Can J Hosp Pharm. 2017 Jul-Aug;70(4):294-300. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v70i4.1680. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

Home Care Pharmacy Practice in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Services Provided, Remuneration, Barriers, and Facilitators.

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy

Sherilyn Houle, Linda MacKeigan

PMID: 28894314 PMCID: PMC5587043 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.v70i4.1680

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the population ages, and individuals desire to remain in their homes as long as possible, the need for in-home care is expected to increase. However, pharmacists have rarely been included in studies of in-home care, and little is known about the prevalence or effectiveness of pharmacists' home-based services in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To identify pharmacy practices in Canada that regularly provide in-home patient care and to identify specific services provided, remuneration obtained, and barriers and facilitators influencing the provision of home-based care.

METHODS: A link to a web-based survey was posted in e-newsletters of provincial, territorial, and national pharmacy associations in Canada. In addition, pharmacists known to the researchers as providing in-home clinical services were contacted directly. The survey was open from October to December 2015. Practices or organizations that performed at least one home visit per week for clinical purposes, with documentation of the services provided, were eligible to participate. One response per practice or organization was allowed.

RESULTS: Seventeen practices meeting the inclusion criteria were identified, representing community, hospital, and clinic settings. Home visits were most commonly performed for individuals with complex medication regimens or nonadherence to medication therapy. The most common services were conducting medication reconciliation and reviews and counselling patients about medication adherence. No practices or organizations billed patients for these services, yet lack of remuneration was an important barrier identified by many respondents. Although 12 (71%) of the respondents collected data for evaluative purposes, collection of clinical or health system outcome data was rare.

CONCLUSIONS: Few Canadian pharmacy practices that provide in-home patient care at least once a week could be identified. Data collection suitable to establish an evidence base for this service was infrequently performed by practices and organizations providing home-based care. Such evidence is needed to justify the expansion of this service nationally, including consistent and adequate remuneration from governments or other payers.

Keywords: home care services; pharmaciens; pharmacists; pharmacy services; services de pharmacie; soins à domicile

Conflict of interest statement

References

1. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2013 May;146(3):162-8 - PubMed
2. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2002 Sep-Oct;42(5):735-42 - PubMed
3. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2013 May;146(3):155-61 - PubMed
4. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2013 May;146(3):139-42 - PubMed
5. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Sep 01;13(5):1-65 - PubMed
6. Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Mar;44(3):424-31 - PubMed
7. Healthc Q. 2009;12 Spec No Patient:40-8 - PubMed
8. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;(4):CD000994 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article