Display options
Share it on

EXCLI J. 2017 Jul 03;16:995-1008. doi: 10.17179/excli2017-405. eCollection 2017.

Meta-analysis of neuron specific enolase in predicting pediatric brain injury outcomes.

EXCLI journal

Babak Nakhjavan-Shahraki, Mahmoud Yousefifard, Alireza Oraii, Arash Sarveazad, Mostafa Hosseini

Affiliations

  1. Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  2. Physiology Research Center and Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  3. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  4. Colorectal Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

PMID: 28900380 PMCID: PMC5579403 DOI: 10.17179/excli2017-405

Abstract

A reliable biomarker has not been identified to predict the outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in children. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between neuron specific enolase (NSE) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) in children. Two independent reviewers searched electronic databases of EMBASE, Cochrane library, Medline and Scopus and then they summarized the results and did a quality control check. At the end, standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) and performance of NSE were assessed. 10 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. Average serum (SMD=1.3; 95 % CI: 0.5 to 2.1; p=0.001) and CSF levels (SMD=2.45; 95 % CI: 1.04 to 3.8; p<0.0001) of NSE biomarker were significantly higher in children with TBI with unfavorable outcome compared with other children. Serum NSE had an area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity of 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.72 to 0.79), 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.64 to 0.82) and 0.69 (95 % CI: 0.59 to 0.77), respectively in prediction outcome of TBI. Positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio of serum NSE were 2.4 (95 % CI: 1.7 to 3.3), 0.38 (95 % CI: 0.26 to 0.55) and 6.0 (95 % CI: 3.0 to 12.0), respectively. The results show that the performance of NSE is in a moderate level in prediction of unfavorable outcome in children with TBI. However, data in this aspect is not sufficient and more studies are needed.

Keywords: biomarker; pediatric; traumatic brain injury

References

  1. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Sep;21(9):1537-44 - PubMed
  2. Neurocrit Care. 2015 Feb;22(1):52-64 - PubMed
  3. BMC Nephrol. 2017 Apr 3;18(1):120 - PubMed
  4. Metab Brain Dis. 2016 Jun;31(3):487-95 - PubMed
  5. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May;31(5):929-35 - PubMed
  6. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2016 Apr;20(2):153-61 - PubMed
  7. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 04;9(9):e106680 - PubMed
  8. World Neurosurg. 2014 Jan;81(1):151-8 - PubMed
  9. Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;43(4):1272-83 - PubMed
  10. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36 - PubMed
  11. Tanaffos. 2014;13(4):29-40 - PubMed
  12. Emerg (Tehran). 2016 Spring;4(2):55-64 - PubMed
  13. Pediatrics. 2017 Apr;139(4):null - PubMed
  14. J Neurotrauma. 2003 Aug;20(8):781-6 - PubMed
  15. Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Jul;7(7):816-20 - PubMed
  16. Semin Neurol. 1994 Mar;14(1):8-18 - PubMed
  17. JAMA. 2000 Apr 19;283(15):2008-12 - PubMed
  18. Front Neurol. 2013 Apr 26;4:40 - PubMed
  19. Pediatrics. 2002 Feb;109(2):E31 - PubMed
  20. Emerg (Tehran). 2016 Summer;4(3):116-26 - PubMed
  21. Emerg (Tehran). 2015 Fall;3(4):127-36 - PubMed
  22. Emerg (Tehran). 2017;5(1):e37 - PubMed
  23. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Aug;12(8):732-8 - PubMed
  24. Neurocrit Care. 2014 Jun;20(3):427-35 - PubMed
  25. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009 Oct;4(4):339-44 - PubMed
  26. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Mar 17;66(9):1-16 - PubMed
  27. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64 - PubMed
  28. Emerg (Tehran). 2016 Winter;4(1):1-10 - PubMed
  29. J Neurosurg. 2005 Jul;103(1 Suppl):61-8 - PubMed
  30. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 May;33(5):805-811 - PubMed
  31. Stat Med. 2011 Feb 28;30(5):560-8 - PubMed
  32. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Jan;154(1):93-103; discussion 103 - PubMed
  33. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 May;174(5):1241-4 - PubMed
  34. Neurol Res. 2016 Feb;38(2):130-7 - PubMed
  35. CMAJ Open. 2016 Jul 22;4(3):E371-E382 - PubMed
  36. Neurology. 2009 Feb 17;72(7):609-16 - PubMed
  37. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Apr 20;5:13 - PubMed
  38. BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34 - PubMed
  39. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2010 Aug;46(2):82-8 - PubMed
  40. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016 Aug;12(8):477-85 - PubMed
  41. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016 Dec;78:102-111 - PubMed
  42. J Neurotrauma. 2007 Jan;24(1):75-86 - PubMed
  43. Neuroscience. 2016 May 13;322:377-97 - PubMed
  44. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul;17(7):638-48 - PubMed
  45. J Child Neurol. 2016 Jan;31(1):20-7 - PubMed
  46. J Neurotrauma. 2010 Dec;27(12):2139-45 - PubMed

Publication Types