Display options
Share it on

BMC Nurs. 2017 Jul 11;16:37. doi: 10.1186/s12912-017-0231-5. eCollection 2017.

Aspects of family caregiving as addressed in planned discussions between nurses, patients with chronic diseases and family caregivers: a qualitative content analysis.

BMC nursing

E I Hagedoorn, W Paans, T Jaarsma, J C Keers, C van der Schans, M Louise Luttik

Affiliations

  1. Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Research Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  2. University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Department of Health Psychology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  3. Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Research Group Nursing Diagnostics, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  4. Linköping University, Department of Social and Welfare Studies (ISV), Linköping, Sweden.
  5. Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  6. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands.

PMID: 28701898 PMCID: PMC5504762 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-017-0231-5

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Caregiving by family members of elderly with chronic conditions is currently intensifying in the context of an aging population and health care reform in the Netherlands. It is essential that nurses have attention for supporting roles of family caregivers of older patients and address family caregiving aspects on behalf of the continuity of care. This study aims to explore what aspects of family caregiving were addressed during planned discussions between nurses, patients and family caregivers in the hospital.

METHODS: Qualitative descriptive research was conducted using non-participant observation and audio-recordings of planned discussions between nurses, older patients and their family caregivers as they took place in the hospital. Through purposive sampling eligible patients (≥ 65 years) with one or more chronic conditions were included. These patients were admitted to the hospital for diagnostics or due to consequences of their chronic illness. Retrospective chart review was done to obtain patient characteristics. Data were collected in November/December 2013 and April/May 2014 in four hospitals. Qualitative content analysis was performed using the inductive approach in order to gain insight into addressed aspects of family caregiving.

RESULTS: A total of 62 patients (mean age (SD) 76 years (7.2), 52% male) were included in the study, resulting in 146 planned discussions (62 admission and discharge discussions and 22 family meetings). Three themes were identified regarding addressed aspects of family caregiving. Two themes referred to aspects addressing the patients' social network, and included 'social network structure' and 'social network support'. One theme referred to aspects addressing coordination of care issues involving family caregiving, referred to as 'coordination of care'.

CONCLUSIONS: During discussions nurses mostly addressed practical information on the patients' social network structure. When specific family caregiving support was addressed, information was limited and nurses did not seem to explore the nature of the family support. Patients discharge and after care needs were addressed occasionally as aspects of coordination of care. Current nursing policies could be evaluated on nursing and family oriented theories. Implications for education could include mirroring study findings with nurses in a group discussion to enhance their awareness on family caregiving aspects.

Keywords: Chronic diseases; Elderly; Family caregiving; Hospitalization; Nursing processes

References

  1. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2012 Jul-Sep;35(3):194-204 - PubMed
  2. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2004 Apr;12(2):114-20 - PubMed
  3. J Adv Nurs. 2003 Feb;41(3):306-13 - PubMed
  4. J Fam Nurs. 2011 Feb;17(1):61-81 - PubMed
  5. Heart. 2002 Mar;87(3):235-41 - PubMed
  6. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Sep;50(9):1197-205 - PubMed
  7. J Clin Nurs. 2003 May;12(3):431-41 - PubMed
  8. J Adv Nurs. 1997 May;25(5):908-14 - PubMed
  9. Res Nurs Health. 2000 Feb;23(1):3-16 - PubMed
  10. Int J Nurs Stud. 1992 Feb;29(1):49-57 - PubMed
  11. J Clin Nurs. 2013 Aug;22(15-16):2327-37 - PubMed
  12. Sociol Health Illn. 2009 Sep;31(6):907-23 - PubMed
  13. J Clin Nurs. 2009 Mar;18(6):857-65 - PubMed
  14. J Fam Nurs. 2005 Feb;11(1):38-58 - PubMed
  15. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15 - PubMed
  16. J Clin Nurs. 2012 Jul;21(13-14):2072-82 - PubMed
  17. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012 Sep-Oct;27(5):384-93 - PubMed
  18. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Sep;45(9):1329-43 - PubMed
  19. BMC Nurs. 2011 Oct 07;10:19 - PubMed
  20. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 May;45(5):668-81 - PubMed
  21. J Fam Nurs. 2014 Nov;20(4):462-86 - PubMed
  22. Heart Lung. 2012 Mar-Apr;41(2):107-14 - PubMed
  23. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Dec;27(4):792-803 - PubMed
  24. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jul 30;14:331 - PubMed
  25. Chronic Illn. 2011 Mar;7(1):60-86 - PubMed
  26. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):439-45 - PubMed
  27. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007 Mar-Apr;22(2):131-7 - PubMed
  28. J Fam Nurs. 2006 Aug;12(3):234-50 - PubMed
  29. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):162-9 - PubMed
  30. Psychother Psychosom. 2010;79(3):136-48 - PubMed
  31. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Dec;64(6):615-24 - PubMed
  32. Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Mar;22(2):155-68 - PubMed
  33. Nurse Educ Today. 1991 Dec;11(6):461-6 - PubMed
  34. Health Commun. 2000;12(1):63-80 - PubMed
  35. Scand J Caring Sci. 2001;15(2):142-50 - PubMed

Publication Types