Display options
Share it on

Front Physiol. 2017 Aug 28;8:571. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00571. eCollection 2017.

Chronic Intermittent Hypoxia Differentially Impacts Different States of Inspiratory Activity at the Level of the preBötzinger Complex.

Frontiers in physiology

Alfredo J Garcia, Tatiana Dashevskiy, Maggie A Khuu, Jan-Marino Ramirez

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Integrative Physiology, The University of ChicagoChicago, IL, United States.
  2. Department of Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, The University of ChicagoChicago, IL, United States.
  3. Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research InstituteSeattle, WA, United States.
  4. Departments of Neurological Surgery and Pediatrics, University of WashingtonSeattle, WA, United States.

PMID: 28936176 PMCID: PMC5603985 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00571

Abstract

The preBötzinger complex (preBötC) is a medullary brainstem network crucially involved in the generation of different inspiratory rhythms. In the isolated brainstem slice, the preBötC reconfigures to produce different rhythms that we refer to as "fictive eupnea" under baseline conditions (i.e., carbogen), and "fictive gasping" in hypoxia. We recently demonstrated that fictive eupnea is irregular following exposure to chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH). However, it is unknown how CIH impacts fictive gasping. To address this, brain slices containing the preBötC were prepared from control and CIH exposed mice. Electrophysiological recordings of rhythmogenesis were obtained during the perihypoxic interval. We examined how CIH affects various dynamic aspects of the rhythm characterized by: (1) the irregularity score (IrS), to assess burst-to-variability; (2) the fluctuation value (χ), to quantify the gain of oscillations throughout the time series; and (3) Sample Entropy (sENT), to characterize the pattern/structure of oscillations in the time series. In baseline conditions, CIH increased IrS of amplitude (0.21 ± 0.2) and χ of amplitude (0.34 ± 0.02) but did not affect sENT of amplitude. This indicated that CIH increased burst-to-burst irregularity and the gain of amplitude fluctuations but did not affect the overall pattern/structure of amplitude oscillations. During the transition to hypoxia, 33% of control rhythms whereas 64% of CIH-exposed rhythms showed no doubling of period, suggesting that the probability for stable rhythmogenesis during the transition to hypoxia was greater following CIH. While 29% of control rhythms maintained rhythmicity throughout hypoxia, all slices from CIH exposed mice exhibited rhythms throughout the hypoxic interval. During hypoxia, differences in χ for amplitude were no longer observed between groups. To test the contribution of the persistent sodium current, we examined how riluzole influenced rhythmogenesis following CIH. In networks exposed to CIH, riluzole reduced the IrS of amplitude (-24 ± 14%) yet increased IrS of period (+49 ± 17%). Our data indicate that CIH affects the preBötC, in a manner dependent on the state of the oxygenation. Along with known changes that CIH has on peripheral sensory organs, the effects of CIH on the preBötC may have important implications for sleep apnea, a condition characterized by rapid transitions between normoxia and hypoxia.

Keywords: brain; chronic intermittent hypoxia; hypoxia; preBötzinger complex; rhythmicity; sleep apnea syndromes

References

  1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Nov;97(5):2020-5 - PubMed
  2. Lancet. 2002 Jul 20;360(9328):237-45 - PubMed
  3. J Perinatol. 2016 Apr;36(4):251-8 - PubMed
  4. J Neurophysiol. 2008 May;99(5):2114-25 - PubMed
  5. Prog Brain Res. 2007;165:201-20 - PubMed
  6. J Neurophysiol. 2013 Jan;109(2):285-95 - PubMed
  7. Front Neurosci. 2016 Feb 04;10:4 - PubMed
  8. J Physiol. 1995 Mar 15;483 ( Pt 3):769-81 - PubMed
  9. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000 Jun;278(6):H2039-49 - PubMed
  10. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 21;69(7):841-858 - PubMed
  11. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Sep;109(3):804-19 - PubMed
  12. J Neurophysiol. 2002 Jul;88(1):206-13 - PubMed
  13. Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):e1161-7 - PubMed
  14. Nat Neurosci. 2001 Sep;4(9):927-30 - PubMed
  15. Neuron. 2004 Jul 8;43(1):105-17 - PubMed
  16. J Neurophysiol. 2002 Jun;87(6):2964-71 - PubMed
  17. J Neurosci Res. 2014 Mar;92 (3):375-88 - PubMed
  18. J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 15;29(15):4903-10 - PubMed
  19. Front Neural Circuits. 2013 Nov 12;7:179 - PubMed
  20. J Physiol. 2015 Oct 1;593(19):4373-86 - PubMed
  21. Neuron. 2002 May 30;34(5):821-30 - PubMed
  22. J Neurosci. 2016 Jul 27;36(30):7877-85 - PubMed
  23. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2016 Mar;54(3):299-305 - PubMed
  24. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Oct 1;121(4):944-952 - PubMed
  25. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 May;112(10 ):1678-88 - PubMed
  26. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Mar;95(3):1334-44 - PubMed
  27. Front Physiol. 2014 Jul 23;5:265 - PubMed
  28. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Mar;92 (3):1141-4 - PubMed
  29. Pediatr Res. 2006 Dec;60(6):680-6 - PubMed
  30. Sleep Med Clin. 2016 Sep;11(3):287-98 - PubMed
  31. J Physiol. 1998 Mar 15;507 ( Pt 3):895-907 - PubMed
  32. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009 Aug 31;168(1-2):158-78 - PubMed
  33. Nat Neurosci. 2008 May;11(5):538-40 - PubMed
  34. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2014 Nov 15;307(10 ):R1181-97 - PubMed
  35. J Neurophysiol. 2011 Feb;105(2):625-39 - PubMed
  36. J Physiol. 2011 Sep 15;589(Pt 18):4583-600 - PubMed
  37. Physiol Rev. 2010 Jan;90(1):47-112 - PubMed
  38. J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 1;34(1):36-50 - PubMed
  39. Compr Physiol. 2012 Oct;2(4):2683-731 - PubMed
  40. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Mar;95(3):1323-33 - PubMed
  41. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jun;3(6):600-7 - PubMed
  42. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2013 Nov 1;189(2):344-53 - PubMed
  43. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 08;8(4):e60695 - PubMed
  44. Sleep Med Rev. 2015 Aug;22:3-14 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support