Display options
Share it on

J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2017 Dec;28(12):2523-2531. doi: 10.1007/s13361-017-1803-z. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

Gender Diversity in a STEM Subfield - Analysis of a Large Scientific Society and Its Annual Conferences.

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

Evgenia Shishkova, Nicholas W Kwiecien, Alexander S Hebert, Michael S Westphall, Jessica E Prenni, Joshua J Coon

Affiliations

  1. The Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
  2. The Genome Center of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
  3. The Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. [email protected].
  4. The Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. [email protected].
  5. The Genome Center of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. [email protected].
  6. The Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53703, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 28952050 PMCID: PMC5856480 DOI: 10.1007/s13361-017-1803-z

Abstract

Speaking engagements, serving as session chairs, and receiving awards at national meetings are essential stepping stones towards professional success for scientific researchers. Studies of gender parity in meetings of national scientific societies repeatedly uncover bias in speaker selection, engendering underrepresentation of women among featured presenters. To continue this dialogue, we analyzed membership data and annual conference programs of a large scientific society (>7000 members annually) in a male-rich (~70% males), technology-oriented STEM subfield. We detected a pronounced skew towards males among invited keynote lecturers, plenary speakers, and recipients of the society's Senior Investigator award (15%, 13%, and 8% females, respectively). However, the proportion of females among Mid-Career and Young Investigator award recipients and oral session chairs resembled the current gender distribution of the general membership. Female members were more likely to present at the conferences and equally likely to apply and be accepted for oral presentations as their male counterparts. The gender of a session chair had no effect on the gender distribution of selected applicants. Interestingly, we identified several research subareas that were naturally enriched (i.e., not influenced by unequal selection of presenters) for either female or male participants, illustrating within a single subfield the gender divide along biology-technology line typical of all STEM disciplines. Two female-enriched topics experienced a rapid growth in popularity within the examined period, more than doubling the number of associated researchers. Collectively, these findings contribute to the contemporary discourse on gender in science and hopefully will propel positive changes within this and other societies. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

Keywords: Conference participation; Gender diversity in STEM; Gender equality; Scientific conference; Speaker selection; Women in science

References

  1. Psychol Inq. 2011 Jan 1;22(4):255-258 - PubMed
  2. MBio. 2014 Jan 07;5(1):e00846-13 - PubMed
  3. J Evol Biol. 2013 Sep;26(9):2063-9 - PubMed
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 28;112(17):5360-5 - PubMed
  5. Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 25;6:171 - PubMed
  6. Behav Anal. 2007 Fall;30(2):181-96 - PubMed
  7. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49682 - PubMed
  8. PeerJ. 2014 Oct 21;2:e627 - PubMed
  9. Psychol Bull. 2017 Jan;143(1):1-35 - PubMed
  10. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Nov 20;10(11):e1003903 - PubMed
  11. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 28;11(7):e0160015 - PubMed
  12. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2014;47:43-76 - PubMed
  13. Nature. 2013 Dec 12;504(7479):211-3 - PubMed
  14. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141 - PubMed
  15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16474-9 - PubMed
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 22;108(8):3157-62 - PubMed
  17. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010 Oct 1;19(5):275-279 - PubMed
  18. Soc Sci Res. 2013 Nov;42(6):1519-41 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support