Display options
Share it on

Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Sep 29;5(4). doi: 10.3390/healthcare5040068.

Three Types of Intimate Relationships among Individuals with Chronic Pain and a History of Trauma Exposure.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)

Carissa van den Berk-Clark, Terri L Weaver, F David Schneider

Affiliations

  1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA. [email protected].
  2. Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University School of Arts and Sciences, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. [email protected].
  3. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 28961164 PMCID: PMC5746702 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare5040068

Abstract

Individuals with chronic pain often have psychiatric disorders, such as depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which can affect their intimate relationship satisfaction and stability. Little is known about the nature of support stemming from chronic pain patients' intimate relationships, and therefore, this study sought to: (1) use cluster modeling to construct specific intimate relationship groups based on types of support patients receive, and (2) determine if there is a relationship between support type and PTSD, chronic pain, anxiety, and depression. Ward's method of cluster analysis in Stata was used to create groups based on the level of informational, affirmation, confident, emotional, and fun support received from chronic pain patients' most intimate relationship. Three types of support were identified: high (type 1, n = 17), high emotional/low instrumental (type 2, n = 9), and unstable (type 3, n = 15). Types 1 and 3 included more family members (Type 1: 100%, Type 2: 93%), than type 2 (77%). Type 2 patients experienced more trauma (Mean = 9.4 ± 1.7 vs. 7.5 ± 0.88 for types 1 and 3) and were significantly more likely to have PTSD (X² = 7.91,

Keywords: PTSD; chronic pain; social support; trauma

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Psychol Bull. 1985 Sep;98(2):310-57 - PubMed
  2. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13 - PubMed
  3. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jan;21(1):65-7 - PubMed
  4. J Gerontol. 1987 Sep;42(5):519-27 - PubMed
  5. Behav Res Ther. 2009 Mar;47(3):237-44 - PubMed
  6. Am J Prev Med. 1998 May;14(4):245-58 - PubMed
  7. Pain. 2012 Aug;153(8):1735-41 - PubMed
  8. J Pain. 2014 Oct;15(10):979-84 - PubMed
  9. Rehabil Psychol. 2010 May;55(2):194-203 - PubMed
  10. Eur Respir J. 2011 May;37(5):1068-75 - PubMed
  11. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Mar;20(1):e1-5 - PubMed
  12. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Apr;37:57-71 - PubMed
  13. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98 - PubMed
  14. J Trauma Stress. 2008 Aug;21(4):394-401 - PubMed
  15. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Oct;130(4):623-31 - PubMed
  16. Psychol Bull. 2003 Jan;129(1):52-73 - PubMed
  17. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 19;8(11):e80573 - PubMed
  18. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Sep-Oct;40(5):397-405 - PubMed
  19. Heart Lung. 2011 May-Jun;40(3):193-200 - PubMed
  20. J Pain. 2015 Aug;16(8):769-80 - PubMed

Publication Types