Display options
Share it on

Ecol Evol. 2016 Sep 07;6(19):6930-6942. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2383. eCollection 2016 Oct.

Emlen funnel experiments revisited: methods update for studying compass orientation in songbirds.

Ecology and evolution

Giuseppe Bianco, Mihaela Ilieva, Clas Veibäck, Kristoffer Öfjäll, Alicja Gadomska, Gustaf Hendeby, Michael Felsberg, Fredrik Gustafsson, Susanne Åkesson

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Animal Movement Research Department of Biology Lund University Ecology Building SE-223 62 Lund Sweden.
  2. Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research Bulgarian Academy of Sciences 2 Gagarin street 1113 Sofia Bulgaria.
  3. Division of Automatic Control Department of Electrical Engineering Linköping University SE-581 83 Linköping Sweden.
  4. Computer Vision Laboratory Department of Electrical Engineering Linköping University SE-581 83 Linköping Sweden.

PMID: 28725370 PMCID: PMC5513225 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2383

Abstract

Migratory songbirds carry an inherited capacity to migrate several thousand kilometers each year crossing continental landmasses and barriers between distant breeding sites and wintering areas. How individual songbirds manage with extreme precision to find their way is still largely unknown. The functional characteristics of biological compasses used by songbird migrants has mainly been investigated by recording the birds directed migratory activity in circular cages, so-called Emlen funnels. This method is 50 years old and has not received major updates over the past decades. The aim of this work was to compare the results from newly developed digital methods with the established manual methods to evaluate songbird migratory activity and orientation in circular cages.We performed orientation experiments using the European robin (

Keywords: Computer vision; image analysis; magnetic alignment; navigation

References

  1. J Exp Biol. 2001 Nov;204(Pt 22):3855-65 - PubMed
  2. Anim Behav. 1998 May;55(5):1311-24 - PubMed
  3. Science. 2006 Aug 11;313(5788):837-9 - PubMed
  4. EXS. 1991;60:270-306 - PubMed
  5. Nature. 2004 May 13;429(6988):177-80 - PubMed
  6. Nature. 2014 May 15;509(7500):353-6 - PubMed
  7. EXS. 1991;60:16-37 - PubMed
  8. Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Oct;8(10):367-71 - PubMed
  9. Nat Methods. 2014 Jul;11(7):743-8 - PubMed
  10. Biol Open. 2016 Feb 16;5(3):272-8 - PubMed
  11. J Struct Biol. 1991 Aug;107(1):6-14 - PubMed
  12. Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 1;25(11):1463-5 - PubMed
  13. Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5 - PubMed
  14. Curr Biol. 2004 Nov 9;14(21):1946-9 - PubMed
  15. Biol Lett. 2008 Dec 23;4(6):619-22 - PubMed
  16. Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Jul;29(7):417-28 - PubMed
  17. Curr Biol. 2005 Sep 6;15(17):1591-7 - PubMed
  18. Anim Behav. 1999 Apr;57(4):819-828 - PubMed
  19. Biol Open. 2014 Dec 12;4(1):35-47 - PubMed
  20. Science. 1972 Apr 7;176(4030):62-4 - PubMed
  21. J Exp Biol. 2006 Jan;209(Pt 1):2-17 - PubMed
  22. J Exp Biol. 2002 Dec;205(Pt 24):3845-56 - PubMed

Publication Types