Display options
Share it on

JMIR Med Inform. 2017 Sep 14;5(3):e31. doi: 10.2196/medinform.7707.

System-Wide Inpatient Portal
 Implementation: Survey of Health Care Team Perceptions.

JMIR medical informatics

Jennifer L Hefner, Cynthia J Sieck, Daniel M Walker, Timothy R Huerta, Ann Scheck McAlearney

Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Medicine, The College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
  2. Department of Biomedical Informatics, The College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
  3. Division of Health Services Management and Policy, The College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

PMID: 28912115 PMCID: PMC5620453 DOI: 10.2196/medinform.7707

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inpatient portals, a new type of patient portal tailored specifically to the hospital setting, can allow patients to access up-to-date health information and exchange secure communications with their care team. As such, inpatient portals present an opportunity for patients to increase engagement in their care during a time of acute crisis that emphasizes focus on a patient's health. While there is a large body of research on patient portals in the outpatient setting, questions are being raised specifically about inpatient portals, such as how they will be incorporated into the flow of patient care in hectic, stressed, team-based hospital settings.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to improve understanding about hospital care team members' perceptions of the value of an interactive patient portal for admitted patients, as well as to ascertain staff orientation toward this new technology.

METHODS: Throughout the course of 2016, an inpatient portal, MyChart Bedside (MCB) was implemented across a five-hospital health system. The portal is a tablet-based app that includes a daily schedule, lab/test results, secure messaging with the care team, a place to take notes, and access to educational materials. Within a month of initial rollout, hospital care team members completed a 5-minute, anonymous online survey to assess attitudes and perceptions about MCB use and staff training for the new technology.

RESULTS: Throughout the health system, 686 staff members completed the survey: 193 physicians (23.6%), 439 nurses (53.7%), and 186 support staff (22.7%). Questions about the importance of MCB, self-efficacy in using MCB with patients, and feelings about sufficient training and resources showed that an average of 40-60% of respondents in each group reported a positive orientation toward the MCB technology and training received. This positive orientation was highest among support staff, lower among nurses, and lowest for physicians (all differences by staff role were statistically significant at P<.001). Additionally, 62.0% of respondents reported "not enough" training.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite the robust training effort, similar to that used in previous health information technology implementations at this health system, hospital care team members reported only a moderately positive orientation toward MCB and its potential, and the majority wanted more training. We propose that due to the unique elements of the inpatient portal-interactive features used by patients and providers requiring explanation and collaboration-traditional training approaches may be insufficient. Introduction of the inpatient portal as a new collaborative tool may thus require new methods of training to support enhanced engagement between patients and their care team.

©Jennifer L Hefner, Cynthia J Sieck, Daniel M Walker, Timothy R Huerta, Ann Scheck McAlearney. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 14.09.2017.

Keywords: hospitalization; medical informatics; patient participation; patient portals

References

  1. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23 (1):159-65 - PubMed
  2. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):742-50 - PubMed
  3. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 2):1166-70 - PubMed
  4. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):153-161 - PubMed
  5. Telemed J E Health. 2007 Oct;13(5):509-17 - PubMed
  6. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):202 - PubMed
  7. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):8-13 - PubMed
  8. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 06;:343-7 - PubMed
  9. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23 (1):80-7 - PubMed
  10. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e9-e17 - PubMed
  11. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):1-7 - PubMed
  12. JMIR Med Inform. 2017 Jul 04;5(3):e13 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support