Display options
Share it on

Intern Med Rev (Wash D C). 2017 May;3(5). doi: 10.18103/imr.v3i5.462.

Illustrating and analyzing the processes of multi-institutional collaboration: Lessons learnt at Howard University Hospital.

Internal medicine review (Washington, D.C. : Online)

Mansoor Malik, Suneeta Kumari, Partam Manalai, Maria Hipolito, Bruyndonckx

Affiliations

  1. Howard University Hospital Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health Sciences Washington DC.

PMID: 28966991 PMCID: PMC5617338 DOI: 10.18103/imr.v3i5.462

Abstract

Multi-institutional collaboration offers a promising approach to the dissemination of resources for capacity building and the improvement of the training of new investigators and residents, especially in areas of novel curricular content. Physicians should keep pace with the rapid growth of curricular content in an era of restricted resources. Such collaborations, in which educational entities work together and share resources and infrastructure, have been employed in health care to improve quality of care, capacity building, disparity reduction, and resident training. This paper examines a federally funded multi-institutional collaboration for the project STRIDE (Seek, Treat, Reach to Identify Pretrial Defendants Enhancement) between Yale University, George Mason University (GMU), and Howard University, a Historically Black University. The STRIDE study collaboration focused on mental health, opioid addiction, and infectious disease/HIV among Africans Americans involved in CJS (Criminal Justice System). We discuss some of the challenges and benefits of collaborative research projects conducted at Historically Black Colleges and University (HBCUs) and highlight the educational opportunities created by such collaborations for residents and other trainees, leading to the development of independent investigators through multi-institutional, structured collaborative research. We identify some unique challenges such as substance use, race, stigma, incarceration among participants, and the cultural and power difference between participating institutions, and thereby address these issues and how it impacted the course of the multi-institutional collaborative effort.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors have no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

References

  1. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jul;63(612):342-3 - PubMed
  2. Ear Hear. 2015 Nov-Dec;36 Suppl 1:99S-101S - PubMed
  3. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;37(2):307-13 - PubMed
  4. Am J Public Health. 2009 Apr;99 Suppl 1:S60-5 - PubMed
  5. N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 11;351(20):2049-57 - PubMed
  6. Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):1015-9 - PubMed
  7. AIDS Behav. 2008 Sep;12(5):748-58 - PubMed
  8. Health Policy. 2006 Jul;77(2):149-65 - PubMed
  9. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Dec;55 Suppl 1:S49-55 - PubMed
  10. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 11;356(2):157-65 - PubMed
  11. PLoS Med. 2006 Feb;3(2):e19 - PubMed
  12. Am J Public Health. 2009 Apr;99 Suppl 1:S57-60 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support