Display options
Cite
Stites MC, Federmeier KD, Christianson K. Do Morphemes Matter when Reading Compound Words with Transposed Letters? Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Event-Related Potentials. Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(10):1299-1319doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1212082.
Stites, M. C., Federmeier, K. D., & Christianson, K. (2016). Do Morphemes Matter when Reading Compound Words with Transposed Letters? Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Event-Related Potentials. Language, cognition and neuroscience, 31(10), 1299-1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1212082
Stites, Mallory C, et al. "Do Morphemes Matter when Reading Compound Words with Transposed Letters? Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Event-Related Potentials." Language, cognition and neuroscience vol. 31,10 (2016): 1299-1319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1212082
Stites MC, Federmeier KD, Christianson K. Do Morphemes Matter when Reading Compound Words with Transposed Letters? Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Event-Related Potentials. Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(10):1299-1319. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1212082. Epub 2016 Aug 06. PMID: 28791313; PMCID: PMC5544032.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(10):1299-1319. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1212082. Epub 2016 Aug 06.

Do Morphemes Matter when Reading Compound Words with Transposed Letters? Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Event-Related Potentials.

Language, cognition and neuroscience

Mallory C Stites, Kara D Federmeier, Kiel Christianson

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
  2. Program in Neuroscience, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
  3. Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
  4. Department of Educational Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

PMID: 28791313 PMCID: PMC5544032 DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1212082

Abstract

The current study investigates the online processing consequences of encountering compound words with transposed letters (TLs), to determine if TLs that cross morpheme boundaries are more disruptive to reading than those within a single morpheme, as would be predicted by accounts of obligatory morpho-orthopgrahic decomposition. Two measures of online processing, eye movements and event-related potentials (ERPs), were collected in separate experiments. Participants read sentences containing correctly spelled compound words (

Keywords: ERPs; LPC/P600; compound words; eye movements; morphological processing

References

  1. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013 Jun;13(2):355-70 - PubMed
  2. Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;17(12):1021-6 - PubMed
  3. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Dec;19(12):1983-93 - PubMed
  4. Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 13;2:54 - PubMed
  5. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jan;74(1):5-35 - PubMed
  6. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(13):1963-74 - PubMed
  7. Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Dec;3(4):504-9 - PubMed
  8. Neurosci Lett. 2007 Jun 4;419(3):219-24 - PubMed
  9. Lang Linguist Compass. 2009 Jan 1;3(1):128-156 - PubMed
  10. Neuroreport. 2009 Mar 4;20(4):381-7 - PubMed
  11. Lang Cogn Process. 2010 May 1;26(4-6):558-599 - PubMed
  12. Brain Lang. 2008 Nov;107(2):170-8 - PubMed
  13. J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2012;24(4):476-495 - PubMed
  14. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Feb;21(2):275-88 - PubMed
  15. Br J Psychol. 2003 May;94(Pt 2):223-44 - PubMed
  16. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 May;19(5):866-77 - PubMed
  17. Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):356-66 - PubMed
  18. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):534-41 - PubMed
  19. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Oct;20(5):988-96 - PubMed
  20. Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2350-63 - PubMed
  21. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec;24(6):1612-27 - PubMed
  22. Neuropsychologia. 1998 Mar;36(3):217-26 - PubMed
  23. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Mar;41(2):586-95 - PubMed
  24. Brain Res. 2014 Sep 4;1579:45-55 - PubMed
  25. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23 (2):533-9 - PubMed
  26. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2014;31(1-2):123-46 - PubMed
  27. Mem Cognit. 2003 Sep;31(6):829-41 - PubMed
  28. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1327-39 - PubMed
  29. Lang Cogn Process. 2011 Jan 1;26(4-6):482-508 - PubMed
  30. Psychophysiology. 2007 Jul;44(4):506-21 - PubMed
  31. Brain. 1999 Nov;122 ( Pt 11):2119-32 - PubMed
  32. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1999 Jan;7(3):241-53 - PubMed
  33. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Nov;76(8):2424-40 - PubMed
  34. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1090-8 - PubMed
  35. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Sep;22(9):2042-57 - PubMed
  36. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Nov;141(3):336-51 - PubMed
  37. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 May;7(5):187-189 - PubMed
  38. Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):895-908 - PubMed
  39. Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:75-84 - PubMed
  40. Br J Psychol. 2008 Feb;99(Pt 1):87-107 - PubMed
  41. J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):null - PubMed
  42. Cognition. 2007 Dec;105(3):691-703 - PubMed
  43. Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 12;3:232 - PubMed
  44. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):684-91 - PubMed
  45. Brain Lang. 2013 Aug;126(2):217-29 - PubMed
  46. Exp Psychol. 2008;55(6):384-93 - PubMed
  47. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(12):2389-410 - PubMed
  48. Psychophysiology. 2011 May;48(5):676-86 - PubMed
  49. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008 Jun;25(4):559-81 - PubMed
  50. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47 - PubMed
  51. Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):204-56 - PubMed
  52. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Aug;38(4):811-6 - PubMed
  53. Brain Res. 2009 Feb 27;1257:53-64 - PubMed
  54. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 12;101(41):14984-8 - PubMed
  55. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct;34(5):1261-76 - PubMed
  56. Neuroreport. 2010 Mar 31;21(5):319-23 - PubMed
  57. Brain Lang. 2013 Apr;125(1):11-27 - PubMed
  58. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jul;20(4):804-23 - PubMed
  59. Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):577-600 - PubMed
  60. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 7;102(23):8375-80 - PubMed
  61. Brain Res. 2006 Aug 23;1106(1):150-63 - PubMed
  62. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1557-75 - PubMed
  63. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Aug;22(4):1054-61 - PubMed
  64. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Sep;19(9):1464-75 - PubMed
  65. Mem Cognit. 2012 May;40(4):628-41 - PubMed
  66. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(9):1798-819 - PubMed
  67. Brain Lang. 2011 Sep;118(3):105-17 - PubMed
  68. Nature. 1984 Jan 12-18;307(5947):161-3 - PubMed
  69. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):219-32 - PubMed
  70. Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):192-3 - PubMed
  71. Lang Cogn Process. 2008 Nov 1;23(7):1021-1056 - PubMed
  72. J Mem Lang. 2009 Oct 1;61(3):326-338 - PubMed
  73. Nature. 1964 Jul 25;203:380-4 - PubMed
  74. Neurosci Lett. 2002 Feb 1;318(3):149-52 - PubMed
  75. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Mar;42(3):411-32 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support