SAGE Open Med. 2017 Jul 18;5:2050312117719628. doi: 10.1177/2050312117719628. eCollection 2017.
Comparison of hospital length of stay in patients treated with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants or parenteral agents plus warfarin for venous thromboembolism.
SAGE open medicine
Catherine A Saint, Michelle R Castelli, Andrew J Crannage, Zachary A Stacy, Erin K Hennessey
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Mercy Hospital St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
- UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
- St. Louis College of Pharmacy, St. Louis, MO, USA.
PMID: 28781876
PMCID: PMC5521330 DOI: 10.1177/2050312117719628
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Existing research comparing hospital length of stay for patients treated with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants or parenteral bridging to warfarin has been conducted primarily with the agent rivaroxaban. The objective of this study was to compare hospital length of stay between patients initiated on the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants, apixaban or rivaroxaban, and patients initiated on parenteral anticoagulation agents plus warfarin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at an 859-bed, not-for-profit, teaching hospital. Adult patients admitted for a primary diagnosis of venous thromboembolism between 1 November 2012 and 31 August 2015 and treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban or a parenteral anticoagulant plus warfarin were included in the study. Eligible patients were identified using
RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were included in this study. Patient characteristics, including renal function, were similar between study arms. Venous thromboembolism treatment with apixaban or rivaroxaban compared to a parenteral anticoagulant plus warfarin was associated with a reduced hospital length of stay (2.63 vs 5.33 days; p < 0.05) and decreased total hospital cost adjusted to 2015 dollars (US$21,694 vs US$38,851; p = 0.013).
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that treatment with a non-vitamin K anticoagulant may significantly reduce hospital length of stay and total hospital cost compared to a parenteral anticoagulant plus warfarin for patients admitted for venous thromboembolism.
Keywords: Adult medicine; anticoagulants; anticoagulation; cardiology; clinical practice; cost benefit; disease management; hematology; warfarin
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Z.A. Stacy is a
References
- Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):7S-47S - PubMed
- Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;12 (3):311-318 - PubMed
- J Med Econ. 2016 Aug;19(8):769-76 - PubMed
- Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(7):650-6 - PubMed
- Clin Ther. 2015 Mar 1;37(3):554-62 - PubMed
- Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 May;30(5):829-37 - PubMed
- Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Oct;36(10 ):1109-1115 - PubMed
- Chest. 2016 Feb;149(2):315-52 - PubMed
- Hosp Pract (1995). 2015;43(2):85-93 - PubMed
- Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Jun;31(6):1057-61 - PubMed
- J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Oct 6;5(10 ):null - PubMed
- Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2016 Jan 1;:1076029616661415 - PubMed
- Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Apr;30(4):645-53 - PubMed
- J Med Econ. 2014 Oct;17(10):691-5 - PubMed
- J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Dec 01;4(12):null - PubMed
- Lung. 2016 Aug;194(4):605-11 - PubMed
- Clin Ther. 2016 Nov;38(11):2496-2503 - PubMed
- Thrombosis. 2015;2015:414523 - PubMed
- Hosp Pract (1995). 2015;43(3):172-9 - PubMed
Publication Types