Display options
Cite
Yang P, Evans S, Khan Z, et al. Reconstruction of the distal tibia following resection of aggressive bone tumours using a custom-made megaprosthesis. J Orthop. 2017;14(3):406-409doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2017.06.003.
Yang, P., Evans, S., Khan, Z., Abudu, A., Jeys, L., & Grimer, R. (2017). Reconstruction of the distal tibia following resection of aggressive bone tumours using a custom-made megaprosthesis. Journal of orthopaedics, 14(3), 406-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2017.06.003
Yang, P, et al. "Reconstruction of the distal tibia following resection of aggressive bone tumours using a custom-made megaprosthesis." Journal of orthopaedics vol. 14,3 (2017): 406-409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2017.06.003
Yang P, Evans S, Khan Z, Abudu A, Jeys L, Grimer R. Reconstruction of the distal tibia following resection of aggressive bone tumours using a custom-made megaprosthesis. J Orthop. 2017 Jun 24;14(3):406-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2017.06.003. eCollection 2017 Sep. PMID: 28725124; PMCID: PMC5508224.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Orthop. 2017 Jun 24;14(3):406-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2017.06.003. eCollection 2017 Sep.

Reconstruction of the distal tibia following resection of aggressive bone tumours using a custom-made megaprosthesis.

Journal of orthopaedics

P Yang, S Evans, Z Khan, A Abudu, L Jeys, R Grimer

Affiliations

  1. Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

PMID: 28725124 PMCID: PMC5508224 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2017.06.003

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Largest, single-centre study of clinical and functional outcomes of patients who underwent endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) for aggressive distal tibial bone tumours.

METHOD: Retrospective observational study of eight patients was undertaken.

RESULTS: Median follow-up was 77 months (range 13-276). Cumulative five and ten year survival was 63% and 42% respectively. Three patients developed either disease recurrence or metastases post-surgery. One patient developed deep infection requiring washout and suppressive antibiotics. No patients required revision surgery. The median MSTS score at last follow up was 66%.

CONCLUSIONS: EPR of the distal tibia is a viable option and provides good function outcomes.

Keywords: Distal tibia; Endoprosthesis; Endoprosthetic replacement; Osteosarcoma; Primary

References

  1. Int Orthop. 2005 Aug;29(4):255-9 - PubMed
  2. Int Orthop. 2000;24(5):282-4 - PubMed
  3. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002 Jul-Aug;10(4):259-70 - PubMed
  4. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Sep;81(5):803-7 - PubMed
  5. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Sep;62(6):1027-30 - PubMed
  6. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Dec;77(12 ):1867-75 - PubMed
  7. J Clin Oncol. 1985 May;3(5):686-97 - PubMed
  8. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Dec;68(9):1331-7 - PubMed
  9. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 Nov;67(5):785-90 - PubMed
  10. Foot Ankle Int. 2004 May;25(5):325-30 - PubMed
  11. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jun;470(6):1735-48 - PubMed
  12. Cancer Treat Res. 2009;152:3-13 - PubMed
  13. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986 Aug;57(4):290-4 - PubMed
  14. Foot Ankle Int. 1994 May;15(5):242-9 - PubMed
  15. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Jan;(262):78-87 - PubMed
  16. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Oct;91(10 ):1378-82 - PubMed
  17. Int Orthop. 1999;23(5):291-4 - PubMed

Publication Types