Front Vet Sci. 2017 Sep 12;4:149. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00149. eCollection 2017.
Analysis of Contractility and Invasion Potential of Two Canine Mammary Tumor Cell Lines.
Frontiers in veterinary science
Kaisa Rajakylä, Ramaswamy Krishnan, Sari Tojkander
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Biosciences, Section of Pathology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
PMID: 28955712
PMCID: PMC5600937 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00149
Abstract
Cancer cells are surrounded by a mechanically and biochemically distinct microenvironment that undergoes dynamic changes throughout the neoplastic progression. During this progression, some cancer cells acquire abnormal characteristics that potentiate their escape from the primary tumor site, to establish secondary tumors in distant organs. Recent studies with several human cancer cell lines have shown that the altered physical properties of tumor cells, such as their ability to apply high traction forces to the surroundings, are directly linked with their potential to invade and metastasize. To test the hypothetical interconnection between actomyosin-mediated traction forces and invasion potential within 3D-microenvironment, we utilized two canine mammary tumor cell lines with different contractile properties. These cell lines, canine mammary tumor (CMT)-U27 and CMT-U309, were found to have distinct expression patterns of lineage-specific markers and organization of actin-based structures. In particular, CMT-U309 carcinoma cells were typified by thick contractile actomyosin bundles that exerted high forces to their environment, as measured by traction force microscopy. These high contractile forces also correlated with the prominent invasiveness of the CMT-U309 cell line. Furthermore, we found high contractility and 3D-invasion potential to be dependent on the activity of 5'AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), as blocking AMPK signaling was found to reverse both of these features. Taken together, our findings implicate that actomyosin forces correlate with the invasion potential of the studied cell lines.
Keywords: AMP-activated protein kinase; actin cytoskeleton; actomyosin forces; breast cancer; canine mammary tumor; contractility; invasion; traction force imaging
References
- Vet Pathol. 2006 Jul;43(4):424-9 - PubMed
- Vet Pathol. 2014 Jan;51(1):127-45 - PubMed
- Clujul Med. 2016;89(1):38-49 - PubMed
- Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015 Aug;16(8):486-98 - PubMed
- J Physiol. 2006 Jul 1;574(Pt 1):17-31 - PubMed
- Mod Pathol. 2006 Feb;19(2):264-71 - PubMed
- Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 22;108(12):4708-13 - PubMed
- Biosci Rep. 2015 Sep 15;35(5):null - PubMed
- Vet J. 2010 Apr;184(1):45-51 - PubMed
- J Cell Biol. 2006 May 8;173(3):383-94 - PubMed
- Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Nov;16(11):2247-56 - PubMed
- Cell. 2009 Nov 25;139(5):871-90 - PubMed
- Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Mar;30(3):300-9 - PubMed
- J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2007 Sep;12(2-3):127-33 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5486 - PubMed
- J Small Anim Pract. 2000 Jul;41(7):287-91 - PubMed
- Biochem J. 2006 Mar 1;394(Pt 2):449-57 - PubMed
- Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Feb;9(2):108-22 - PubMed
- Vet Pathol. 2008 Nov;45(6):803-15 - PubMed
- Am J Pathol. 1974 Apr;75(1):225-8 - PubMed
- J Comp Pathol. 1989 Nov;101(4):389-97 - PubMed
- In Vitro Cell Dev Biol. 1992 May;28A(5):309-19 - PubMed
- Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2013 Apr;70(4):201-14 - PubMed
- Cancer Invest. 2000;18(8):781-92 - PubMed
- J Comp Pathol. 2014 Aug-Oct;151(2-3):166-80 - PubMed
- Mol Med Today. 1997 Jan;3(1):8-11 - PubMed
- Bioarchitecture. 2012 May 1;2(3):75-87 - PubMed
- Science. 2009 Nov 27;326(5957):1208-12 - PubMed
- Vet Pathol. 2011 Jan;48(1):117-31 - PubMed
- Vet Pathol. 1992 Mar;29(2):179-81 - PubMed
- Acta Biomater. 2014 May;10 (5):1886-96 - PubMed
- Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 Nov;28(11):1506-12 - PubMed
- Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000 Jun;61(3):197-210 - PubMed
- Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002 Oct;283(4):C1254-66 - PubMed
- Cell Prolif. 2003 Oct;36 Suppl 1:73-84 - PubMed
- Eur J Cell Biol. 2008 Sep;87(8-9):669-76 - PubMed
- Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1997 Feb;27(1):46-50 - PubMed
- Apoptosis. 2015 Jun;20(6):821-30 - PubMed
- Elife. 2015 Dec 10;4:e06126 - PubMed
- Transl Res. 2012 Mar;159(3):165-72 - PubMed
- Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1990 Sep;9(2):125-36 - PubMed
- J Pathol. 2004 Jun;203(2):661-71 - PubMed
- Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 May;1773(5):642-52 - PubMed
- Vet Q. 1993 Sep;15(3):102-7 - PubMed
- J Cell Sci. 2012 Apr 15;125(Pt 8):1855-64 - PubMed
- IUBMB Life. 2013 Nov;65(11):889-96 - PubMed
- Invest Cell Pathol. 1979 Oct-Dec;2(4):257-75 - PubMed
- Oncogene. 2003 Sep 18;22(40):6194-203 - PubMed
- Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(5):R68 - PubMed
- J Cell Sci. 2011 Feb 1;124(Pt 3):369-83 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32572 - PubMed
- J Cell Sci. 2005 Mar 1;118(Pt 5):873-87 - PubMed
- Cell. 2012 Mar 2;148(5):1015-28 - PubMed
- Cancers (Basel). 2010 May 28;2(2):1040-65 - PubMed
- Am J Surg. 2016 Apr;211(4):716-21 - PubMed
- Cell Adh Migr. 2014;8(6):578-87 - PubMed
- CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Jan-Feb;57(1):43-66 - PubMed
- Biophys J. 2014 Dec 2;107(11):2528-37 - PubMed
Publication Types