Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Sep 29;5(4). doi: 10.3390/healthcare5040068.
Three Types of Intimate Relationships among Individuals with Chronic Pain and a History of Trauma Exposure.
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
Carissa van den Berk-Clark, Terri L Weaver, F David Schneider
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA. [email protected].
- Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University School of Arts and Sciences, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. [email protected].
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. [email protected].
PMID: 28961164
PMCID: PMC5746702 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare5040068
Abstract
Individuals with chronic pain often have psychiatric disorders, such as depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which can affect their intimate relationship satisfaction and stability. Little is known about the nature of support stemming from chronic pain patients' intimate relationships, and therefore, this study sought to: (1) use cluster modeling to construct specific intimate relationship groups based on types of support patients receive, and (2) determine if there is a relationship between support type and PTSD, chronic pain, anxiety, and depression. Ward's method of cluster analysis in Stata was used to create groups based on the level of informational, affirmation, confident, emotional, and fun support received from chronic pain patients' most intimate relationship. Three types of support were identified: high (type 1, n = 17), high emotional/low instrumental (type 2, n = 9), and unstable (type 3, n = 15). Types 1 and 3 included more family members (Type 1: 100%, Type 2: 93%), than type 2 (77%). Type 2 patients experienced more trauma (Mean = 9.4 ± 1.7 vs. 7.5 ± 0.88 for types 1 and 3) and were significantly more likely to have PTSD (X² = 7.91,
Keywords: PTSD; chronic pain; social support; trauma
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Psychol Bull. 1985 Sep;98(2):310-57 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jan;21(1):65-7 - PubMed
- J Gerontol. 1987 Sep;42(5):519-27 - PubMed
- Behav Res Ther. 2009 Mar;47(3):237-44 - PubMed
- Am J Prev Med. 1998 May;14(4):245-58 - PubMed
- Pain. 2012 Aug;153(8):1735-41 - PubMed
- J Pain. 2014 Oct;15(10):979-84 - PubMed
- Rehabil Psychol. 2010 May;55(2):194-203 - PubMed
- Eur Respir J. 2011 May;37(5):1068-75 - PubMed
- Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Mar;20(1):e1-5 - PubMed
- Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Apr;37:57-71 - PubMed
- J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98 - PubMed
- J Trauma Stress. 2008 Aug;21(4):394-401 - PubMed
- Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Oct;130(4):623-31 - PubMed
- Psychol Bull. 2003 Jan;129(1):52-73 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2013 Nov 19;8(11):e80573 - PubMed
- J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Sep-Oct;40(5):397-405 - PubMed
- Heart Lung. 2011 May-Jun;40(3):193-200 - PubMed
- J Pain. 2015 Aug;16(8):769-80 - PubMed
Publication Types