Display options
Cite
Walker L, Baumgartner L, Keller KC, et al. Non-human primate and rodent embryonic stem cells are differentially sensitive to embryotoxic compounds. Toxicol Rep. 2014;2:165-174doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.11.016.
Walker, L., Baumgartner, L., Keller, K. C., Ast, J., Trettner, S., & Zur Nieden, N. I. (2015). Non-human primate and rodent embryonic stem cells are differentially sensitive to embryotoxic compounds. Toxicology reports, 2165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.11.016
Walker, Lauren, et al. "Non-human primate and rodent embryonic stem cells are differentially sensitive to embryotoxic compounds." Toxicology reports vol. 2 (2015): 165-174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.11.016
Walker L, Baumgartner L, Keller KC, Ast J, Trettner S, Zur Nieden NI. Non-human primate and rodent embryonic stem cells are differentially sensitive to embryotoxic compounds. Toxicol Rep. 2014 Dec 31;2:165-174. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.11.016. eCollection 2015. PMID: 28962348; PMCID: PMC5598278.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Toxicol Rep. 2014 Dec 31;2:165-174. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.11.016. eCollection 2015.

Non-human primate and rodent embryonic stem cells are differentially sensitive to embryotoxic compounds.

Toxicology reports

Lauren Walker, Laura Baumgartner, Kevin C Keller, Julia Ast, Susanne Trettner, Nicole I Zur Nieden

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cell Biology & Neuroscience and Stem Cell Center, College of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
  2. Environmental Toxicology Graduate Program, College of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
  3. Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy & Immunology, Perlickstrasse 1, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

PMID: 28962348 PMCID: PMC5598278 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.11.016

Abstract

Many industrial chemicals and their respective by-products need to be comprehensively evaluated for toxicity using reliable and efficient assays. In terms of teratogenicity evaluations, the murine-based embryonic stem cell test (EST) offers a promising solution to screen for multiple tissue endpoints. However, use of a mouse model in the EST can yield only a limited understanding of human development, anatomy, and physiology. Non-human primate or human

Keywords: Embryonic stem cell test; Embryotoxicity; Marmoset; Osteogenesis; Rhesus; Sensitivity

References

  1. Altern Lab Anim. 2008 May;36(2):129-40 - PubMed
  2. Arch Toxicol. 1999 Sep;73(7):359-66 - PubMed
  3. Int J Dev Biol. 2010;54(11-12):1729-41 - PubMed
  4. Stem Cells. 2011 Mar;29(3):486-95 - PubMed
  5. Toxicol In Vitro. 1999 Aug-Oct;13(4-5):675-81 - PubMed
  6. Cell Stem Cell. 2014 Sep 4;15(3):295-309 - PubMed
  7. Arch Toxicol. 1992;66(10):706-12 - PubMed
  8. Toxicol In Vitro. 2007 Dec;21(8):1631-40 - PubMed
  9. ILAR J. 2011;52(1):78-88 - PubMed
  10. J Appl Toxicol. 2015 Feb;35(2):205-18 - PubMed
  11. Trends Genet. 1989 Aug;5(8):246-51 - PubMed
  12. Reprod Toxicol. 2010 Sep;30(2):277-83 - PubMed
  13. Osteoporos Int. 2014 Apr;25(4):1255-66 - PubMed
  14. Toxicol In Vitro. 2012 Sep;26(6):970-8 - PubMed
  15. Development. 2006 Aug;133(16):3231-44 - PubMed
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 26;110(9):3507-12 - PubMed
  17. Stem Cells Dev. 2011 Mar;20(3):465-74 - PubMed
  18. Am J Anat. 1960 Mar;106:89-96 - PubMed
  19. EXS. 2009;99:401-52 - PubMed
  20. Altern Lab Anim. 2002 Mar-Apr;30(2):177-98 - PubMed
  21. Science. 1998 Nov 6;282(5391):1145-7 - PubMed
  22. Altern Lab Anim. 2004 Sep;32(3):209-44 - PubMed
  23. Mol Endocrinol. 2007 Mar;21(3):674-85 - PubMed
  24. Nat Protoc. 2011 Jun 16;6(7):961-78 - PubMed
  25. Hum Reprod. 2009 Jun;24(6):1359-72 - PubMed
  26. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010 Aug 15;247(1):18-27 - PubMed
  27. Stem Cells. 2005 Oct;23(9):1304-13 - PubMed
  28. J Mol Cell Biol. 2011 Jun;3(3):197-9 - PubMed
  29. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004 Feb 1;194(3):257-69 - PubMed
  30. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1994 May;126(1):129-44 - PubMed
  31. Biol Reprod. 1996 Aug;55(2):254-9 - PubMed
  32. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Jul 15;137(6):747-9 - PubMed
  33. Nature. 2005 Sep 1;437(7055):69-87 - PubMed
  34. In Vitr Mol Toxicol. 2000 Spring;13(1):51-66 - PubMed
  35. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;690:255-72 - PubMed
  36. Toxicology. 2010 Nov 9;277(1-3):66-73 - PubMed
  37. Environ Health Perspect. 1985 Sep;61:55-67 - PubMed
  38. J Pediatr. 1984 Oct;105(4):595-7 - PubMed
  39. Reprod Toxicol. 2004 Mar-Apr;18(2):231-40 - PubMed
  40. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;889:147-79 - PubMed
  41. Lancet. 1992 Feb 29;339(8792):530-3 - PubMed
  42. Development. 2006 Oct;133(19):3787-96 - PubMed
  43. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2012 Dec;150(1-3):502-8 - PubMed
  44. Toxicology. 2013 Dec 6;314(1):135-47 - PubMed
  45. Reprod Toxicol. 2014 Sep;48:62-71 - PubMed
  46. Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Aug;104 Suppl 4:741-803 - PubMed
  47. Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Jun;119(6):878-85 - PubMed
  48. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010 Sep 1;247(2):91-7 - PubMed
  49. Nature. 2010 Sep 16;467(7313):285-90 - PubMed
  50. Differentiation. 2003 Jan;71(1):18-27 - PubMed
  51. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;889:7-13 - PubMed
  52. Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Aug;28(8):848-55 - PubMed
  53. World J Pediatr. 2014 May;10(2):101-7 - PubMed

Publication Types