Display options
Share it on

Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017 Oct 12;19(12):89. doi: 10.1007/s11936-017-0590-y.

Multimodality Imaging of Pericardial Diseases.

Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine

Mouaz H Al-Mallah, Fatimah Almasoudi, Mohamed Ebid, Amjad M Ahmed, Abdelrahman Jamiel

Affiliations

  1. King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. [email protected].
  2. King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. [email protected].
  3. King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. [email protected].
  4. Division Head, Cardiac Imaging, King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City for National Guard, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Departmental Code: 1413, P.O. Box 22490, Riyadh, 11426, Saudi Arabia. [email protected].
  5. King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  6. King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

PMID: 29027095 DOI: 10.1007/s11936-017-0590-y

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Pericardial diseases have changed their epidemiology in the past few years. With the aging population and decreasing incidence of communicable diseases, the causes of pericardial diseases have significantly changed from infectious and malignant to postradiation and cardiac surgery causes. Despite that, pericardial diseases remain difficult to diagnose. The accurate and timely diagnosis of these diseases is essential to avoid the late sequela of pericardial constriction and pericardial cirrhosis. Echocardiography remains the first test of choice for the assessment of patients with suspected pericardial diseases. Most patients with acute pericarditis have a self-limiting course and do not need further imaging. However, in the era of multimodality imaging, other modalities, namely, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), are often utilized in complex cases. These two modalities provide a wide-open view of the pericardium and adjacent structures. They have high resolution to assess pericardial calcification, a hallmark of many diseases especially tuberculous constrictive pericarditis. CMR is also unique in its ability to assess pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and edema. These have been recently suggested to be very important in the progression from acute pericarditis to constrictive pericarditis. In addition, they provide prognostic value to assess which patients are at high risk of developing heart failure and resource utilization. Thus, in the current era, patients with suspected complex pericardial diseases will need a multimodality approach rather than a single modality approach.

Keywords: Computed tomography; Imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pericardial disease

References

  1. Circulation. 2011 Oct 25;124(17):1830-7 - PubMed
  2. Heart Fail Rev. 2011 Jul;16(4):369-80 - PubMed
  3. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Nov;10(5):617-26 - PubMed
  4. Heart Fail Rev. 2017 Jul;22(4):385-399 - PubMed
  5. Circulation. 2003 Oct 14;108(15):1852-7 - PubMed
  6. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Dec;22(7):1935-43 - PubMed
  7. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;5(1):15-24 - PubMed
  8. Acute Card Care. 2014 Mar;16(1):23-7 - PubMed
  9. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2009 Summer;10(3):134-41 - PubMed
  10. Echocardiography. 2004 Apr;21(3):269-72 - PubMed
  11. JAMA. 2003 Mar 5;289(9):1150-3 - PubMed
  12. Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 7;36(42):2921-64 - PubMed
  13. Clin Cardiol. 2014 Aug;37(8):456-61 - PubMed
  14. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun;28(5):1099-109 - PubMed
  15. G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2016 Mar;17(3):197-207 - PubMed
  16. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2015 Dec;68(12 ):1092-100 - PubMed
  17. Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jul 15;191:284-5 - PubMed
  18. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2016;14 (4):525-39 - PubMed
  19. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 May-Jun;8(3):205-14 - PubMed
  20. World J Cardiol. 2011 May 26;3(5):135-43 - PubMed
  21. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 May;3(3):333-43 - PubMed
  22. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 May;18(5):41 - PubMed
  23. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004 May;42(3):587-601, vi - PubMed
  24. Circulation. 1999 Sep 28;100(13):1380-6 - PubMed
  25. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Aug;147(2):245-52 - PubMed
  26. Eur Heart J. 2014 Sep 7;35(34):2279-84 - PubMed
  27. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Sep 1;106(5):742-7 - PubMed
  28. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 May;151(5):1356-7 - PubMed
  29. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1999 Dec;40(6):909-13 - PubMed
  30. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Dec;23 (6):1266-1274 - PubMed
  31. Cardiology. 2016;133(4):239-41 - PubMed
  32. Clin Cardiol. 2017 Oct;40(10 ):839-846 - PubMed
  33. Heart Fail Rev. 2017 Jul;22(4):381-383 - PubMed
  34. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Feb 15;115(4):542-7 - PubMed
  35. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;5(1):25-7 - PubMed
  36. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 May;8(5):null - PubMed
  37. Cleve Clin J Med. 2013 Feb;80(2):97-100 - PubMed
  38. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 22;66(12):1378-91 - PubMed
  39. N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 18;371(25):2410-6 - PubMed
  40. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Sep;26(9):965-1012.e15 - PubMed
  41. Eur Radiol. 2006 Mar;16(3):569-74 - PubMed
  42. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Nov;4(11):1180-91 - PubMed
  43. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(6):514-23 - PubMed
  44. Radiographics. 2003 Oct;23 Spec No:S167-80 - PubMed
  45. Lancet. 2004 Feb 28;363(9410):717-27 - PubMed
  46. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 May;7(3):526-34 - PubMed
  47. Eur Heart J. 2004 Apr;25(7):587-610 - PubMed
  48. Cardiol Clin. 1990 Nov;8(4):587-600 - PubMed

Publication Types