;17(5):541-5 - PubMed
  14. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2012 Aug;19(4):306-13 - PubMed
  15. Pancreas. 2010 Aug;39(6):713-34 - PubMed
  16. Lancet. 2011 Dec 10;378(9808):2005-2012 - PubMed
  17. Ann Oncol. 2010 Oct;21 Suppl 7:vii72-80 - PubMed
  18. Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):968-77 - PubMed
  19. Eur J Cancer. 2013 May;49(8):1975-83 - PubMed
  20. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):514-23 - PubMed
  21. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2007 Dec;11(5):434-41 - PubMed
  22. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Nov;21(11):2108-17 - PubMed
  23. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 May-Jun;21(3):80-90 - PubMed
  24. J Oncol Pract. 2010 Nov;6(6):e11-6 - PubMed
  25. Virchows Arch. 2007 Oct;451(4):757-62 - PubMed
  26. Pancreas. 2010 Aug;39(6):753-66 - PubMed
  27. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Dec;396(8):1145-56 - PubMed

Publication Types