Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 29;8:1438. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01438. eCollection 2017.

Shaving Bridges and Tuning Kitaraa: The Effect of Language Switching on Semantic Processing.

Frontiers in psychology

Suzanne C A Hut, Alina Leminen

Affiliations

  1. Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of HelsinkiHelsinki, Finland.
  2. Institute of Behavioural Sciences, University of HelsinkiHelsinki, Finland.
  3. Department of Clinical Medicine, Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus UniversityAarhus, Denmark.

PMID: 28900402 PMCID: PMC5581842 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01438

Abstract

Language switching has been repeatedly found to be costly. Yet, there are reasons to believe that switches in language might benefit language comprehension in some groups of people, such as less proficient language learners. This study therefore investigated the interplay between language switching and semantic processing in groups with varying language proficiency. EEG was recorded while L2 learners of English with intermediate and high proficiency levels read semantically congruent or incongruent sentences in L2. Translations of congruent and incongruent target words were additionally presented in L1 to create intrasentential language switches. A control group of English native speakers was tested in order to compare responses to non-switched stimuli with those of L2 learners. An omnibus ANOVA including all groups revealed larger N400 responses for non-switched incongruent stimuli compared to congruent stimuli. Additionally, despite switches to L1 at target word position, semantic N400 responses were still elicited in both L2 learner groups. Further switching effects were reflected by an N400-like effect and a late positivity complex, pointing to possible parsing efforts after language switches. Our results therefore show that although language switches are associated with increased mental effort, switches may not necessarily be costly on the semantic level. This finding contributes to the ongoing discussion on language inhibition processes, and shows that, in these intermediate and high proficient L2 learners, semantic processes look similar to those of native speakers of English.

Keywords: ERP; LPC; N400; language switching; proficiency; second-language learners; semantic processing; semantics

References

  1. Science. 1980 Jan 11;207(4427):203-5 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Apr;19(2):113-24 - PubMed
  3. Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 15;90:348-59 - PubMed
  4. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Aug 15;15(6):883-99 - PubMed
  5. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Sep;32(5):1057-74 - PubMed
  6. Brain Lang. 2008 Jun;105(3):161-74 - PubMed
  7. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Dec;29(6):1155-78 - PubMed
  8. Cognition. 2009 Jan;110(1):84-99 - PubMed
  9. Brain Lang. 1990 Aug;39(2):187-205 - PubMed
  10. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1793-806 - PubMed
  11. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Mar;16(2):301-17 - PubMed
  12. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(12):1636-56 - PubMed
  13. Psychol Sci. 2011 Sep;22(9):1155-64 - PubMed
  14. J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Summer;8(3):231-56 - PubMed
  15. Brain Res. 2014 Jan 13;1542:111-30 - PubMed
  16. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Oct;18(10):1631-43 - PubMed
  17. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1630-45 - PubMed
  18. Brain Lang. 2002 Feb;80(2):188-207 - PubMed
  19. J Exp Psychol. 1968 Oct;78(2):208-15 - PubMed
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 24;104(30):12530-5 - PubMed
  21. J Psycholinguist Res. 2013 Apr;42(2):103-18 - PubMed
  22. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1165-86 - PubMed
  23. Brain Lang. 2015 Mar;142:8-17 - PubMed
  24. Psychophysiology. 2011 Jan;48(1):44-54 - PubMed
  25. Brain Res. 2014 Apr 4;1557:127-40 - PubMed
  26. Brain Res Rev. 2010 Sep;64(1):104-22 - PubMed
  27. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):284-92 - PubMed
  28. Front Psychol. 2013 May 30;4:278 - PubMed
  29. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jul;128(3):466-78 - PubMed
  30. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;72(2):184-7 - PubMed
  31. Neuroimage. 2008 Jul 1;41(3):1111-9 - PubMed
  32. Psychophysiology. 2009 May;46(3):551-65 - PubMed
  33. Mem Cognit. 1984 Jul;12(4):380-6 - PubMed
  34. J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2013 Aug;25(5):515-530 - PubMed
  35. Cortex. 2013 May;49(5):1252-8 - PubMed

Publication Types