Display options
Share it on

Open Med Inform J. 2017 Jul 28;11:12-19. doi: 10.2174/1874431101711010012. eCollection 2017.

Complex Coronary Hemodynamics - Simple Analog Modelling as an Educational Tool.

The open medical informatics journal

Gaurav R Parikh, Elvis Peter, Nikolaos Kakouros

Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Massachusetts, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA, 01655. USA.
  2. Department of Cardiology, Marshfield Clinic, Weston Center 3501 Cranberry Blvd, Weston, WI 54476, USA.

PMID: 28932342 PMCID: PMC5585460 DOI: 10.2174/1874431101711010012

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Invasive coronary angiography remains the cornerstone for evaluation of coronary stenoses despite there being a poor correlation between luminal loss assessment by coronary luminography and myocardial ischemia. This is especially true for coronary lesions deemed moderate by visual assessment. Coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) has emerged as the gold standard for the evaluation of hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis, which is cost effective and leads to improved patient outcomes. There are, however, several limitations to the use of FFR including the evaluation of serial stenoses.

METHOD: In this article, we discuss the electronic-hydraulic analogy and the utility of simple electrical modelling to mimic the coronary circulation and coronary stenoses. We exemplify the effect of tandem coronary lesions on the FFR by modelling of a patient with sequential disease segments and complex anatomy.

RESULTS: We believe that such computational modelling can serve as a powerful educational tool to help clinicians better understand the complexity of coronary hemodynamics and improve patient care.

Keywords: Computational modelling; Coronary angiography; Coronary hemodynamics; Educational tools; Myocardial fractional flow reserve; System equivalence

References

  1. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec;3(12):1274-81 - PubMed
  2. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1975 Jul;22(4):327-34 - PubMed
  3. Eur Radiol. 2013 Apr;23 (4):958-67 - PubMed
  4. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2014 Feb;10(1):57-64 - PubMed
  5. Am Heart J. 1977 Aug;94(2):183-8 - PubMed
  6. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):177-84 - PubMed
  7. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;6(2):128-30 - PubMed
  8. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 29;49(21):2105-11 - PubMed
  9. Cardiovasc Clin. 1977;8(2):71-84 - PubMed
  10. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1984 Jan;62(1):59-69 - PubMed
  11. Circulation. 1981 Feb;63(2):285-99 - PubMed
  12. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Nov 16;44(10):2089-91 - PubMed
  13. Circulation. 2000 Apr 18;101(15):1840-7 - PubMed
  14. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 27;334(26):1703-8 - PubMed
  15. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2006 Jul;150(1):105-12 - PubMed
  16. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015 Sep;17(9):52 - PubMed
  17. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001 - PubMed

Publication Types