Display options
Share it on

BJPsych Open. 2016 Nov 23;2(6):366-372. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002469. eCollection 2016 Nov.

Local availability of green and blue space and prevalence of common mental disorders in the Netherlands.

BJPsych open

Sjerp de Vries, Margreet Ten Have, Saskia van Dorsselaer, Manja van Wezep, Tia Hermans, Ron de Graaf

Affiliations

  1. , PhD, Environmental Research (Alterra), Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  2. , PhD, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos Institute), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  3. , MSc, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos Institute), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  4. , MSc, Environmental Research (Alterra), Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

PMID: 29018562 PMCID: PMC5609776 DOI: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002469

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies revealed a relationship between residential green space availability and health, especially mental health. Studies on blue space are scarcer and results less conclusive.

AIMS: To investigate the hypotheses that green and blue space availability are negatively associated with anxiety and mood disorders, and positively associated with self-reported mental and general health.

METHOD: Health data were derived from a nationally representative survey (NEMESIS-2,

RESULTS: The hypotheses were confirmed, except for green space and mood disorders. Associations were generally stronger for blue space than for green space, with ORs up to 0.74 for a 10%-point increase.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite the different survey design and health measures, the results largely replicate those of previous studies on green space. Blue space availability deserves more systematic attention.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None.

COPYRIGHT AND USAGE: © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license.

References

  1. Int J Public Health. 2010 Dec;55(6):531-42 - PubMed
  2. Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Dec;122(12):1351-8 - PubMed
  3. Public Health. 2006 Dec;120(12):1117-26 - PubMed
  4. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2006;15(4):167-80 - PubMed
  5. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2011 Nov;214(6):449-60 - PubMed
  6. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Oct;94:26-33 - PubMed
  7. Prev Med. 2008 Sep;47(3):273-8 - PubMed
  8. Public Health. 2013 Apr;127(4):318-24 - PubMed
  9. Soc Sci Med. 2012 May;74(10):1570-7 - PubMed
  10. Environ Int. 2016 May;91:161-7 - PubMed
  11. Health Place. 2013 Sep;23:97-103 - PubMed
  12. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Dec;63(12):967-73 - PubMed
  13. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006 Mar-Apr;28(2):125-32 - PubMed
  14. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010 Sep;19(3):125-41 - PubMed
  15. Health Place. 2012 Sep;18(5):1198-201 - PubMed
  16. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012 Dec;21(4):371-9 - PubMed
  17. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 May;180:428-33 - PubMed
  18. Health Place. 2016 Mar;38:8-15 - PubMed
  19. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Jul;60(7):587-92 - PubMed
  20. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Apr 22;12(4):4354-79 - PubMed
  21. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 16;8(7):e69045 - PubMed
  22. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;47(2):203-13 - PubMed
  23. J Affect Disord. 2012 Nov;140(3):300-5 - PubMed
  24. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;47(10):1675-84 - PubMed
  25. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Jun;6(6):463-75 - PubMed
  26. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 May;62(5):e9 - PubMed
  27. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:207-28 - PubMed
  28. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(3):568-75 - PubMed
  29. Scand J Public Health. 2010 Jun;38(4):411-7 - PubMed
  30. Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1655-60 - PubMed
  31. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Jun;66(6):e8 - PubMed
  32. Health Place. 2009 Jun;15(2):586-95 - PubMed
  33. Environ Int. 2015 Apr;77:35-41 - PubMed

Publication Types