Display options
Cite
Takasaki H, Gabel CP. Cross-cultural adaptation of the 12-item Örebro musculoskeletal screening questionnaire to Japanese (ÖMSQ-12-J), reliability and clinicians' impressions for practicality. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(8):1409-1415doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1409.
Takasaki, H., & Gabel, C. P. (2017). Cross-cultural adaptation of the 12-item Örebro musculoskeletal screening questionnaire to Japanese (ÖMSQ-12-J), reliability and clinicians' impressions for practicality. Journal of physical therapy science, 29(8), 1409-1415. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.1409
Takasaki, Hiroshi, and Gabel, Charles Philip. "Cross-cultural adaptation of the 12-item Örebro musculoskeletal screening questionnaire to Japanese (ÖMSQ-12-J), reliability and clinicians' impressions for practicality." Journal of physical therapy science vol. 29,8 (2017): 1409-1415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.1409
Takasaki H, Gabel CP. Cross-cultural adaptation of the 12-item Örebro musculoskeletal screening questionnaire to Japanese (ÖMSQ-12-J), reliability and clinicians' impressions for practicality. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Aug;29(8):1409-1415. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1409. Epub 2017 Aug 10. PMID: 28878473; PMCID: PMC5574346.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Aug;29(8):1409-1415. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1409. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the 12-item Örebro musculoskeletal screening questionnaire to Japanese (ÖMSQ-12-J), reliability and clinicians' impressions for practicality.

Journal of physical therapy science

Hiroshi Takasaki, Charles Philip Gabel

Affiliations

  1. Division of Physical Therapy, Saitama Prefectural University, Japan.
  2. Coolum Physiotherapy Clinic, Australia.

PMID: 28878473 PMCID: PMC5574346 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.29.1409

Abstract

[Purpose] To translate and culturally adapt the Örebro Musculoskeletal Screening Questionnaire (ÖMSQ-12) into Japanese (ÖMSQ-12-J), and to preliminarily investigate practicality from the clinicians' perspectives, and determine inter-session reliability. [Subjects and Methods] This study included four phases: cross-cultural adaptation (Phases 1-2); survey among 14 clinicians (two medical doctors and 12 physiotherapists) about the practicality of using the questionnaire in six perspectives (speed of evaluation/treatment; capacity to detect patients with yellow flags; attitude towards management with bio-psycho-social perspectives; quality of evaluation/treatment; considerations of communications with patients at history-taking, physical assessments and interventions; and general clinical usefulness) based on their experiences with patients (Phase 3); and investigation of inter-session reliability among 50 patients with musculoskeletal disorders (Phase 4). [Results] The ÖMSQ-12-J was developed in Phases 1-2 using the recommended international guidelines for cultural adaptation and translation. In Phase 3, most responses were in the 3-positive options (35.7-78.6%). In Phase 4, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for each item ranged from 0.71-0.99 and 0.92 for the total score. [Conclusion] This study developed the ÖMSQ-12-J, which has preliminary evidence of good practicality and moderate-strong inter-session reliability. Further investigation is required to determine the predictive and prognostic capacity within a problematic musculoskeletal Japanese population.

Keywords: Bio-psycho-social; Prognostic tool; Screening

References

  1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12 Suppl 2):S15-20 - PubMed
  2. Psychol Rep. 1966 Aug;19(1):3-11 - PubMed
  3. Eur J Pain. 2008 Jul;12(5):641-9 - PubMed
  4. Clin J Pain. 1998 Sep;14(3):209-15 - PubMed
  5. Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Nov;25(6):778-81 - PubMed
  6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Aug 1;41(15):E931-6 - PubMed
  7. Clin J Pain. 2003 Mar-Apr;19(2):80-6 - PubMed
  8. Phys Ther. 2016 Oct;96(10 ):1525-1532 - PubMed
  9. Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21 Suppl 6:S773-84 - PubMed
  10. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Feb;27:78-84 - PubMed
  11. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Aug 1;40(15):E913 - PubMed
  12. Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar;20(3):449-57 - PubMed
  13. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41(8):645-52 - PubMed
  14. Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1331-5 - PubMed
  15. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Apr 15;21(8):945-51 - PubMed
  16. J Chiropr Med. 2015 Mar;14(1):32-8 - PubMed
  17. J Occup Environ Med. 2007 Jan;49(1):59-67 - PubMed
  18. Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):737-53 - PubMed
  19. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Oct;27(5):649-61 - PubMed
  20. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Apr;34(4):187-93 - PubMed
  21. Man Ther. 2013 Oct;18(5):378-85 - PubMed
  22. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91 - PubMed
  23. Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8 - PubMed
  24. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Jun;28(3):353-66 - PubMed
  25. Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560-71 - PubMed
  26. Man Ther. 2012 Dec;17(6):554-65 - PubMed
  27. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Jan 09;10 :3 - PubMed
  28. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May 15;59(5):632-41 - PubMed

Publication Types