Display options
Cite
Sugiura T, Yamamoto K, Horita S, et al. Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an . J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017;47(4):251-262doi: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.251.
Sugiura, T., Yamamoto, K., Horita, S., Murakami, K., Tsutsumi, S., & Kirita, T. (2017). Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an . Journal of periodontal & implant science, 47(4), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.251
Sugiura, Tsutomu, et al. "Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an ." Journal of periodontal & implant science vol. 47,4 (2017): 251-262. doi: https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.251
Sugiura T, Yamamoto K, Horita S, Murakami K, Tsutsumi S, Kirita T. Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an . J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Aug;47(4):251-262. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.251. Epub 2017 Aug 28. PMID: 28861289; PMCID: PMC5577443.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Aug;47(4):251-262. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.251. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an .

Journal of periodontal & implant science

Tsutomu Sugiura, Kazuhiko Yamamoto, Satoshi Horita, Kazuhiro Murakami, Sadami Tsutsumi, Tadaaki Kirita

Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
  2. Applied Electronics Laboratory, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

PMID: 28861289 PMCID: PMC5577443 DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.251

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion (relative displacement between the implant and bone) of immediately loaded implants by

METHODS: Six artificial bone blocks were prepared. Six screw-type implants with a length of 10 mm and diameter of 4.3 mm were placed, with 3 positioned axially and 3 tilted. The tilted implants were 30° distally inclined to the axial implants. Vertical and mesiodistal oblique (45° angle) loads of 200 N were applied to the top of the abutment, and the abutment displacement was recorded. Nonlinear finite element models simulating the

RESULTS: The abutment displacement was greater under oblique loading than under axial loading and greater for the tilted implants than for the axial implants. The

CONCLUSIONS: Tilted implants may have a lower maximum extent of micromotion than axial implants under mesiodistal oblique loading. The maximum micromotion values were strongly influenced by the loading direction. The maximum micromotion values did not reflect the abutment displacement values.

Keywords: Dental implants; Finite element analysis; Immediate dental implant loading

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

  1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):e96-101 - PubMed
  2. J Oral Rehabil. 2016 Sep;43(9):692-701 - PubMed
  3. Bone. 2005 Dec;37(6):776-80 - PubMed
  4. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998 Summer;43(2):192-203 - PubMed
  5. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jan;23(1):113-8 - PubMed
  6. J Formos Med Assoc. 2016 Sep;115(9):794-800 - PubMed
  7. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Feb;21(2):213-20 - PubMed
  8. J Biomech. 2007;40(5):1158-64 - PubMed
  9. Angle Orthod. 2014 May;84(3):500-7 - PubMed
  10. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):564-8 - PubMed
  11. J Prosthodont Res. 2014 Apr;58(2):92-101 - PubMed
  12. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):467-71 - PubMed
  13. J Periodontol. 2009 Jul;80(7):1125-32 - PubMed
  14. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Jan 01;20(1):e66-73 - PubMed
  15. J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Jan;60(1):29-35 - PubMed
  16. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):976-84 - PubMed
  17. Int J Prosthodont. 2015 Jan-Feb;28(1):40-7 - PubMed
  18. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):706-14 - PubMed
  19. Odontology. 2003 Sep;91(1):31-6 - PubMed
  20. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):1279-87 - PubMed
  21. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):1006-14 - PubMed
  22. Int J Implant Dent. 2016 Dec;2(1):17 - PubMed
  23. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Oct 09;9:137 - PubMed
  24. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):623-30 - PubMed
  25. J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Apr;61(2):123-132 - PubMed
  26. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995 May-Jun;10(3):345-53 - PubMed
  27. J Oral Implantol. 2013 Feb;39(1):23-9 - PubMed
  28. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):752-9 - PubMed
  29. Eur J Orthod. 2011 Oct;33(5):468-75 - PubMed
  30. J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Apr;35(4):283-90 - PubMed
  31. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):877-86 - PubMed
  32. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2013 Feb;43(1):30-6 - PubMed
  33. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007 Feb;221(2):213-7 - PubMed
  34. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):257-64 - PubMed
  35. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):e135-42 - PubMed
  36. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017 Mar;20(4):393-402 - PubMed
  37. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016 Jun;46(3):152-65 - PubMed
  38. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Feb;18(1):107-16 - PubMed
  39. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Jan-Feb;15(1):15-46 - PubMed

Publication Types