Display options
Cite
Nakano N, Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, et al. REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY USING THE MODERN CONSTRAINED CONDYLAR KNEE PROSTHESIS. Acta Ortop Bras. 2016;24(6):304-308doi: 10.1590/1413-785220162406146213.
Nakano, N., Matsumoto, T., Muratsu, H., Ishida, K., Kuroda, R., & Kurosaka, M. (2016). REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY USING THE MODERN CONSTRAINED CONDYLAR KNEE PROSTHESIS. Acta ortopedica brasileira, 24(6), 304-308. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220162406146213
Nakano, Naoki, et al. "REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY USING THE MODERN CONSTRAINED CONDYLAR KNEE PROSTHESIS." Acta ortopedica brasileira vol. 24,6 (2016): 304-308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220162406146213
Nakano N, Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Ishida K, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M. REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY USING THE MODERN CONSTRAINED CONDYLAR KNEE PROSTHESIS. Acta Ortop Bras. 2016 Nov-Dec;24(6):304-308. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220162406146213. PMID: 28924355; PMCID: PMC5594755.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Acta Ortop Bras. 2016 Nov-Dec;24(6):304-308. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220162406146213.

REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY USING THE MODERN CONSTRAINED CONDYLAR KNEE PROSTHESIS.

Acta ortopedica brasileira

Naoki Nakano, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Hirotsugu Muratsu, Kazunari Ishida, Ryosuke Kuroda, Masahiro Kurosaka

Affiliations

  1. . Kobe University, Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Japan.
  2. . Steel Memorial Hirohata Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirohata-ku, Himeji, Japan.
  3. . Kobe Kaisei Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nada-ku, Kobe, Japan.

PMID: 28924355 PMCID: PMC5594755 DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220162406146213

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the second-generation constrained condylar prosthesis provided satisfactory results in revision total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS: A series of 41 cases of revision total knee arthroplasty using the second-generation constrained condylar knee prosthesis was reviewed. The series comprised 7 men and 34 women with a mean age of 73.2 years. The original diagnosis was predominantly osteoarthritis. The most common reason for revision surgery was aseptic loosening. The mean interval between the primary and revision surgeries was 66.4 months. The mean follow-up period was 49.4 months.

RESULTS: The mean Knee Society knee score improved from 43.8 to 82.9 after revision surgery, the mean Knee Society function score improved from 37.1 to 79.2; the range of motion improved from 95.6° to 105.6° and the radiological femorotibial alignment improved from 181.4° (varus 6.4°) to 174.9° (valgus 0.1°), on average (

CONCLUSION: Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of the second-generation constrained condylar knee prosthesis yielded reproducible clinical success. Level of Evidence IV, Case series.

Keywords: Arthroplasty; Knee. Knee prosthesis Treatment outcome; replacement

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest referring to this article

References

  1. J Arthroplasty. 1997 Dec;12 (8):896-903 - PubMed
  2. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Dec;(309):131-5 - PubMed
  3. JAMA. 1994 May 4;271(17):1349-57 - PubMed
  4. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Mar;21(3):620-8 - PubMed
  5. J Arthroplasty. 1998 Jun;13(4):380-7 - PubMed
  6. Int Orthop. 2011 Dec;35(12):1783-9 - PubMed
  7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Jan;(226):21-8 - PubMed
  8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Aug;(221):272-7 - PubMed
  9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Dec;(273):83-90 - PubMed
  10. Orthop Clin North Am. 1982 Jan;13(1):201-12 - PubMed
  11. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jun;91(6):1440-7 - PubMed
  12. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Aug;(317):172-7 - PubMed
  13. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4 - PubMed
  14. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):3-19 - PubMed
  15. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Nov;77(11):1700-7 - PubMed
  16. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010 Jun;2(2):112-20 - PubMed
  17. J Arthroplasty. 1991 Sep;6(3):279-84 - PubMed
  18. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:167-75 - PubMed
  19. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Oct;(170):123-30 - PubMed
  20. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Jan;(226):86-92 - PubMed

Publication Types